Everything posted by Stiff Arm
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Spoke with a couple of random Collingwood supporters this morning who recited the 'it was a football act' and 'if you've ever played a contact sport you'd know it was ok'. Funnily enough, I played the game in my youth and when questioned, neither if them had! Ha! As an aside, does anyone from MFC attend the tribunal? Maybe our club doctor or someone from the FD? The hearing needs balance
-
Stuff drafting a kid, poach a key forward.
Had we converted more of our i50s into scores we would also have won the game, regardless of the missed shot we had. I believe the 7 on the fulls were for the whole ground, but there were certainly a number in the forward line Thats it from me, good night AF
- Trade Rumours 2023
-
Stuff drafting a kid, poach a key forward.
Plenty of excuses could be used for the loss: injuries, poor goal kicking, Gus getting knocked out which prevented Trac spending more time forward, etc. They are simplistic excuses The Pies also missed a number of gettable shots, that works both ways. Yet, with that many forward entries we should've won comfortably I don't think I've ever seen a worse game for ineffective i50s. And this is a pattern years old. Might win us 16 H&A games, but gets found out in finals Our "method" fails to convert a large enough percentage of our i50s. We had 26% conversion into a score from 69 entries, Coll were 41%, and they weren't exactly accurate either With those entry numbers most teams would expect to win by 10 goals, in which case our missed set shots wouldn't be used as an excuse. Collingwood can only dream of stats like that IMO it is our connection forward and predictable forward strategies that will cost us this year's flag. That is where our "method" fails. With that addressed, we crush the Pies BTW, I believe Tmac missed one set shot, not multiple 😉
- Trade Rumours 2023
-
Stuff drafting a kid, poach a key forward.
Nice response, AF The objective of the game is to kick a winning score. We can talk about our contest and defensive strengths ad nauseum, we know they are our strengths, but we struggle to have a functional forward line and decent delivery i50, and have for years. Locking it i50 isn't good enough. Let's talk more about how we are going to score goals, without using injuries as an excuse Fwiw, if you havent already, might like to read the Roar article which talks about our forward strategies on Thurs night. Their point about our first goal from the Brayshaw hit was spot on. No one was leading towards Gus, despite the leading forward being a weakness of Howe and Moore. Everyone was running back one on one. Trac was Maynard's opponent and was free and 40 out direct in front waving his arms. But Gus has been taught to kick long, just what Coll had hoped for. The better option was to flick a handball to Trac, given no one was leading forward into the open paddock
-
TRAINING: Sunday 9th September 2023
That article describes our predictable forward strategies to a T. A good read.
-
Welcome to Demonland: Shane McAdam
Fwiw, I was told after our '21 GF from someone experienced in AFL fitness circles that Goody and Burgo had some differences of opinion in terms of responsibilities, that is, keeping out of club politics. Goody was OK with him returning to SA. Just repeating what I was told. Might explain the recruitment of Griffiths at the end of 2020 as his understudy. I wouldn't discount McAdam based upon his relationship with Burgo
- Trade Rumours 2023
-
Stuff drafting a kid, poach a key forward.
I would've thought our most important strength should be the ability to kick goals. Maybe my priorities are askew
-
Goodwin has been here before!
Huh? You missed the point completely Mind out of the gutter, too
-
Goodwin has been here before!
How would any of us know this to be true? The question is, have we gone hard enough for a big, young key forward? I can't see it The $600k we are paying Grundy, plus a bit more would've been tempting to any forward. We've had some 1st and 2nd round picks available Edit. Actually, both McKay and Curnow were available to us in their draft when we were rebuilding. We chose Weid
- Nick Watson
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
How far away is Matt Jefferson?
Good thanks. You?
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
#freebruz Maynard's the victim, didn't you know?!
-
How far away is Matt Jefferson?
Gee, never heard that line on Land before... On a par with 'if you don't like it, don't read it'
-
Stuff drafting a kid, poach a key forward.
Sure, but how do we kick goals when we are defence focussed in our F50? The connection i50 has been an issue for years. But that goes two ways, it's hard to connect when there's no space, resting rucks, poor leading patterns and small guys flying for speckies instead of crumbing. Spargo is a very good kick i50, but he cannot get the ball often enough I know it's more nuanced than that, and I'm just a punter in the stand. But clearly our forward line is not working and has been our biggest issue for years
-
Stuff drafting a kid, poach a key forward.
I disagree, but see your point. The credit for where we are is due to our defence and contest. Goody has talked about this as being our core many times We've probably not valued the forward line enough in the last 4-5 years to make the most of the defence and contest. We recruited BBB, a crippled lead up forward, then banged it in on his head, and Grundy, who isn't a forward. I fear JVR will not develop as he should due to the pressure to perform We don't have enough quality forward players, but more importantly, nor do we have strategies to kick enough goals. The former doesn't work without the latter, regardless of personnel Our forward line last night was as crowded and disorganised as the train I took home. Maybe PTV are our forward line strategy consultants 🤔