Spirit of '87

Yes should definitely be some “learnings” for him there…

fify = fixed it for you

The Francophile in me says that Parfitt could be parfait

Yes, but what does Karen think?

Yes there were plenty of excuses “um, you probably saw all the masks and stuff, which was probably a bit of a giveaway, we had a couple of guys with Covid, off field people, we had…Max had a bit of gastro, there was a little bit of that, but again, please don’t report that as an insurmountable issue for us this week, it was just one of those things that everyone has to manage at some stage…”!!

But kicked the winning goal

It was Maynard, so it was deemed a “football action” 😬

And roaring and cheering Maynard in support, to drown out the Melbourne boos, every time he ran to or from the interchange throughout the rest of the game.

Couldn’t care less is correct, as it’s suggesting that it’s not possible for you to care any less than you already do, which is what people are trying to say with that term. Could care less suggests that you do still care somewhat and that it’s possible that you could in fact care less than you already do. But who cares I guess 😂

+ van Rooyen = 14.0

For Freo death riders, if Richmond win tonight they’ll jump above Fremantle on the ladder. Just saying…😬

I didn’t get it either, but it’s explained here: https://campaignbrief.com/telstra-launches-new-national-brand-campaign-more-reliable-than-family-via-the-monkeys/

Same sort of reasoning, I would think - they assume that they’ll largely fill their stadium, no matter who they play, including Melbourne, whereas a home game at the MCG against those teams might only draw 20,000. Not saying that I agree with that thinking at all, but it’s perhaps along those lines.