Jump to content

DEPTH for Melbournefc

Featured Replies

Posted

Despite our position on the ladder and 3 wins from 18 games this year, I think we have improved; definitely on 2008 (3 wins); and I think we are on the way to a better list as well as a list with depth. I think our rucks still need improvement, and more pace around the midfield.

Below is a side I've picked for 2010. It doesn't include 2009 possible draftees (ie Scully, etc). Others may want to have a go at this. I'm sure there will be numerous permutations and combinations of a starting 22.

What my picked side relates to is the form of the players I have seen this season in form and looking forward. One that gives balance and yet doesn't include those who have been injured (Garland the exception), or yet to play, or those out of form )...(ie. Wonaeamirri, Blease, Strauss, Wheatley, Maric, Miller,...)

or even those we think will retire (McDonald).

At this stage, my starting side for 2010: -

B: Cheney Warnock Rivers

HB: Garland Frawley Bennell

C: Green Sylvia Davey

HF: Bruce Morton Petterd

F: Bate Watts Jurrah

FOLL: Jamar Moloney Grimes

INT: Martin Jones Dunn McLean

Missed: Wonna, Blease, Strauss, Maric, Newton, Miller, Wheatley, Jetta, Bail, Spencer, Bartram, PJ, Meesen, Bell, Buckley, McNamara, Valenti.

Retirees?:

Robertson

McDonald

Whelan

I think the above side shows that "if" we do obtain a Scully at the draft, there will be competition with McLean, Jones & Moloney as they are similar types of players within the midfield. Is there room for all after 2010?

Once the new draftees come in - hopefully two of the first three picks - it will no doubt add to the depth that we crave, and "hopefully" improve the depth of our 'stars' at Melbournefc.

Have a go..

Edited by High Tower

 

Mate, Scully will be one of the first picked. Trengove wouldn't far behind.

I think the above side shows is "if" we do obtain a Scully at the draft, there will be competition with McLean, Jones & Moloney as they are similar types of players within the midfield. Is there room for all?

Once the new draftees come in - hopefully two of the first three picks - it will no doubt add to the depth that we crave, and "hopefully" improve the depth of our 'stars' at Melbournefc.

Have a go..

Im not sure there is.

 
  • Author
Mate, Scully will be one of the first picked. Trengove wouldn't far behind.

I know mate: -

Below is a side I've picked for 2010. It doesn't include 2009 posible draftees (ie Scully, etc).

It's based on the current list.

  • Author
Im not sure there is.

That's what I thought. They're all good servants for the club though, time will tell.


I know mate: -

It's based on the current list.

I'll have to skim better.

At this stage, my starting side for 2010: -

B: Cheney Warnock Rivers

HB: Garland Frawley Bennell

C: Green Sylvia Davey

HF: Bruce Morton Petterd

F: Bate Watts Jurrah

FOLL: Jamar Moloney Grimes

INT: Martin Jones Dunn McLean

Missed: Wonna, Blease, Strauss, Maric, Newton, Miller, Wheatley, Jetta, Bail, Spencer, Bartram, PJ, Meesen, Bell, Buckley, McNamara.

If you can play Garland I'm going to add a few of the others

B: Bennell Warnock Rivers

HB: Garland Frawley Green

C: Blease Grimes Davey

HF: Petterd Butcher Morton

F: Bate Watts Jurrah

FOLL: Meesen Scully Sylvia

INT: Wonaeamirri Jones Maric Strauss Martin Jones Dunn Jetta Moloney Mclean Bruce Jamar McNamara (Remember it's Thursday - extended bench)

Give this side half a season and it'll [censored] your side :lol:

Edited by Roost It

must have Aussie in FP, Bruce is fast becoming an ordinary player

 

AS IT STANDS WITH THE DRAFT SITUATION MY TEAM WOLD BE

B: GARLAND, WARNOCK, BRUCE

HB: DAVEY, FRAWLEY, GRIMES

C: MOLONEY, MCLEAN, MORTON

HF: SYLVIA, BATE, GREEN

F: WATTS, JURRAH, WONAEAMIRRI

FOLL: JAMAR, SCULLY, TRENGROVE

IC: PETTERD, BENNELL, JONES, MARTIN

I recall Stynes making a comment earlier in the season regarding our injury list. The gist of it was that the injuries wouldn't impact us greatly because we were quite even.

