Jump to content

Predicting round one's defences

Featured Replies

Posted

Predicting round one's defences

Lists the Dee's starting defence as:

MELBOURNE

B: Jamie Bennell, James Frawley, Jared Rivers

HB: Joel Macdonald, Matthew Warnock, Jack Grimes

Bennell has had an excellent pre-season and looks set to assume the small running defender position vacated by the retired Matthew Whelan. Frawley is now a key tall and Rivers has had his best pre-season in years. He looks ready to build on his solid 2009 after managing just nine matches in the two previous seasons. Ex-Lion Macdonald steps in for the retired Paul Wheatley and Warnock is a now permanent fixture in the back six. Grimes could easy play in the midfield, but the club will be mindful he has only 12 games under his belt. His worth off half-back will be equally critical.

Think they pretty much nailed it, that's the exact 6 players I woudl pick. Only thing is I would switch Warnock and Frawley, as I like Chip much more at CHB as he's much faster and his run and carry is far superior to Warnock's.

For the record, they list the Hawks defence as:

HAWTHORN

B: Brent Guerra, Stephen Gilham, Josh Gibson

HB: Grant Birchall, Ryan Schoenmakers, Rick Ladson

Backline injuries were a big reason for Hawthorn's fall last year but at this stage the team looks close to full-strength. Expect Gilham and Ladson to slot back in while recruit Gibson is virtually guaranteed a walk-up start. Xavier Ellis and Clinton Young will press for spots across half-back as they return from injury but could also be used up the ground. Luke Hodge famously won his Norm Smith as a half-back general but indications are that he will play forward early on, as could Campbell Brown.

Edited by buddha82

 

I must say that is a pretty impressive back 6 for us - touch wood on injuries. To me the inclusion of 1 player (Joel Mac) has tipped the complexion of our defence from an up and comer to more like a men's department which all good defences should be. The best thing about it is that none of those players are over 25 yet and we have a fair range of youngsters and depth defenders who can fill in when required. Hopefully some other senior players like McDonald and Bruce won't be relied upon as much down the ground either and can also offer to help out down back when required.

 

Impressive.

yep..got ya the first time...lmao

on serious note ( F#) Our defence IS our best component...Has been for a few years. If we can refine and supplement it and continue to grow its gnarlyness (should there be such a word0 then this will be our lynch pin of success for some years. Whilst out midfield develops into a serious outfit and forwards tighten up and hurt the scoreboard then our defence will again be needed to take hits whilst containing damage.

On a brighter there are still a handful to slot in there should injury or redeployments require...thats good :)

hawthorn's backline looks very vulnerable. too bad we don't have bate or jamar training at full capacity. hopefully green will go forward and continue his pre-season form. morton possibly to go forward aswell

Edited by davey's gravy


Looks good. They are close but I reckon Bruce will spend more time down there than Grimes, and I'd like Rivers at HB with Bruce at BP. (Having seen Jamar last weekend, barring future mishaps he'll be right for round one and a big boost for us.)

Looks good. They are close but I reckon Bruce will spend more time down there than Grimes, and I'd like Rivers at HB with Bruce at BP. (Having seen Jamar last weekend, barring future mishaps he'll be right for round one and a big boost for us.)

MELBOURNE

B: Jamie Bennell, Matthew Warnock, Jared Rivers

HB: Joel Macdonald, James Frawley, Kyle Cheney

The above will be the six, with Jack Grimes either in the guts or playing on a wing.The six have great flexibility between them.The makings of a premiership backline.

Garland ?

 

What about stef martin if doesn't succeed in the ruck?

Considering a fit rivers warnock and frawley.


hawthorn's backline looks very vulnerable. too bad we don't have bate or jamar training at full capacity. hopefully green will go forward and continue his pre-season form. morton possibly to go forward aswell

Bate will be fit and firing for round one as will Jamar. Still six weeks til round one..

Garland ?

Just about a walk up start when fit I'd say. Problem Is who do we leave out? I'd like to see..

Bennell Warnock Rivers

Mcdonald Frawley Garland

We really have some depth to our backline now. Martin and Cheeney, Grimes, Bruce, Tommy Mac can all go through the backline.

Edited by J-Riv

Just about a walk up start when fit I'd say. Problem Is who do we leave out? I'd like to see..

Bennell Warnock Rivers

Mcdonald Frawley Garland

We really have some depth to our backline now. Martin and Cheeney, Grimes, Bruce, Tommy Mac can all go through the backline.

so can Morton, others Bail, Strauss, Bell and Bartram (you never know)

let's not forget Davey played off half-back most of last year!

So yeah that's 17 possible defenders for 6 spots in theory.... (!)

The backline has been made to look much worse than it is,due to a bit of instability caused by injuries, and the fact that heavily outgunned midfields have had them under siege most over the time.. the positive side is blokes like FRawley have been given a good fast-tracking in their development

  • Author

I was overseas for two years so am yet to see Garland play. From all reports he's a certain inclusion when fit. My only question is how does he play? I know he's tall, but can he play short and are his skills and speed good enough to play off a HBF?

Agreed that we'll probably see a bit of Bruce playing in place of Grimes, just as you'd think you'll see Cheney and McDonald playing in place of Bennell in the back pocket.

I like Cheney as a player but his skills and footy smarts aren't up to playing off half-back yet for mine, prefer to see him playing deeper.

I was overseas for two years so am yet to see Garland play. From all reports he's a certain inclusion when fit. My only question is how does he play? I know he's tall, but can he play short and are his skills and speed good enough to play off a HBF?

Agreed that we'll probably see a bit of Bruce playing in place of Grimes, just as you'd think you'll see Cheney and McDonald playing in place of Bennell in the back pocket.

