TeamPlayedFine39

He was delisted today... the Crows showed him very little loyalty...

If anyone's ever wondered why so many good players have left... we're getting an insight into the reason.

I don't understand Adelaide's gameplan here... the best thing that can possibly happen for them is if Lever says he's willing to possibly consider a different Victorian club to get his old club a better deal. Any chance of any good faith from the Lever camp is now shot to hell by the aggressive attitude of every official and players who comments have been made public. If they ever wonder why quality players are leaving their club, look to their attitudes and player relationships.

Because, despite appearances, he was deceptively strong and incredibly well balanced.

Agreed, he's moved off the ball and has his approach blocked - that gives the impression he is out of position. If it's still happening in a year or two, then we have real issues. He's a junior player on the list - he needs to fill out.

Draft predictions are never accurate this far out. I remember people salivating a year early over the 'certain' 1,2,3 of Scully, Lucas and Butcher.

Well, don't i look the fool! I guess the point i was trying to make is that I wonder what we could down grade our pick 10 for this year and what could we get in return. Would make a two first rounder trade a lot better for us.

My bad. I would hope, for equality's sake, it would take more than pick 16/17 to get a player of Stringer's quality- especially whilst under contract.

Adelaide want two first rounders... How about we trade pick 10 to Geelong for Blicavs or Menzel and pick 16-18. We trade Geelong's first pick and our 2018 first pick to Adelaide. Adelaide get their two first round picks. Geelong get pick ten to use on Stringer or Ablett. Melbourne get Lever and Blicavs/Menzel.

I'm genuinely concerned that I might be sick of Jake Lever before he even arrives at the MFC...

He questions the asking price of two first rounders, as most of us do.

Might be trying to off load only one of them and it could possibly be for the pick they're looking for, not the money. Would be strange to trade Salem after just re-signing him... (I thought you couldn't trade a player in their first year of contract... or did i imagine that..??)

Who are they..? If we can talk so openly about Lever, why not them..?

Wonder if they literally mean two first round picks or if the mean pick 10, plus another first round pick. Could we, for example, trade down our pick 10 to pick 17 before we forward it to Adelaide with next years..??

If that could be negotiated down to 10 & 45 for Lever, we'd be laughing.

I think our Football Department staff should stare at a picture of Scott Thompson for three minutes without blinking, before entering into any negotiations. The football world hasn't played fair with the MFC in the past, we're under no obligation to pay more than we absolutely have to for Lever.

Would not include either of those with pick 10- especially not Hunt.

UNDERSTANDING RICKY NIXON TWEETS....

Connors can say what he likes - he isn't Lever's manager.

He is, but his signing was hardy 'HUGE' at the time. If we land Lever it'll be the first time in god knows how long that a top line player picks us.

When was the last time we traded in a top 50 player? Hibberd certainly wasn't top 50 when we signed him...

We don't have a proven history of being able to get the 'big trades' done. Getting what would be two massive trades done in one trade period would be unprecedented in modern MFC history. One of these is possible and, in Lever's case, looks almost likely.

Would have been nice if Goodwin had of told him to take it easy 10 weeks ago...

What's the 'knock on him'? Any idea what's stopped him being drafted the last few years or is he new to footy??