You might say this indicates we have good depth, in that we could have a few players out and not particularly miss them as the replacements were around the mark, but when you're bottom of the ladder is that anything to cheer about?

I know that in the ND days people would cite our good depth when blokes like Ferguson, Ward, Brown or Holland were out of the side. Was the fact that the fringe players were as good as some that got games an indication we were a good side?

Sure, it's nice to have people come into the side without your side becoming significantly weaker, but IMO the concept of 'depth' is one that's IMO over-rated.


You might say this indicates we have good depth, in that we could have a few players out and not particularly miss them as the replacements were around the mark, but when you're bottom of the ladder is that anything to cheer about?

Sure, it's nice to have people come into the side without your side becoming significantly weaker, but IMO the concept of 'depth' is one that's IMO over-rated.

I was having this exact discussion earlier in the week. It just shows that there's not a huge difference between the crapness of many of our players. Nothing to boast about really.

It once again shows how important it is to get some stars into the club.

I was having this exact discussion earlier in the week. It just shows that there's not a huge difference between the crapness of many of our players. Nothing to boast about really.

It once again shows how important it is to get some stars into the club.

Absolutely agree regarding stars - we need them badly.

But with the modern game and fast ball movement thru many hands it's also important not to have weak links. You need around 30 capable players. I see even Carlton isn't playing CJ (injured but just not good enough), Bentley or Wiggins.

From next year as Maric, Blease, Strauss and early picks from this year force their way into the team we're going to have players like Jones, Petterd, Wonna, Jetta, McKenzie and Spencer on the fringe of the best 22.

we need a higher order of depth...with stars on top !!

AS IT STANDS WITH THE DRAFT SITUATION MY TEAM WOLD BE

B: GARLAND, WARNOCK, BRUCE

HB: DAVEY, FRAWLEY, GRIMES

C: MOLONEY, MCLEAN, MORTON

HF: SYLVIA, BATE, GREEN

F: WATTS, JURRAH, WONAEAMIRRI

FOLL: JAMAR, SCULLY, TRENGROVE

IC: PETTERD, BENNELL, JONES, MARTIN

What the?

You can't just have two new players like Scully and Trengove in the midfield. They will be worked into it slowly. You would have a Scully or trengove on the wing to ease them in and keep Moloney's hard body in the center.

The other element of this besides new players like Scully is that we have so many young players with so much potential "upside". Thoiugh it's ridiculous to expect that they'll all fulfill this potential, it's very likely that a few of them will. And it's impossible to tell who will make the big leap. I didn't expect Petterd to be able to do so well as he has in the past few weeks, he's definitely added something to the team performance and gone from a fringe player to a mid-level player and may well do even better. Blease & Strauss are two with immense upside that we haven't really seen yet (hard to tell how much Strauss's shoulder affected his play in VFL earlier this year, only time will tell). If someone like Bennell or McKenzie (or Martin or Jetta or ...) puts a lot of work in over the summer & plays up to their potential in the preseason, we'll be writing them into our best teams for round 1. Should be very interesting times ahead.


We have a lot of players that are at the same stage of development, the really good thing about that is that there'll be a lot of competition for spots next year. If Meesen is able to capture his form before his injury in the pre-season he and Jamar will be our ruckmen of choice. The big thing is next year Strauss and Blease will be pushing for selection, and Wonna will be back from his injury riddled second year.

  • Author
If you can play Garland I'm going to add a few of the others

B: Bennell Warnock Rivers

HB: Garland Frawley Green

C: Blease Grimes Davey

HF: Petterd Butcher Morton

F: Bate Watts Jurrah

FOLL: Meesen Scully Sylvia

INT: Wonaeamirri Jones Maric Strauss Martin Jones Dunn Jetta Moloney Mclean Bruce Jamar McNamara (Remember it's Thursday - extended bench)

Give this side half a season and it'll [censored] your side :lol:

:lol:

My opening post you will note that the side was picked without Scully, Butcher, etc (WITHOUT DRAFTEES); because it's not certain as yet.