I like Cheney as a player but his skills and footy smarts aren't up to playing off half-back yet for mine, prefer to see him playing deeper.

It sounds like hyperbole, but I reckon he moves like a skinny Matthew Scarlett.

Is definitely fast and mobile enough to play on the smalls.

Kicking skills are ok, but have never struck me as exceptionally good.

Better than Rivers at least.

Cheney's footy smarts are actually one of his strengths imho. But I agree that he is better deeper.


I was overseas for two years so am yet to see Garland play. From all reports he's a certain inclusion when fit. My only question is how does he play? I know he's tall, but can he play short and are his skills and speed good enough to play off a HBF?

Agreed that we'll probably see a bit of Bruce playing in place of Grimes, just as you'd think you'll see Cheney and McDonald playing in place of Bennell in the back pocket.

I like Cheney as a player but his skills and footy smarts aren't up to playing off half-back yet for mine, prefer to see him playing deeper.

Although Garland Is KP height he's quick and agile. He can play both tall and small. I think i recall him playing on Leon Davis then a few games later was playing on Buddy Franklin (was nominated for the rising star that game). Can also play forward as well as back. I wouldn't say he's a rebounding defender but he makes good decisions and Is mostly clean by hand and foot. I hope that helps you out.

About Bennell, I think he'll cement a spot If not this year then next. The kid can flat out play!

Edited by J-Riv

so can Morton, others Bail, Strauss, Bell and Bartram (you never know)

let's not forget Davey played off half-back most of last year!

So yeah that's 17 possible defenders for 6 spots in theory.... (!)

The backline has been made to look much worse than it is,due to a bit of instability caused by injuries, and the fact that heavily outgunned midfields have had them under siege most over the time.. the positive side is blokes like FRawley have been given a good fast-tracking in their development

Well... to be honest, your half-back-flankers play more like defensive midfielders these days and with rotations, picking a 'back 6' is almost obsolete.

About Bennell, I think he'll cement a spot If not this year then next. The kid can flat out play!

I think he already has - when was the last time he was dropped..?

I think he already has - when was the last time he was dropped..?

He was dropped for a while last year wasn't he? I remember watching him for Casey later In the year. Anyway I think he's held In high regard at the club, wont take long before he's a regular.


With no Franklin playing - could we afford to sit Matty Warnock out? I know he is a very handy defender and each year surprises me that he keeps improving but maybe Frawley and Rivers could be enough up against Roughead and possibly Dowler.

A lot depends on Garland - if he can play a preseason game and prove his form and fitness he must play.

I'm happy with Jamie Bennell, James Frawley and Jared Rivers being locked in at the moment, then would add 4 of Bruce, Macdonald, Warnock, Garland and depending on if he's not in the midfield Grimes or possibly the best performer out of Strauss/Cheney and all the other currently spare parts backmen McNamara (personal fave), Bell, Bartram, Bail.

Any chance we have of beating the hawks will need an inspired midfield performance - Jamar, Moloney, Jones and Davey and co will have the get on top of Spud Ruckmen and star midfield - Hodge, Mitchell, Burgoyne, Lewis, Sewell, Batemen, Ellis and co.

  • Author

Thanks for the heads up on Garland. Sounds like the complete package. Excited to see him running around, hopefully it's not too far away.

Hodge, Mitchell, Burgoyne, Lewis, Sewell, Batemen, Ellis and co.

That's a ridiculous midfield when you look at it isn't it. Bursting with talent. Hopefully in a few years we'll be looking at Trengove, Scully, Davey, Moloney, Jones, Blease, Gysberts and Tapscott in the same way.

Not sure about dropping Warnock but I see your point about having all 3 talls. Personally I think Warnock, along with Frawley and probably Rivers, would be three of the first names down on the sheet, would be surprised to see him dropped. Warnock to take any resting ruckman who wander down into the forward line? Not too sure what other talls the Hawks have in their forward given they barely get a look in with Buddy and Roughead in there.

With no Franklin playing - could we afford to sit Matty Warnock out? I know he is a very handy defender and each year surprises me that he keeps improving but maybe Frawley and Rivers could be enough up against Roughead and possibly Dowler.

A lot depends on Garland - if he can play a preseason game and prove his form and fitness he must play.

I'm happy with Jamie Bennell, James Frawley and Jared Rivers being locked in at the moment, then would add 4 of Bruce, Macdonald, Warnock, Garland and depending on if he's not in the midfield Grimes or possibly the best performer out of Strauss/Cheney and all the other currently spare parts backmen McNamara (personal fave), Bell, Bartram, Bail.

Any chance we have of beating the hawks will need an inspired midfield performance - Jamar, Moloney, Jones and Davey and co will have the get on top of Spud Ruckmen and star midfield - Hodge, Mitchell, Burgoyne, Lewis, Sewell, Batemen, Ellis and co.

I can see what your saying but I just cant see warnock getting left out. Id play Warnock on Roughie and Rivers on Dowler. Frawley to play smaller which he has In the past. Interesting to see If Garland Is fit enough for round 1.

 

Our Backline is still developing, we do not have depth. We have depth of talent but not proven players yet, not even close.

Guys like Strauss, Tommy Mac, Cheney, Bennell even Garland (being out for such a long time) are not proven players.

Judging by Hawthorn's back six, Jurrah will kick 9......... that's if Hawthorn's midfield allows us to get the ball in our forward 50 9 times....

For the record, my preferred back 6 is

Warnock, Frawley, Garland

McDonald, Rivers, Grimes

With Bennell to rotate through from the bench, freeing up Grimes for stints in the midfield.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 253 replies