Jump to content

Ham

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ham

  1. Exactly. Such a moronic thread to start.
  2. Ham replied to CP38and3's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Exactly, this thread must have been created by someone who has never been to a home game...
  3. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Agree, super stiff. He was actually quite good. Unfortunate that Neitschke didn't get a real run at it, especially considering that players he got drafted with are now premiership players. Best of luck to them all.
  4. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    You should go back and watch. 😉
  5. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Petracca isn't? Constantly smiling and laughing...
  6. You've still got time to delete this thread.
  7. Agree, couldn't give a toss about Cerra, don't need him, not interested at all.
  8. Matheson is just a flat out thug. Not a single ounce of football skill in his body.
  9. INSUFFICIENT ATTEMPT, ARE YOU [censored] KIDDING!
  10. Right? Who would've thought...
  11. T-Mac was a key back in his 6th season. Time works wonders. Back Weid in.
  12. What about the free kick for Weightman just jumping on players heads and getting no where near the ball? [censored] [censored].
  13. FREE KICK DOGS FREE KICK DOGS FREE KICK DOGS FREE KICK DOGS FREE KICK DOGS
  14. What a [censored] of an umpire. "High or in the back, one or the other" Then the replay shows it's clearing [censored] below the knees and should be a free for Harmes.
  15. HIGH?!?!?!?! For [censored] what
  16. 18 - 6 free kicks to the bulldogs.... ?
  17. Don't rate that at all. Harmes needs to go to Libba.
  18. The umpires, the commentators and the AFL wanted Hawthorn to win that game.
  19. I certainly hope not, he has a terrible attitude and distracts the focus of his team mates from the game, to himself.
  20. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Cats, Port, Lions, GWS, Hawks
  21. Ham replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    What position do you hold at the club? Didn't realise you were the expert. It's all opinions mate, learn that and get over it.
  22. Ham replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Wow.... just wow.
  23. Ham replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I rate Stafford as well, as a ruck coach, not a forward/kicking coach. The only player who has turned a point out of those is Petracca and he hardly sought out Pendlebury for advice, he's mentioned that multiple times. Our forwards spoil each other Our forwards don't create separation from their opponent. Our key forwards aren't taking enough marks Our key forwards aren't kicking enough goals. Change the line coach. *Also, don't pot coaches? Have you read this [censored] forum? Hahahahahahaha. Where are all the critics who wanted Goodwin sacked? Where are they now? If Stafford can prove me wrong, how am I losing? That'll be a good thing. I just don't think he can.
  24. Ham replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Why is Weideman seeking out advice from J.Brown? St. Kilda quelled that type of behaviour straight away, as they wanted to back in their own. MFC didn't back Stafford in at all, just openly let it happen? He is not the right person for the job, employ a forward/kicking coach.
  25. Ham replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Blaming the club for employing a ruckman as a forward/kicking coach. Go and employ the right person for the job.