Elusive Tunbridge

Let's just say I've watched more games than I've played, dc.

I guess you're keeping this going because you're embarrassed that no-one takes your source, a scientology front organisation, seriously. Calling your stance scepticism may give you a warm feeling, but it's not so impressive since the climate denialists hijacked the word. Questioning my credentials is another weak smokescreen, like asking "How many games of AFL have you played?" But the short answer to your question is "Yes".

If they don't take that down by Monday I'll cease posting as soon as I've microwaved my membership.

Your logic trips over the difference between everything and anything. But you don't have to believe this.

The CCHR link is very dodgy material - akin to anti-vaccination stuff. Severe depression is a well acknowledged medical condition. Depression may be a reason for taking poor decisions, but it's not an excuse. The black dog bites dogs, too. We boo the dog, not the bite.

You can lock the asylum gates, but you can't keep the lunatics inside.

Warm, wet pockets all around.

It's not a problem. It's only automatic when, as often happens, his name is misspelt with an "o" instead of the second "e". Next stop "Gartlett". Respect, blokes.

33K tomorrow, final total I'll guess at 37. 40 still too far away.

It's horrible, it's distracting, it's visual white noise. It's part of the enhanced game-day experience. Eventually this sort of garbage will drive me away from the game.

Saty, you get bored by other people's posts the way dogs get bored with bones.

Av - or maybe AvB.

Must be a bittersweet moment for him. 200 is such a great achievement, but without any of his black-and-white teammates around him - not even Dawes!

It's a good group of players, but given the number playing their first game or second season in the jumper, I'll be very agreeably surprised if they click as a team in the first half of the season.

Do we have to over analyse everything? Too much analysis is never enough.

Should have kept it in house, where it belonged. I like good standup, but that was a Sportsman's Night.

If the Bombers only get six months, Pie fans will be enraged. AFL will be engulfed in a tidal wave of urine.

Could hardly come at a worse time for Essendon.

Article hints that the drugs are recreational, therefore no team penalty. (OOPS! misread the article. Very bad - but still doubt that there can be a team penalty.)

Got about halfway through before the gag reflex.

OBVIOUS is your middle name, picket.

Sounds like a good idea. And at this time, late March, how should we do that? (Rhetorical question - of course I expect you to have NFI.)

So, a previously unknown football club beat a previously well-known football club. What's your point?

I wonder if Hunter is doing this off his own bat, or is perhaps a stalking horse for other players, particularly those now at other clubs?

Reading this thread, my one thought is that nobody has a clue.