M C

No chance

GC get our first round draft selection next year. We do not get the opportunity to trade it down for another first round pick and then give that to GC, because we will never receive next year's first rounder. It goes straight to GC

Didn't test well at the combine, which concerned me at first but most don't think it's an issue Apparently is a very natural footballer

Mate, leucopogon was talking about GCS, not GWS. He even says 'GCS' in his post

We didn't trade Howe and 63 for Kennedy. What we did do though was trade Howe and Toumpas for Kennedy, pick 29 and pick 50. What do you mean "negotiating 101"? Making 'bold statements' is a negotiating tactic. Did you not hear Brisbane stating that Aish would not be traded at all two weeks ago? And yet now he will likely end up at Collingwood. Or GWS' claim that Boyd would not be traded last year, yet i'm pretty sure he's at the doggies now. Clubs 'cave' all the time - it's called meeting in the middle.

In what scenario is letting Howe go in the draft a good decision?

Well, no, if you read it you would see it said "Collingwood received pick 32 which it traded on to Melbourne"

- inconsistent - huge positives, hogan, viney, brayshaw, Gawn, Salem etc - list still lacks depth, is the reason for inconsistency - Goodwin will begin taking over this year - percent improved, but needs to happen more rapidly - scoring needs to improve - uncertain on where we will be at end of season - led by Viney and brayshaw in the future - sees petracca as a high half forward, moving into the middle - club needs frost and Oscar to succeed - needs to recruit/trade in more players who can kick - forward line a disaster - hogan, Garlett the only decent forwards, maybe petracca - curnow won't be there at pick 6 - looking at bugg, Kennedy - loss of Howe not a big deal - no doubt that we will improve, but unsure whether we will actually move forward as a club (on the ladder) - prediction for next year: no movement (I.e. 13th) - improvement will come in 2017, once Roos has moved on

If we get two 2nd rounders from the Pies then they will be late 2nd rounders Prestia is not worth less than pick 8 as you claim. In your scenario, we would be trading pick 8 for Prestia and an upgrade from pick 6 to pick 3, which is ridiculously in our favour

100%

Won best performer at the combine

Clearly Redden is coming to the dees Dazzle 3rd rounder should get it done?

Malceski is far better than Suckling and look how much he struggled this year (prior to his injury especially) I envisage a similar thing happening if Suckling were to come to the dees

Depends on where the mrp's wheel of misfortune lands

Very impressed by his efforts eariler in the year Would love him at the dees

I think he deserves another chance

No way he leaves for "nothing" though

I don't think Bennell has a meth addiction

my apologies mate

Why don't I throw some other names at you then Pavlich, Franklin, Riewoldt, Roughead There's definitely an element of risk to drafting KPF's early, but to compare Weideman to Cook or Molan is unfair on him. Every chance he could be just as good as the other names I listed

Sounds like complete bs The good kind of bs

#JesseHogan2016

Off the top of my head JRoo and Hanners both re-signed this year, not sure if any others have

Who was 'wetting themselves' exactly? It was just generating a bit of discussion I don't see how mentioning Tommy's comment could be anything other than harmless

The Swans signed Robinson as a 14 year old Imo there is no chance he moves clubs