Don't forget it would be a seller's market. In the instance you've provided, "we" would have something "they" want badly and they would have to pay handsomely to get it. It could work to the advantage of the lower team . Jake Spencer for a first or second round pick to a team with all its ruckmen injured? I'd take it.
Surely both teams would have to agree to a trade. It wouldn't be compulsory to trade a player away if you didn't want to or if you thought the deal was not to your team's advantage.
Ours is the only game in the world that requires a match official to execute a difficult skill to begin proceedings.
Get rid of it and nobody will even notice the difference.
He's done it again! Matches = Fitz (fits) + Patrick (Danger/field). The punctuation is a classic cryptic misdirection.
Two left thrillseekers, namely 6 (easy) and 12 (tougher).