A good side nevertheless. Do you rate Meesen over Jamar?

At this stage, my starting side for 2010: -

B: Cheney Warnock Rivers

HB: Garland Frawley Bennell

C: Green Sylvia Davey

HF: Bruce Morton Petterd

F: Bate Watts Jurrah

FOLL: Jamar Moloney Grimes

INT: Martin Jones Dunn McLean

Missed: Wonna, Blease, Strauss, Maric, Newton, Miller, Wheatley, Jetta, Bail, Spencer, Bartram, PJ, Meesen, Bell, Buckley, McNamara, Valenti.

Retirees?:

Robertson

McDonald

Whelan

Have a go..

Maybe add Wheatley to the retirees.

FB: Bartram Warnock Frawley

HB: Bennell Garland Rivers

C: Morton Jones Green

HF: Petter Bate Watts

FF: Jurrah Martin Wona

FOLL: Jamar Grimes Moloney

INT: (from) Bruce, Maric, McLean, Buckley, Cheney, Dunn, Jetta

If you can play Garland I'm going to add a few of the others

B: Bennell Warnock Rivers

HB: Garland Frawley Green

C: Blease Grimes Davey

HF: Petterd Butcher Morton

F: Bate Watts Jurrah

FOLL: Meesen Scully Sylvia

INT: Wonaeamirri Jones Maric Strauss Martin Jones Dunn Jetta Moloney Mclean Bruce Jamar McNamara (Remember it's Thursday - extended bench)

Give this side half a season and it'll [censored] your side :lol:

Goooooood side!!!! But how likely is Butcher, if we drafted him, to come straight into the team? He'd take time i would have thought

Maybe add Wheatley to the retirees.

FB: Bartram Warnock Frawley

HB: Bennell Garland Rivers

C: Morton Jones Green

HF: Petter Bate Watts

FF: Jurrah Martin Wona

FOLL: Jamar Grimes Moloney

INT: (from) Bruce, Maric, McLean, Buckley, Cheney, Dunn, Jetta

Goooooood side!!!! But how likely is Butcher, if we drafted him, to come straight into the team? He'd take time i would have thought

Nah, he'll play straight away and dominate just like Jack Wa... oh.


What the?

You can't just have two new players like Scully and Trengove in the midfield. They will be worked into it slowly. You would have a Scully or trengove on the wing to ease them in and keep Moloney's hard body in the center.

Scully is a gun so I don't see why he can't start in the middle and Trengrove is already well built. You know what you get with Moloney I would rather see what our gun recruits will do in the middle(if we get them). With rotations the way they are I don't see why it is a What the? How could you do that? situation.

I was having this exact discussion earlier in the week. It just shows that there's not a huge difference between the crapness of many of our players. Nothing to boast about really.

It once again shows how important it is to get some stars into the club.

Agree. This club will go nowhere, regardless of how good the 22nd best player is, until some stars are born. That is why this draft is so important.

Mate, Scully will be one of the first picked. Trengove wouldn't far behind.

I'm not so sure about that. I'm as certain as you are that Scully will be a star, but in his first year? He is very small. I dunno, maybe you're right.

 
with the modern game and fast ball movement thru many hands it's also important not to have weak links. You need around 30 capable players. I see even Carlton isn't playing CJ (injured but just not good enough), Bentley or Wiggins.

From next year as Maric, Blease, Strauss and early picks from this year force their way into the team we're going to have players like Jones, Petterd, Wonna, Jetta, McKenzie and Spencer on the fringe of the best 22.

Yes, the skill of kicking has never been more important.

Absolutely agree regarding stars - we need them badly.

But with the modern game and fast ball movement thru many hands it's also important not to have weak links. You need around 30 capable players. I see even Carlton isn't playing CJ (injured but just not good enough), Bentley or Wiggins.

From next year as Maric, Blease, Strauss and early picks from this year force their way into the team we're going to have players like Jones, Petterd, Wonna, Jetta, McKenzie and Spencer on the fringe of the best 22.

Petterd and Wonaeamirri are firmly in the club's sights as starting 18 players


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Haha
    • 253 replies