Jump to content

Matt

Members
  • Posts

    252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matt

  1. I was looking through past phantom form guides by Cal, and came across the November one, which features Dogga at 11, Rivers at 23, and Pickett at 30. Considering we haven’t even reached Cal’s November phantom form guide this year, it just really shows how unpredictable drafting can be. And yes, I am aware Cal isn’t predicting who will go where, I just found it interesting. https://www.westernbulldogs.com.au/news/308766/cal-twomeys-2019-phantom-form-guide-november-update
  2. Just going off highlights, Hewitt looks like he could potentially become a gun, imo
  3. I like the idea of us taking Jefferson, and have him develop at Casey, and in the gym, for a couple of years
  4. The Inner Sanctum’s First Round AFL Phantom Draft 2022 7. Jhye Clark – Hawthorn 8. Cam Mackenzie – Geelong I actually hope Jhye Clark doesn't get to Geelong, so far this offseason, they've got exactly what they wanted
  5. I wouldn’t be surprised if we do trade up this year. We do it every year, and the following years draft is often seen as better, for whatever reason. I think we could do it, and still have picks next year.
  6. The Bombers have put pick 4 on the trade table. I wonder if we go after it. The top 5 are meant to be quality (although you can never be 100% sure).
  7. Great get. Pretty happy with our trade period as a whole. Will be interesting to see if we trade up from here.
  8. 37 is better than I expected. Pretty happy with that result. It’s not like Weid was going to play.
  9. Just saw the news. I know it’s not very grown up, but I was going to crack it if we gave them 13 😂 Very happy Dees supporter here!
  10. I wonder if we would do a similar deal, to move up the draft
  11. So what pick(s) can we offer for Grundy? 27?
  12. I think the Weid pick may be, as we might need the Bedford pick to add to/combine with 27, to trade for Grundy
  13. Yeah hopefully it’s North’s
  14. I thought teams aren’t allowed to trade out their future 1st & 2nd? Or am I wrong about that?
  15. Four-club stunner looms as stars wait until last minute: Verdict on 10 biggest AFL trades left
  16. On Trade Radio, Cal said we would only be using two picks
  17. from AFL.com.au Luke Jackson The Dockers have offered pick No.13 and a future first-round selection for Jackson and the Demons have wanted to get inside the top-seven of the draft as well as the early pick for next year. Fremantle's stronger suite of draft selections, including two future second-round selections and two future third-round selections, gives the Dockers a bigger hand to play with to get the trade over the line with some possible later sliding of selections an option. Jackson has always been favoured to get to Fremantle, with West Coast not in the picture at this stage. Brodie Grundy Collingwood has targeted a top-25 pick for Grundy, with Melbourne swapping its way into pick No.27. The Pies appear likely to wait and see if the Demons get any more selections in for Luke Jackson's expected trade to Fremantle, but the Demons' pick No.27 is on the table. Grundy has five years to go on his contract at Collingwood, with the Magpies to pay a portion of his remaining years as he combines with Max Gawn at Melbourne. Rory Lobb Fremantle has said that its contracted tall forward isn't going to be traded to the Western Bulldogs with a year to run on his deal. This one has links to the Luke Jackson and Josh Dunkley trades given the Dockers wouldn't consider anything with Jackson not completed and Dunkley's trade potentially giving the Bulldogs a greater chance to offer something that gets Fremantle interested. The Dogs have put forward a second-round pick – either this year or next – for Lobb. Toby Bedford GWS has put forward pick No.44 to secure Bedford, who has requested a trade to the New South Wales club where he hopes to earn more senior opportunities. However, Melbourne is determined to secure more in a deal for a player who graduated from its Next Generation Academy. The problem? The Giants don't have anything else, aside from their suite of five picks inside the top-20 of the draft. Could a future pick get this sorted? Expect negotiations to drag out a little longer, with both clubs locked in significant deals elsewhere.
  18. I agree. I would be quite disappointed if we didn’t at least try Petty up forward. He could be a threat as a forward imo, and bring better forward pressure at that position, than we currently have.
  19. Where did this rumour come from?
  20. Where has this come from?
×
×
  • Create New...