Jump to content

Riddle Me This

Featured Replies

19 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Don't worry DZ I have informed Commissioner Gorden of the problem. He said he knows someĀ people who can deal with the Riddler!Ā 

Good one Earl, love it , cracked me up ??

Ā 
42 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Don't worry DZ I have informed Commissioner Gorden of the problem. He said he knows someĀ people who can deal with the Riddler!Ā 

Gold

1 hour ago, DeeZee said:

Explain how a nonĀ sensical riddle with no answer is an excercise for the brain, when no answer exists even well after the trade period has ended?

Not to mention zero contact from the poster who started the thread?

To quote the Joker: "Why so serious?".

 

So in a bid to beat a confession from the source - clues to the Riddler’s identity . . .

It could reasonably be assumed that the Riddler is not Jim Carrey. It might also be safe to assume that he’s an MFC fan and graces this site in another guise. A quick squiz of bomberblitz (shudder) confirms that there is no such Riddler riling up the Essendon fandom – although a question of complexity might be pointless

over there. Is it Hird? Is it Hird? Is it Hird?Ā 

The Riddler first surfaced in 2014. With a confident opening, I would suggest an active member who predates this time.

He mentioned that the mystery player was from interstate. This may well have been a trap, but it may just rule out Chook in Perth and I think Crazy Jaeger O'Smearer.

The Riddler previously said he had a link to an MFC board-member of 'two first names'. This may be completely fabricated of course - but be it Steven Morris or David Robb - let's surmise that the Riddler is acquainted and then of at least semi-mature years. This rules out 25% of Demonland.

These following folk have checked out the Riddler's profile page in the past ten hours: Monoccular, Member's Wing, Redbeard, 45HG & CarntheDees. I also saw Nasher stalking the other day. This may be a decent alibi - or, alternatively, may suggest the sort of psychopath who gets their kicks from sticking around the scene of their crime.

Indeed, I wouldn't be surprised if the Riddler has posted in this very thread in an attempt to throw off the scent . . .

Ā 

Explain how a nonĀ sensical riddle with no answer is an excercise for the brain, when no answer exists even well after the trade period has ended?

Not to mention zero contact from the poster who started the thread?

Nowhere does he say that it will be this trade period.

Ā 

Ā 

So in a bid to beat a confession from the source - clues to the Riddler’s identity . . .

It could reasonably be assumed that the Riddler is not Jim Carrey. It might also be safe to assume that he’s an MFC fan and graces this site in another guise. A quick squiz of bomberblitz (shudder) confirms that there is no such Riddler riling up the Essendon fandom – although a question of complexity might be pointless

Ā 

over there. Is it Hird? Is it Hird? Is it Hird?Ā 

Ā 

The Riddler first surfaced in 2014. With a confident opening, I would suggest an active member who predates this time.

Ā 

He mentioned that the mystery player was from interstate. This may well have been a trap, but it may just rule out Chook in Perth and I think Crazy Jaeger O'Smearer.

The Riddler previously said he had a link to an MFC board-member of 'two first names'. This may be completely fabricated of course - but be it Steven Morris or David Robb - let's surmise that the Riddler is acquainted and then of at least semi-mature years. This rules out 25% of Demonland.

These following folk have checked out the Riddler's profile page in the past ten hours: Monoccular, Member's Wing, Redbeard, 45HG & CarntheDees. I also saw Nasher stalking the other day. This may be a decent alibi - or, alternatively, may suggest the sort of psychopath who gets their kicks from sticking around the scene of their crime.

Indeed, I wouldn't be surprised if the Riddler has posted in this very thread in an attempt to throw off the scent . . .

Ā 

simpsons-shifty-dog-o.gif

Ā 


Ā 

To quote the Joker: "Why so serious?".

I'd understand that if it was actually funny

Ā 

Nowhere does he say that it will be this trade period.

