The heart beats true

Richmond’s recruitment team are basically going to have to meet 25 players before the draft. It’ll be an absolute mountain of work to run every possible scenario, which they’ll need to do as they have so many picks at the really pointy end. I actually feel sorry for their recruitment staff after losing one of their own this week, and then coming into a once in a lifetime tsunami of work.

I reckon Richmond will be next level awful in ‘25. They’ll be uncompetitive in 70% of their games.

I don’t think his tank suits our game style.

I second those saying that things have got particularly unpleasant on here the last few months. There are a couple of posters with a pathological desire to always be ‘right’. It shows such a complete disregard for almost everyone else who uses this site when they chase each other across threads arguing the same points, or take an opposing view because someone had the audacity to challenge their opinion at one point. And if those users think we don’t see the baiting that goes on most of us do, and it’s boring and immature. I read a fascinating statistic about social media (of which Demonland is part of) this week. 90% of content is posted by less than 20% of users. Which means somewhere in the vicinity of 70% of opinion goes unheard, and most likely fills the middle ground. Essentially what I’m saying is if you’ve made your point trust that it’s been read, and move on and leave some space for other ideas. I love this place and value it enormously, but I wish it was more fun, more conversational, and we could all be less rigid.

Salzburg is a very interesting and picturesque place. It’s not that warm this time of year though, so unlike Christian I do recommend taking a shirt.

Whether it takes Saty! 👍

For those of you who get annoyed by posters on here, but still want to contribute, I developed a coping mechanism a few years back that helps keep it all fun. I imagine certain posters as fictional characters. One is George Costanza, another is Eeyore from the Winnie the Pooh books, and another is Dwight from the Office. Then when I read their posts it makes me laugh, and helps me remember they are just people. Whatever you need to do to stick around I reckon. This place needs all the opinions, but it’s the most fun when nobody takes it too seriously.

I legitimately think Clayton is just trolling the world now, and it’s hilarious.

I think it’s a very interesting argument either way in regards to who orchestrates the review. If reviewed externally you’re much more likely to get a warts and all disclosure of where the problems lie. Sounds good right? But what if the review says things that supporters have made it very obvious they don’t want to hear? What then? I suspect this is a part of the decision making, which is not to say I support any dog in the fight. It’s just to say that supporters have made their opinions very well known over the last few months, and it may actually be limiting the clubs options in regards to outcome.

Hopefully the G suits his game style.

I would like it to be publicly known that I have never taken any money to voice my opinions here on Demonland, but I would be VERY willing to be anyone’s mouthpiece for the right price.

That holding the ball was a square up for the 50 they missed.

Harley Reid turned 19 and really let himself go.

I’m now firmly of the opinion that the AFL is trying to make it really obvious to clubs that the compensation for teams that finish lower will be really strong. I think they are trying to have clubs be more open to Free Agency, and to structure contracts as such. Why sign a player who’s good but not great beyond their FA year, if you can be rewarded with a top 10 pick for them? I think the AFL has been disappointed with the impact of FA, and this is their way of making it more palatable for everyone.

In shocking news, every club thinks every player is worth a first round pick.

This from Tim Lamb in The Age says a lot. Looks like a massive own goal: With Dan Houston [changing his mind], is there a concern these instances are causing other players to have concerns about coming to your club? Yeah, obviously, when stuff’s in the media, if you’re a player, if you’ve got choice, and there’s noise around a club, which there was [around us] at that time, then obviously, that could have an impact. But in terms of Dan specifically, I can’t answer that. But yeah, that’s a fair point you’re asking. Is that something you need to address internally and clear up for the future, to make sure the players do want to come to your club? 100 per cent. We don’t want to be a club that players don’t want to come to. We want to be a really attractive place for players to come to. Are you attractive at the moment? (Long pause) That’s a good question. Hard to answer. Yeah, it’s hard to answer. Is it concerning that you have to pause and think about it? I’m just trying to give a measured answer.

Noble is wildly over valued in my opinion. I don’t think his skillset is particularly difficult to find.

I just think the system is currently interesting for clubs. I’ve always felt like historically clubs have offered contracts to avoid FA taking someone away. If the compensation is going to be considerably better than what someone would get in a trade it might swing back the other way a bit, and make FA more attractive to everyone to explore. Might be the reasoning behind the consistent overs on compensation. You never want to lose your top 5 players to FA, but perhaps after that it becomes more attractive.

ANB for 28 is an absolute steal if Battle if worth pick 8. Both finished 3rd in their respective BnF’s. The only difference is one of them has a contract - and somehow he’s the one less valuable. Something wrong with the system if that’s the case.

My partner refers to the clubs shenanigans as ‘The Real Housewives of Casey’.

St Kilda are a dog of a club. Forcing Battle not to come to the BnF, and then making out like bandits with a top 10 pick for him. It's such a 1970's 'us against the world' mentality. No modern player would want to go there now. They've revealed themselves to be petty and small minded.

I love the way you spell ‘Carrryst’ PF. It really helps me get in character when I read out your posts in my head.

Imagine if this whole thing has just been an elaborate promotional campaign to sell BnF tickets?

I don’t think discussing a players personal neurological diagnosis is constructive. Nobody but them can know how it impacts their life.

Clayton’s been a distraction for years, and his last 2 seasons haven’t been worthy of his contract. The club can wear some responsibility for the scale of the contract, but I’m of the opinion 80% of the responsibility for this sits with the individual. Oliver still doesn’t seem to understand the expectations of the club (as witnessed at the Brownlow). He's been in the system for 9 years. He should get it by now. This might be the circuit breaker the playing group needs. It lets the other players see the club won’t let anyone stand in the way of team success. I hate that it’s played out how it has, but if Clayton left last season and we had watched him play this season for someone else like he played for us we would be thinking we dodged a massive bullet. Maybe this is the right call?