hey- reading the paper this morning n seen two players have been put up for trade

both brad fisher and shane tuck have been told they will be up for trade, n both are still contracted

tell us what u think fisher 25 and tuck 28(prob too old)

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story...5012432,00.html

Edited September 12, 200916 yr by beamer22

No and no

Surprised Tuck is that old. If we are going to get an older player I would rather burgoyne.

Fisher is to small for the sort of player we need if we are going to trade for a forward.

Both are no good.

Surprised Tuck is that old. If we are going to get an older player I would rather burgoyne.

Fisher is to small for the sort of player we need if we are going to trade for a forward.

Both are no good.

yer i was quite suprised tuck was 28 too

i thought maybe fisher because he plays like a big forward

apparently burgoyne wants to move to hawks if anywhere

Fisher would be a bankrupt man's Robertson.

Only has a couple more years more in him than Robbo too

first rule of trade week.

don't trade for other club's list cloggers.

yer i was quite suprised tuck was 28 too

i thought maybe fisher because he plays like a big forward

apparently burgoyne wants to move to hawks if anywhere

Citation required????????

I reckon Tuck gets unfairly maligned.

As others have said, I am surprised he is as old as he is. Will fail to find a new club (and particularly ours) because of that. Clearly a decent AFL standard clearance player though and a ball magnet.

Fisher on the other hand would add nothing.

I reckon Tuck gets unfairly maligned.

As others have said, I am surprised he is as old as he is. Will fail to find a new club (and particularly ours) because of that. Clearly a decent AFL standard clearance player though and a ball magnet.

Fisher on the other hand would add nothing.

He does a lot of 'get footy, waste footy' but at least he gets it and puts up a fight, which is a lot better than a lot of tiges players

first rule of trade week.

don't trade for other club's list cloggers.

Spot on.

As others have said, I am surprised he is as old as he is.

In fact he is now older.

Older than he ever has been before.

In fact he is now older.

Touche

In fact he is now older.

pure platinum !!

wonder if he can play 10 more years like the other Tuck?

He didn't play an AFL game til he was about 24 so that's not surprising.

Wouldn't be too surprised if Sydney pick him up

i actually rate fisher.. very smart player but seems to have fallen out of favour at the blues since his injury.. maybe his form has gone backwards since the injury who knows... but yeh probably not big enough to hold down the big forward spot..

I reckon Tuck gets unfairly maligned.

As others have said, I am surprised he is as old as he is. Will fail to find a new club (and particularly ours) because of that. Clearly a decent AFL standard clearance player though and a ball magnet.

Fisher on the other hand would add nothing.

Brisbane Lions need an inside ball winner. He suits their window.

What's his weak areas, kicking?

No and no

Exactly what I was thinking.