Ā 

simpsons-shifty-dog-o.gif

Ā 

Even worse, so this means he is going to string us along for another 12 months?

God forbid

Ā 

So in a bid to beat a confession from the source - clues to the Riddler’s identity . . .

It could reasonably be assumed that the Riddler is not Jim Carrey. It might also be safe to assume that he’s an MFC fan and graces this site in another guise. A quick squiz of bomberblitz (shudder) confirms that there is no such Riddler riling up the Essendon fandom – although a question of complexity might be pointless

Ā 

over there. Is it Hird? Is it Hird? Is it Hird?Ā 

Ā 

The Riddler first surfaced in 2014. With a confident opening, I would suggest an active member who predates this time.

Ā 

He mentioned that the mystery player was from interstate. This may well have been a trap, but it may just rule out Chook in Perth and I think Crazy Jaeger O'Smearer.

The Riddler previously said he had a link to an MFC board-member of 'two first names'. This may be completely fabricated of course - but be it Steven Morris or David Robb - let's surmise that the Riddler is acquainted and then of at least semi-mature years. This rules out 25% of Demonland.

These following folk have checked out the Riddler's profile page in the past ten hours: Monoccular, Member's Wing, Redbeard, 45HG & CarntheDees. I also saw Nasher stalking the other day. This may be a decent alibi - or, alternatively, may suggest the sort of psychopath who gets their kicks from sticking around the scene of their crime.

Indeed, I wouldn't be surprised if the Riddler has posted in this very thread in an attempt to throw off the scent . . .

Ā 

I'm with you Skuit, it may even be you, very clever.Ā 

I have enjoyed the riddle and couldn't care less if there is an answer or not. For riddle haters,Ā stay away next time. No it's not me.

I love a good riddle, this isĀ not a good riddle.

Ā 
Ā 

I love a good riddle, this isĀ not a good riddle.

Perhaps because you have not worked it out.

Ā 

As long as there is actually an answer, yeah...

The answer is 42 of course. Ā Pat McKenna was #42 at GWS.


Ā 

Perhaps because you have not worked it out.

Yes , but neither hasĀ anyone else with Trade period being finished and no comment from the initiator.

Have been thinking about it more and I think the Riddles really needs to tell us, even if it was a hoax.

I think it is Nat Fyfe.

Butter, a few links, a bloke called Fyfe invented deep fried butter and muso has a song about butter and eggs. Nat butter is also a rather disgusting term for secretions on the end of a dog's old fella.Ā 

Wings, he has the wings photo copying Jordan.

Ocean, he is a docker so is tied to the Ocean. A bloke with the surname of Fyfe is also one of the most famous wooden boat designers of the early and mid 20th century. One of his boats is for sale in Vic at the minute for over 500,000 euro. There aren't many boats in Vic worth that much full stop.Ā 

He is also from interstate but that all depends on which state you start from.Ā 

Ā 

Have been thinking about it more and I think the Riddles really needs to tell us, even if it was a hoax.

I think it is Nat Fyfe.

Butter, a few links, a bloke called Fyfe invented deep fried butter and muso has a song about butter and eggs. Nat butter is also a rather disgusting term for secretions on the end of a dog's old fella.Ā 

Wings, he has the wings photo copying Jordan.

Ocean, he is a docker so is tied to the Ocean. A bloke with the surname of Fyfe is also one of the most famous wooden boat designers of the early and mid 20th century. One of his boats is for sale in Vic at the minute for over 500,000 euro. There aren't many boats in Vic worth that much full stop.Ā 

He is also from interstate but that all depends on which state you start from.Ā 

Jesus, that is grim.

Your evidence adds up quite nicely, but the boat designer's name was actually spelt 'Fife'. Close enough though!

Ā 

Explain how a nonĀ sensical riddle with no answer is an excercise for the brain, when no answer exists even well after the trade period has ended?

Not to mention zero contact from the poster who started the thread?

Riddler is too deep in contemplation of his next riddler reply to us imbecilesĀ 

Ā 

So in a bid to beat a confession from the source - clues to the Riddler’s identity . . .

It could reasonably be assumed that the Riddler is not Jim Carrey. It might also be safe to assume that he’s an MFC fan and graces this site in another guise. A quick squiz of bomberblitz (shudder) confirms that there is no such Riddler riling up the Essendon fandom – although a question of complexity might be pointless

Ā 

over there. Is it Hird? Is it Hird? Is it Hird?Ā 

Ā 

The Riddler first surfaced in 2014. With a confident opening, I would suggest an active member who predates this time.

Ā 

He mentioned that the mystery player was from interstate. This may well have been a trap, but it may just rule out Chook in Perth and I think Crazy Jaeger.

The Riddler previously said he had a link to an MFC board-member of 'two first names'. This may be completely fabricated of course - but be it Steven Morris or David Robb - let's surmise that the Riddler is acquainted and then of at least semi-mature years. This rules out 25% of Demonland.

These following folk have checked out the Riddler's profile page in the past ten hours: Monoccular, Member's Wing, Redbeard, 45HG & CarntheDees. I also saw Nasher stalking the other day. This may be a decent alibi - or, alternatively, may suggest the sort of psychopath who gets their kicks from sticking around the scene of their crime.

Indeed, I wouldn't be surprised if the Riddler has posted in this very thread in an attempt to throw off the scent . . .

Ā 

Of course it could be one of those he mentioned - interstate to most of us is anywhere out of Victoria, but if the poster was from Perth then Victoria would be interstate Ā 

Ā 

Yes , but neither hasĀ anyone else with Trade period being finished and no comment from the initiator.

Unless he has somehow defied the rules and obtained a second identity.Ā 


Ā 

Ā 

Unless he has somehow defied the rules and obtained a second identity.Ā 

The conspiracy goes all the way to the top

Ā 

I'm with you Skuit, it may even be you, very clever.Ā 

I have enjoyed the riddle and couldn't care less if there is an answer or not. For riddle haters,Ā stay away next time. No it's not me.

ManDee - I'm not sure that just denying you're the Riddler is sufficient evidence in this climate of suspicion and uncertainty. By necessity, the onus of disproof is on you. Me? I went to a public school so there's absolutely no way I'm acquainted with anyone even mildly related to the MFC. Though I was chatting to a NMFC board member by chance last week . . .Ā  Ā  Ā 

Ā 

we need to get the afl integrity unit onto this

oh, wait

That would only work if the Riddler has integrity as theĀ integrity unit can sniffĀ out if someone has integrityĀ quick smart and make sure who ever has any has nothing to do with their organisation.

Ā 

ManDee - I'm not sure that just denying you're the Riddler is sufficient evidence in this climate of suspicion and uncertainty. By necessity, the onus of disproof is on you. Me? I went to a public school so there's absolutely no way I'm acquainted with anyone even mildly related to the MFC. Though I was chatting to a NMFC board member by chance last week . . .Ā  Ā  Ā 

I may have some explaining to do, I did go to a private school, I am a member of the MCC and did speak to $cully regarding continuingĀ his tenure at the club, fortunately it fell upon deaf ears. But I can absolutely guarantee I do not have two identities on Demonland, but do I have three, or four?


Maybe it's GNF...didn't he lead a merry chase last year over Dangerfield (I think it was)?

Ā 
Ā 

Seems a reasonable alibi.

No further discussion needed on this matter.

Ā 

I may have some explaining to do, I did go to a private school, I am a member of the MCC and did speak to $cully regarding continuingĀ his tenure at the club, fortunately it fell upon deaf ears. But I can absolutely guarantee I do not have two identities on Demonland, but do I have three, or four?

GoodnessĀ gracious me! Ā Do they allow such folk in now? ?


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facingĀ Ā intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April.Ā 

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’sĀ performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 132 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies