Everything posted by Stiff Arm
-
Nate Caddy
Equally, JVR will be better when playing 3rd tall, rather than 1st tall forward
-
The Pick 3 Thread
42 might be Brown, or might be a project player (ruck?) and Brown is rookied
-
Nate Caddy
- The 2023 Draft and Trade Targets Thread
Hawks and dogs picks used for matching F/S will be after 42. They each have one early pick and then only late picks to be used for points. Only GCS picks will be before 42, six picks before then to go towards 3 players. 3 GCS+Croft+McCabe=5 GCS use 6 picks before our 42 So our pick should move up to 41 Is that correct?- Training Ground?
Most, if not all, of the money would be public money from govts, so if we were to eventually leave, the facility would have to stay in public ownership Unless we fund the majority, who are we to claim rights?- Training Ground?
The funding would largely come from govt and private contributions. Community inclusion would be necessary. Whatever the Club puts in would be depreciated over time anyway. Keep doubling down, but you're not gonna win this battle- Training Ground?
Does Coll own the Olympic ground or the old swimming pool? Richmond? Carlton? North Melb? Saints? Brisbane? No, of course they don't A long lease is fine and common practice. "Diabolical" is a tad hysteric, even for you, WYL!- Nate Caddy
Iirc there's a recent article somewhere that claims he's 197cm.- Nick Watson
- Nick Watson
So if we select Watson, our small to small/med forwards will be Watson, Kossie, McAdam, Chandler, Spagonicus, ANB. All with differing rolls, of course, but that's a crowded grouping Unless Watson has potential to eventually play midfield, I'm not sure what the strategy is. It's usually best available at the pointy end of the dtaft, which might be him. I'm hoping for a classy mid at 6 (7). We need to develop the next A grade mid- The Pick 3 Thread
I think North will either give up 2+3 for 1, or far more likely, use 2 and 3 on Duursma and McKercher On top of their current crop, those two will help set them up for success over the next 10 years; that is, if North can maintain stability and not implode again- Nate Caddy
Do you know him personally?- Nate Caddy
Can't see us picking a key forward with our first pick 3 years in a row. We've got JVR, Petty, Jefferson as our tall forward mix, with Schache as support. However, I can see us going after a key forward FA in 2024 Hopefully Sanders with 6, and we trade 11 and F1st for 7 or 8 (O'Sullivan)- Welcome to Demonland: Jack Billings
- The Pick 1 Thread
Agreed, but I find it hard to see how we can match Norf's bounty. Otherwise, I'd be keen to go for pick 2 or 3 from Norf. McKercher or Duursma would be grand, but not for 6, 11 and F1st. That's a bridge too far- The Pick 1 Thread
Reckon it might be 11 and F1st for 7 or 8. I'm hoping Lamby and Taylor are targeting O'Sullivan Imagine Sanders/Curtain and O'Sullivan...- The Pick 1 Thread
True. But if Sanders is available at 6, I think he may become a Dee. Wouldn't it be good to get a classy mid AND a key back in this draft? I think adding midfield class is a high priority in this draft- The Pick 1 Thread
I can see us enquiring about what 11 and F1st would get. Maybe 8 or 7? 11 will become 15 or 16 after academy bids. If Lamb, Taylor and Goody are set on O'Sullivan, they'll need to get higher than that- Trade Rumours 2023
- Can we still use pick 42?
42 will end up being around 33 by the end of bid matching We can still use it to trade up higher right up to draft night- Trade Rumours 2023
- Welcome to Demonland: Jack Billings
- The Pick 1 Thread
Yet no one knows if Reid or Curtain will be flight risks. Both have come out and poured water over such claims. In fact Curtain seemed to look forward to potentially living interstate, according to the interview I heard. Not all draftees want to live where they grew up. I reckon the Reid/Curtain flight risk thing is a myth- Trade Rumours 2023
- The Pick 1 Thread
No, best to use our picks now. Have we ever traded our current 1st for a future 1st? - The 2023 Draft and Trade Targets Thread