Jump to content

Grimes II

Featured Replies

Posted

I'm a romantic and I want this kid at the club. Many of you will say his name and his allegiance should have no bearing on whether we take him or not but I am prepared to risk burning a pick on a potential spud for what the upside could be. He doesn't seem all that highly rated so there should be no trouble taking him at 34 or maybe even 50. In fact if he is there at 50 and we take someone else I'll be furious. Thoughts?

 

Consider if he is not good enough and has to be delisted, what impact could this have on the real Grimesayy

I'm a romantic and I want this kid at the club. Many of you will say his name and his allegiance should have no bearing on whether we take him or not but I am prepared to risk burning a pick on a potential spud for what the upside could be. He doesn't seem all that highly rated so there should be no trouble taking him at 34 or maybe even 50. In fact if he is there at 50 and we take someone else I'll be furious. Thoughts?

Not exactly furious and its relative to who else is left on the list, but I'd agree with you there.

Pick 50 would be ideal.

 
  • Author
Not exactly furious and its relative to who else is left on the list, but I'd agree with you there.

Pick 50 would be ideal.

surely there couldnt be another name worth taking at 50 in this particular draft. Remember we know that he is up in the highest bracket in terms of athletic ability and also is rated a 'top bloke' with leadership skills like Grimes I.

Does anyone have a clue if he is actually likely to be snapped up before then? I would have preferred him to tank the draft camp myself!

  • Author
Consider if he is not good enough and has to be delisted, what impact could this have on the real Grimesayy

none whatsoever IMO

i'm sure he'd be grateful for giving the kid a chance in the first place


Consider if he is not good enough and has to be delisted, what impact could this have on the real Grimesayy

Happens all the time.

Brett Voss..?

Xavier Clarke?

Rhys Shaw? Brayden Shaw even?

I'm sure there are heaps of others...

Anthony McDonald??

The Febeys?

A player would be stupid to tie his destiny to his brother who clearly would not be good enough (if he was in contention for delisting).

surely there couldnt be another name worth taking at 50 in this particular draft. Remember we know that he is up in the highest bracket in terms of athletic ability and also is rated a 'top bloke' with leadership skills like Grimes I.

Does anyone have a clue if he is actually likely to be snapped up before then? I would have preferred him to tank the draft camp myself!

Burgan (i think it was) rated him in the 35-50 bracket.

Not good enough for 34 or too good (likely gone) by 50?

 

There are a hoard of players rated around the 30-50 mark. There appears to be very little to distinguish, so taking him at 34 would not be worse than taking any of the others rated in that area. I certainly wouldn't be bothered by it. I think the fact that he is a mad Melbourne fan already is a bonus.

I have said this before, If grimes Mach II is anything special he will already be on our radar and he will already be on the draft list. The dees would have looked into him before anyone else given the talent his brother has. 30-50 are murky waters in this draft given how many top prospects will not enter the draft due to the GC having signed away some top talent. Selecting anyone at 34 or 50 is going to be tough to get right, so rolling the dice on a fairytale seems like a worthwhile cause.

If Dylan does not pan out and is delisted, I believe Jack will be fine as he has his own destiny to fulfill with this footy club. I doubt Grimes will be there at pick 50.


I hope that people realize that selecting his brother in a fairytale design will leave is with about 1/3 of a team of Grimes' in future years

I hope that people realize that selecting his brother in a fairytale design will leave is with about 1/3 of a team of Grimes' in future years

Ahh those "Y" chromosomes...

I see more upside in getting Patrick with 34 or 50 for possibly the exact same reasons!?

  • Author
I see more upside in getting Patrick with 34 or 50 for possibly the exact same reasons!?

does he have a gun brother at our club or what

does he have a gun brother at our club or what

No, but a gun cousin!


If Grimes is the best player available with pick 34 or 50, get him, otherwise, just go for the best available player.

The only issue with another club selecting him, is that Jack could want to leave later in order to play with his brother, or it could be the other way around and we could get Dylan cheap as he wants to come to the club.

I tend not to worry about it. Our recruitment staff will have the order of players they want at each pick, if he is best available im sure we will take him, but if someone they prefer more is still on the board then they wont.

They know more than us so i wont bother speculating.

I

d be quite happy getting both Grimes and Patrick with 34 and 50. I'd also be happy with many other players at those picks. I guess I'll just have to trust that out recruiting department are able to see which ones are worth the effort and grab them.

Just think......we get Dylann, and he turns out to have Jack's class, then a coup;e of years later, the THIRD, Demon supportying brother, Aaron becomes available!!! He also turns dut to reek class. And they're all Demons from birth.....AHHHHHH!..... Dream on Demons! Worth a punt!


  • Author
Just think......we get Dylann, and he turns out to have Jack's class, then a coup;e of years later, the THIRD, Demon supportying brother, Aaron becomes available!!! He also turns dut to reek class. And they're all Demons from birth.....AHHHHHH!..... Dream on Demons! Worth a punt!

that's the spirit!

as long as it doesn't end up a Collingwood Cloke situation

[quote name='Curry & Beer' as long as it doesn't end up a Collingwood Cloke situation

It wouldn't. Apparently all the boys are admirable characters like Jack.....a tribute to their Demon-loving Dad .

Our Danihers.

I've watched and rewatched everything I could get of Dylan, which isn't a lot but does show enough to be clear that he's no spud and would be very, very unlucky to be in the 'delisting' basket after a couple of years. GREAT closing speed. Has a bit of initiative. Smart and will keep learning. You'd have to be confident he'd be around and contributing long enough to make sure there were at least two Grimes' names permanently inscribed on lockers in our changerooms.

If you look at his little draft profile comments, he is one of very few who make a point of sayign they are passionate about the club they support, and exploring it further.

I'd say worth pick 34, and let's be sure that if he's till there for us at 50 then it's significantly because of unspoken graciousness by 15 other clubs. It would actually be one of those little moments where 'football wins'.

 
Our Danihers.

I've watched and rewatched everything I could get of Dylan, which isn't a lot but does show enough to be clear that he's no spud and would be very, very unlucky to be in the 'delisting' basket after a couple of years. GREAT closing speed. Has a bit of initiative. Smart and will keep learning. You'd have to be confident he'd be around and contributing long enough to make sure there were at least two Grimes' names permanently inscribed on lockers in our changerooms.

If you look at his little draft profile comments, he is one of very few who make a point of sayign they are passionate about the club they support, and exploring it further.

I'd say worth pick 34, and let's be sure that if he's till there for us at 50 then it's significantly because of unspoken graciousness by 15 other clubs. It would actually be one of those little moments where 'football wins'.

34 may not be enough, well according to Shifter Sheehan anyway.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tab...06/default.aspx

Doubt he'll be there at 50, his stocks have risen after his good performance at draft camp.

Hope we take him at 34 if he's there. Having Frank and Frank jnr on the list would be sensational but I'm not sure what to call a third Grimey

34 may not be enough, well according to Shifter Sheehan anyway.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tab...06/default.aspx

Doubt he'll be there at 50, his stocks have risen after his good performance at draft camp.

Hope we take him at 34 if he's there. Having Frank and Frank jnr on the list would be sensational but I'm not sure what to call a third Grimey

just read same article.. might be pumping up Dylan a wee bit being in op 30... 40 may be more realistic.. but as you suggest he wont be there at 50. Only caveat into this is any possible effect that recycleds might have pushing some picks further up.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 107 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 28 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 311 replies