M C

We can't go into next season with all 4 of Garland, Howe, Cross and Grimes, right? Howe - Likely gone at end of season Cross - May retire this year, will definitely be rested if he plays on next year Grimes - Garland is far better than, otherwise Grimes would be in the side But by all means, get rid of Garland.

He can still be traded...

For context: 13/6/15 Greenvale: 48.17 - 305 Northern Saints: 1.6 - 12

Looks like no bbq's in the carpark then

I think it's extremely unfair to group Jamar, Dunn and Garland in with Sylvia and Frawley. I'm adamant that the first three have given their all for this club, and I will always respect them for that.

james harmes ‏@jamesharmes @nathan2jones thanks mate can't wait to run out next to you skip !!

Out: Hocking - 104 games Melksham - 102 games In: Ashby - 8 games Edwards - 14 games

I'd offer our first rounder + Howe, and that still probably wouldn't get it done

No point in elevating him if you're not going to play him in the seniors. Elevate him, play him in the VFL, he does his hammy and is out for 4 - spot on the senior list wasted.

I'm not sure it's appropriate to suggest that CB would prefer Mitch Clark dead. Nor do I think it's appropriate to use the recent tragedy to further your own agenda. Regardless, my view is that if Mitch Clark wasn't 'mentally stable' (for lack of a better term) enough to continue at Melbourne, then he shouldn't have continued his AFL career at all. If Mitch Clark was willing to work in a high pressure environment like the AFL, and subject himself to the pressures of the media, then there is no doubt in my mind that he could have continued at Melbourne. If he had expressed even the slightest desire to repay the faith the Melbourne Football Club showed him, then he would have had the support of thousands of fans, including me. Instead, he chose to leave, and that is why I have zero respect for him.

Have you seen Daniher try to kick it recently? We want the ball in his hands!

Essendon probably looking at another rebuild Might be able to pick off some players

Does Dunn get the goal assist there?

I thought Matt Jones might be useful on Hurn

Are you seriously using that as a measure of a player's consistency? Take Bernie Vince for example, a player I and many others on here would class as a very consistent performer. http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Ratings/Player/110760/Bernie-VINCE Was rated an 8+ three times this year, yet has also managed to score 4 on four different occasions. It's obvious that you don't watch GC games at all, otherwise you would know how good Bennell has been this year.

No, not at all. Dawes will receive credit when he is deserving, just as he did after the Adelaide game last year. But he hasn't produced anything near that level this year.

And Salem!

Wasn't putting words in your mouth. Your post just came across as if you thought the game wasn't 'serious' enough so they might as well go to the complete opposite end of the spectrum.

Lighten up a bit mate. Once you realise that it's not meant to be a serious game with fast ball movement and good skills, it's actually pretty enjoyable to watch. All just a bit of fun for a good cause

I don't see why you're worrying? More wins = More memberships It's as simple as that

Ablett made them do this?

Yep. While a lot of them may have talent, the last thing we want is a bunch of Sam Bleases running around who don't give a flying [censored]. And I'm not sure a lot of other clubs would either. GC could be stuck with them.

Supposedly, so were Geelong

I think the careless grading is in reference to Buddy making contact with Edwards' head. i.e. He may have laid an illegal tackle etc but it was not his intention to make contact with Edwards' head

Still, how many players on our list can play like him, regardless of the opposition?