Diamond_Jim

The electorate of Casey is relatively safe LNP but it has little to do with Casey Fields. It centres more around Belgrave and the Yarra Valley. Pakenham was in the federal district of Mc Millan which has now changed to Monash ( first vote in 2019) but I think only part of Pakenham is now in that electorate. PS.. seems that Pakenham is now in Latrobe... projected LNP margin of 3.5% https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal-redistribution-2018/vic/

worked for a large American corporation. I asked one of the high ups in the States one day... why don't you have an office in Washington DC. Answer... no Senators in DC

you may joke OD but I am sure the number crunchers at Essendon, Collingwood and Richmond salivate at owning a stadium between them. It's amazing how the MCG has been able to dictate terms to the AFL and the clubs over the years.

And just to rub it in.. taxpayer funds funded around 75% of the cost of the upgrade to Kardinia Park

As we take the trip down to Kardinia Park this weekend it is worthwhile remembering that sucker clubs such as ourselves actually benefit the Cats by a lot more per crowd member than the likes of Collingwood and Richmond. This is a quote from Brian Cook in 2009 which probably holds doubly true nearly ten years later: Originally Posted by Brian Cook ...at Skilled Stadium when you have a capacity of 25,000, we make a net profit in that game of $638,000 per game, which is $26 per head. If we have a crowd of 85,500 at the MCG, which we did have against Collingwood in 2007, we brought home $771,000, which was $9 a head. Importantly,Telstra, now Etihad Stadium, with a near capacity of 46,000, we brought home $293,000, which is $6 a head. So when you compare a crowd at Skilled of 25,000 compared to Telstra, which is nearly twice as much at 46, you at Skilled bring home to the club $638,000 out of all revenue sources per game and only $293,000 from Telstra. Source Bigfooty thread; https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/stadium-deals-what-how-when-why-we-need-a-new-one-and-the-sa-footy-paradigm-shift-happening.554729/

? was waiting for the first pun.... too easy though

Out of interest why does Stretch play mainly as an inside mid at Casey but then plays an outside role in the AFL? Or am I wrong... which is quite possible ?

that's what worries me too. Other than two or three bursts we were almost goalless if not almost scoreless for the match

would like to see the stats but I suspect you are on the money. Time to give Stretch a decent run of games and let Jack rest/get back his mojo at Casey. Why is this year bringing back memories of the up and down years under Daniher.

Viney was less than stellar yet his form in the Casey practice match was top class. Was there an injury or was it just a step up too soon.

Freo competitive could hurt WCE's top 2 chances. WCE would have banked both games into their calculations

Have a look at this article... not sure how Gaff played https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/western-bulldogs-forward-jack-redpath-has-suspension-extended-for-playing-in-vfl-practice-match-illegally/news-story/8a97fe9164de8dc7a35792e00526dfab PS this is the answer: Redpath was allowed to play in the JLT Community Series and AFLX, but not in a VFL practice match.

Doubt that anyone would seriously suggest Keilty in place of Weid at present. Keilty was used on several occasions as a swing player and has kicked a few clutch goals. If he can do a serviceable job in the ruck he is probably a better choice at present than Preuss if you want to play another tall. Weid is the future no doubt ... he deserves a run of at least 6 games before any calls are made. His replacement if necessary would be one of the Smiths.

Do Casey have another practice match scheduled for next week? thanks

Thanks Drunk'n I think at present Keilty offers more than Preuss even if it as an off the bench role giving Max and the two key forwards a rest. The problem with that approach is what does playing the extra tall do to your midfield rotations. I definitely think Keilty should have played against Port with their dual big man approach. Not sure it's needed against Geelong but perhaps time to try a new strategy for the medium term. For Preuss to be considered he needs to start impacting around the ground and up forward. As I've mentioned a few times the forecast for next week's game is 16 degrees and windy so might not be a night for the talls.

Thought GWS might struggle a little this year after losing some good players but they are doing okay against the Bombers. 42-17 half way through second quarter

nor are the Suns except (I hope) to Tasmania

Good discussion point Wrecker. Out of interest is the secondary bounce still subject to the 6-6-6 rule. If not it seems tome that a tactic that can be used is that Gawn takes the ball out of the ruck and then handballs to a running player... good result. If he gets tackled there is a secondary bounce for which we run a player or two in off half back

In another thread about players who needed/would be likely to improve this year I mentioned the coaching staff. Yesterday was not their finest hour. Preuss playing today at Casey was a major mistake. If not Preuss it should have been Keilty the moment Ryder was declared fit to play. The lack of scoring ability (almost 60 minutes of football with a couple of points scored) showed no plan B and one can go on. Not despairing yet but if we end up 0-3 the chance of a top 4 spot is almost gone. Top 4 is likely to require 16 wins and top two 17-18 plus percentage.

not bad at all exceeded the GWS crowd for round 23 by 1k

why...Geelong only play one ruck and the predicted max is 16 with strong winds. Preuss would be a liability

Must agree the comments about being underdone due to a shorter pre season are also a little hard to take. The finals provided match practice of the best kind. We just took our break at a different time. Hawks et al seem to mange it with no issues

Disappointing if so. He's made for a16 degree game at Kardinia Park KK could be an inclusion if he gets through the Casey practice game

let's be honest...there's not much at Casey. Lewis and May back raise the question of who goes out. Could Keilty get a game in place of Hoare? Forecast for next Saturday is a maximum of 16....much better for us I hope !! Preuss should have been played today if he was any good. Geelong are light on in the ruck department so Gawn should be sufficient.

sarcasm noted but it highlights a serious issue that bears further discussion during the week