There are hits, and there are misses.
That's a miss.
Oh, the way I see it - If we offer something he agrees to, then we have 'matched' or 'beaten' the GWS deal.
KS is wrong in that we won't get close in terms of money, but he's right in that we will go close (or over) in terms of lifestyle, playing with mates, playing for the MFC!, and being near family.
I'm not worried at all.
Yeah, while Scully, Trengove et al will dominate the midfield for us, I think that a winger like Aaron will only become more valuable as teams try to tag/harass Scully and Trengove.
He might kick more goals though...
This is a better sentiment then some of the chauvinism and 'you can't call AFL if you didn't play it' nonsense that is disguised chauvinism.
Not a great voice, far too literal, almost 'closed caption' for the hearing endowed.
But females are welcome to apply.
If it were my decision I would go for Campbell, only on the fact that I haven't seen enough from Spencer for him to be 'given' games.
Although, the FD rate him highly...
Could be a close one.
I definitely think that Campbell will be eleveated for Rd 1.
It's a funny one - if I wanted to enhance our flag hopes I would play Spencer, and if winning was the only priority I would play Campbell.
I think the FD want Spencer to be playing Rd 1 but if he isn't there yet, Campbell will get the nod.
Now that is a counter intuitive leap right there...
He's just one of the lads that gropes women in bathrooms and takes on police when he is drunk.
Does anyone else cringe when this is the supposed culture we adore - the larrikin?
Or is 'the larrikin' someone other than a drunken, abusive, cheating, lout?
The guy is consistently wrong.
He just wants to create a narrative.
Dees improving. Easy draw. Stalling after a few losses. Bailey under pressure. Craig pissing off Garry by asking him if he will throw his hat into the ring.
Sunrise, sunset.
I get that he needs some help, but football has not been his friend.
It has given him money (which he loses on gambling), hangers-on (that are a bad influence and get him out there and [censored]), and noteriety (which leads to the knives coming out).
This is a re-occuring theme of Fevola's and he needs to get help (which he is doing), go and see his kids, and re-join reality.
I think he should quit, personally.
NPD!
Did you get that from the Bruce thread?
Anyway, the bloke has had enough chances and second chances. Time to sort out his life away from football.
I really hate the 'he needs football' argument. That isn't an argument for him staying in football, it's an argument for kicking him out and forcing him to develop as a person in what the non-footballer citizenry like to call 'reality.'
Yeah, I agree with that.
Whenever a poster, usually Mono, came on here in 2009 and said let's 'Raleigh' the coach the point that a few of us made was that improvements were being made, and Moloney's decision making was one of them.
And his clearance work before Sandilands got to him this season was incredibly good.
Best 18 for the foreseeable future.
I didn't do any leg work in that thread though...
Leg work:
14.6 An AFL Club which is eligible to nominate a Rookie Player pursuant to clause 14.5
may:
a] where the AFL Club has nominated one Player on its Veterans List,
nominate one Player from its Rookie List as being available for selection by
that AFL Club for AFL Premiership Season Matches and AFL Finals Series
Matches; and
b] where the AFL Club has not nominated a Player on its Veterans List,
nominate up to two Players from its Rookie List as being available for
selection by the AFL Club for AFL Premiership Season Matches and AFL
Finals Series Matches.
I want to know how a ruckman 're-invents' oneself as a ruckman...
Don't you have to change positions to 're-invent'?
Anyway, we have an AA ruckman, let's keep it that way, hmmm?
Yeah, I can be trying at times.
But I don't get personal - I don't call anyone a loser, insist they have poor judgment, or intimate that a poster is a "c***".
And I don't send PMs like our friend John does. They are passive aggressive, unnecessary, and intimadatory.
I really don't think that there is any parallel.
My recent idiocy was the "superior supporter" argument and I apologised for that.
You should PM your friend, you obviously have a rapport, and tell him to show some class.