adonski

I was sceptical too but we've traded Weid for a pick in the 30's and recruited an equivalent depth replacement for a future 4th rounder Absurdly good business

Rotate him between both

Wow!

37! Unreal!

One spot reserved for Andy Brayshaw and the other for Naughton

Ash is a plodder, has looked bog average at the giants Perhaps if they play him in the natural role as a half back he'd be a bit more appealing

"Lachie Hunter....sort of trying to get to Melbourne, looking more unlikely than likely at this point...with that being said there's still a lot that can happen in the next day and a half" - Tom 'Tom Brown' Brown

Any chance of Tom Morris breaking the news via Twitter?

I'd give Bowey a crack on the kick ins. Has the speed to get the handball receive if he hits up a short target.

Don't quite understand the logic in trading Weid only to bring the Shach Attack in, but at the end of the day who really cares about either

If we're taking two picks to the draft, we're trading back into the at least the second round if not the 1st

New display pic incoming...

Jefferson whilst slim looks a weapon

We'll use 27 + whatever we get for Weid traded onto Collingwood for Grundy It'll be no fuss in the end, you're all so dramatic!

Trade for Jeelongs pick 25 Then Jeelong can offer 27 for Henry!

Collingwood are threatening to hang on to Brodie Grundy after Melbourne refused a proposal to swap first round picks as part of the deal for the ruckman, which came on a busy day of trades which saw the Demons finally complete a three-club deal to get Luke Jackson to Fremantle. Melbourne have refused to offer more than pick 27 for the two-time All-Australian ruckman, who is contracted to Collingwood for five more years on big money. Collingwood have offered to pay some of Grundy’s contract at Melbourne. Collingwood had said at the outset of trade talks they wanted a draft pick inside 25 for Grundy. In early trades Melbourne secured pick 27, a selection Collingwood said is insufficient on its own to do the Grundy deal. On Monday Melbourne received pick 13 as part of the exchange that saw Jackson finally land at Fremantle. Collingwood have proposed trading Grundy and pick 16 to Melbourne for the Demons’ picks 13 and 27. Melbourne has rejected this. Collingwood could alternatively seek to revise down slightly the amount of money they contribute to Grundy’s salary in exchange for accepting the slightly later pick. The club has also said they are prepared to keep the ruckman and abandon the trade. https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/collingwood-threatens-to-hang-on-to-grundy-dockers-secure-jackson-bombers-snare-setterfield-suns-giants-make-moves-20221010-p5bonr.html

We'll get our top 10 pick from Freo in 12 months

Staggered we didn't get Andy Brayshaw in exchange for butterfingers

He'll be playing for the giants by 2026 anyways

Hopefully it's the 2nd rounder tied to Norf coming back

We could be trading out the two worst marks at the club on the same day

Me too. Not that we'll let them know that.

Not that it matters, but I don't think their offer is 'fair' Whether you think Jackson is a potential superstar, or will 'only' be a good player, it's hard to argue he hasn't at least maintained his original draft value of pick 3 Pick 13 + Pick (12-18?) wouldn't net pick 3 in a trade If the argument is purely about him being out of contract, why don't they just offer pick 50?

I assume/hope we're pushing for North's 2023 2nd round pick, traded to Fremantle for Logue, as the icing on top of the Jackson deal. If we can get our hands on it, I think we'll try to trade it + Bedford for pick 15, held by GWS. Giants would be one of the teams more likely to push picks back given how many they'll have (picks 18 & 19 may also come under consideration). Bedford + 2023 2nd rounder tied to North (pick ~20) for pick 15 would value Bedford @ pick 56 - slight unders, but that's the cost of trading forward