Jump to content

Featured Replies

I think we could do worse than pick up Josh Walker, delisted by Brisbane and can play both ends.

Great size too at 196cm and 101kg.

 
17 hours ago, einstein251 said:

I think that at some stage the club regarded Preuss as a tall forward/rucking option but that idea seems to have been shelved.

Not sure about that...he is a good long kick and may show up from 50metre mark next year. 

2 hours ago, bingers said:

Lynch is 199 cm (he's huge), Gunston 193 cm. 

Fritsch is 188 cm. But agree with you that he plays tall.

Wrong Lynch 'bingers'...the Adelaide variety.

...and whilst I understand Gunston's height he doesn't play as a tall pack crasher & take a lot of big pack marks. He's more an accumulator who relies on a great kick.

...Fritsch probably plays taller than both although he is not as tall physically.

 

The only quality forward available in this trade period was Elliot.

He chose not to come.

Others like Jenkins, Bruce etc would not have added anything and weren't worth pursuing.

They could indeed have been seen as a backwards step.

I think the club have done all they could to address deficiencies on our list.

Adding run on the wings allows our mids to spend more time forward, it allows Brayshaw to play where he plays his best, it allows Oliver to spend some time forward and develop that side of his game.

We go to the draft and hopefully take 2 quality players who can add more to our forward half and or better delivery inside 50...

So whilst we didn't add any class KPF's to our list non were available.

We go in looking for improvement in Tmac, Weid, Trac, Fritsch forward, game plan, fitness & delivery.

I think many we will be pleasantly surprised, some even eating their words.

 

 

If I'm reading this correctly it seems that the concern relates more to what we do if either or both of our main spearheads gets injured again more so than whether we have enough tall targets sans injury.

However, we shouldn't let our fear of the unknown (injury) distract us from the far more important issue of everyone playing and executing their role as instructed. Yes, it's that old chestnut of system versus personnel again and for me it's by far the best contingency for troops that fall during the next campaign. 

Having now addressed the issue of outside run we can reasonably expect to see the ball being delivered inside fifty more swiftly and more often, thus allowing our forwards (whoever they are on a given day) better opportunities to lead and mark into space. However the need to either recruit or develop a quality crumbing forward is crucial to having the multi faceted forward line we require for the coming season. 

Edited by Rab D Nesbitt


Not that I have massive hopes for this, but I believe they’ll try Joel Smith in that 3rd tall position as he’s very agile and a strong mark. We saw it in the JLT before injury ruined his season. 

I also believe that we think we can get greater goal output from some of our mids. With Tomlinson coming in we have the option of having him take the back up ruck rather than TMac, which robbed us of goal power up forward. And we can also rest Gawn up forward for greater periods of time as a result. 

With May and Lever fit, and a tall in Tomlinson on the wing, it makes our reliance on Gawn to plug those holes in the defensive 50 a lot less critical. 

People may not rate Tomlinson but I think from a structural point of view he will prove absolutely vital and will free up a lot more options. 
 

Edited by Jaded

On 10/19/2019 at 12:19 PM, Chelly said:

It seems to me that this 3rd tall forward to kick 50 goals is a bit of an elusive character. 

Are there any decent ones seriously available now that the trades are over?

Only 6 players kicked 50 or more goals in the league.

Another 5 40 plus

Another 18 30 plus

so in all the league only 29 players kicked 30 plus goals for the season.

Tigers had Lynch 63 & Martin 32. Of course Riewoldt missed a lot of games.

Your lucky to get one player kick over 50 let alone 2 in any teams forward line, looking for three is wishful thinking!

TMac needs to find form and we need improvement and players on the park out of

Fritsch

Petracca

Melksham

Weideman

JSmith

and maybe someone to surprise! Maybe more goals from Oliver spending some time forward.

No magic solutions but would be great for us to draft or find out next Jeff Farmer!!

 

I think we need a first tall in reality we really don't have one at the moment

The FD have bet the house on TMac and Wied coming good.

I hope they are right as we appear to have the same dysfunctional forward set up as last year

 
9 minutes ago, Kent said:

I think we need a first tall in reality we really don't have one at the moment

The FD have bet the house on TMac and Wied coming good.

I hope they are right as we appear to have the same dysfunctional forward set up as last year

This post makes no sense...

I agree we need a first tall.

...but there were none available.

They haven't bet the house but they also can't conjure something up if it's not there.

 

6 minutes ago, rjay said:

This post makes no sense...

I agree we need a first tall.

...but there were none available.

They haven't bet the house but they also can't conjure something up if it's not there.

 

Maybe Josh Bruce should have been considered as discussed elsewhere


1 minute ago, Kent said:

Maybe Josh Bruce should have been considered as discussed elsewhere

Josh Bruce is pretty 'meh' to me.

He had five games where he went goalless and seven where he kicked just one goal. 

His two big games from this year were when he kicked 4 on us (not hard) and 6 against Norf.  Hardly the sort of stats to get excited about.

11 minutes ago, Kent said:

Maybe Josh Bruce should have been considered as discussed elsewhere

Josh Bruce is in the same boat as Tommy, not a first tall.

I would have an in form Tommy ahead of him.

You want a 3rd tall to kick 50!

Hogan never kicked 50.

Only TMac in recent times has kicked 50 and we still have him. I think with less injuries next season our forward line will be much better. But dreaming of a 3rd tall to kick 50 is a dream.

1 hour ago, rjay said:

Josh Bruce is in the same boat as Tommy, not a first tall.

I would have an in form Tommy ahead of him.

So would I !!

Unfortunately we didn't have an in form Tommy this year and there is no guarantee (Given the absence of any plausible excuses)

that we will have an inform Tommy next year.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 163 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 45 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies