Wish we had Mclean back, this kid has been useless.

I've often wondered if there's anything you could write on a web forum that's so obviously sarcastic that nobody - not one single person - would be dumb enough to take it literally.

Mr. Morton, I think you've found it. Well played, sir. You win the internet.

After a depressing week on Demonland its nice to be able to celebrate some good news that we can all agree on

Interesting to note that he said Gotchy had been implementing Melbournes game plan at Casey, I though we didn't have a game plan!

"Excellent Smither's...Yes"

I've often wondered if there's anything you could write on a web forum that's so obviously sarcastic that nobody - not one single person - would be dumb enough to take it literally.

Mr. Morton, I think you've found it. Well played, sir. You win the internet.

Thanks

Wish we had Mclean back, this kid has been useless.

You really ARE joking !!! McLean ???? Gysberts would leave him in his dust and you may well see that happen if Carlton ever pick him again ???

What a strange comment.. Good move for the week by the Mighty Dees.

Wish we had Mclean back, this kid has been useless.

HaHaHa! Crock has been Ripping it up with the Bullants.

Wish we had Mclean back, this kid has been useless.

I've often wondered if there's anything you could write on a web forum that's so obviously sarcastic that nobody - not one single person - would be dumb enough to take it literally. Mr. Morton, I think you've found it. Well played, sir. You win the internet.

But then ...

You really ARE joking !!! McLean ???? Gysberts would leave him in his dust and you may well see that happen if Carlton ever pick him again ???What a strange comment.. Good move for the week by the Mighty Dees.

I may have spoken too soon ... unless plg31ni is himself being sarcastic, in which case we're through the rabbit hole here, people. Argh, now my brain hurts.

Edited April 20, 201114 yr by bananas

I may have spoken too soon ... unless plg31ni is himself being sarcastic, in which case we're through the rabbit hole here, people. Argh, now my brain hurts.

You would really hope so wouldn't you....for his sake!!!!! B)

Could turn out to be the Wonder STAR.

This isn't going to become a thread about Scully, people.

This isn't going to become a thread about Scully, people.

Unless you have deleted posts, there is nothing about Scully...

Would it be safe to say, Gysberts has cemented his spot in the 22 if not 18?

Great News.

And whilst Nasher has asked for the thread not to become about scully i predict he'll sign in the next week or 2

Unless you have deleted posts, there is nothing about Scully...

Would it be safe to say, Gysberts has cemented his spot in the 22 if not 18?

I deleted about five of them.

I'd say Gysberts has shown more than enough to be in the starting side every week. He's already close to being our best clearence winner.

I think we're only Scully (yes I see the irony here) and McKenzie away from our best 22, and Gysberts is not in my thoughts of players who could make way for them.

Can anyone recall a "cleaner" first five games ?

Can anyone recall a "cleaner" first five games ?

Allen Jakovich ? Don't know about the "clean" bit, but at the time it was certainly a breath of fresh air...is that 'clean' enough ?

I think we're only Scully (yes I see the irony here) and McKenzie away from our best 22, and Gysberts is not in my thoughts of players who could make way for them.

I agree.

ahhhh some good news

Curry and Bear has some it up well. On ya young GIZMO!

I agree.

x2

I'd say Gysberts has shown more than enough to be in the starting side every week. He's already close to being our best clearence winner.

I deleted about five of them.

I'd say Gysberts has shown more than enough to be in the starting side every week. He's already close to being our best clearence winner.

I think we're only Scully (yes I see the irony here) and McKenzie away from our best 22, and Gysberts is not in my thoughts of players who could make way for them.

Delete this post.

(yes I see the irony here)