rjay

Nothing much has changed since last Friday...delusional is a good word 'Febes'...

Sydney.... A bit like Buddy it was always Sydney not GWS. Freo are the new GWS, Hogan is bound for Sydney. ...there you go 'sue', that should get the 300 easily.

I reckon Roosy would have given the inside mail to Dew...he is a Dom fan. The terms would want to be very good for him to make the move though.

Well you aren't correct, there are other clubs interested and one would surprise.

You are underselling him, at his best he would be way ahead of Smith. However... @Pennant St Dee I'm interested in your reply on this thread. I think I know what it will be but maybe there has been a big revelation and he is a changed man. If so hard to see why Freo would dump him now...

There were a couple of well known "rousers of rabble" on the site for a while...I guess some are pointing to a similar posting style. Does it really matter? Probably not...

I don't think we will be chasing Kelly...let someone else pay way overs for him. We have a couple of our own we will need to secure in the next couple of seasons.

He has some solid interest in Melbourne so unless the GC are going to give him an exceptional deal he won't be headed there. Players still have control of where they go under present AFL rules and as much as we may like to package a deal Dom still has the final say.

I know that he has had some interest whether anything comes to pass is yet to be seen. As for your insiders/outsiders point I'm not so sure they agree with that in clubland. Despite what is said by many on here Dom can play and will easily find a home.

I wouldn't bet on it... It might be option 3, other clubs expressing interest. i think it's bit of all 3...

Petty is a different type of player, intercept mark, zone off and still very immature in a football sense. Keilty is nowhere near the class off May and I think even his brother would agree with this. They would not be even close to playing a similar role to May.

He has interest from Victorian clubs so I would think if the trade & deal is right he will be on the move. He is a good player, it's just our list has similar types and the FD are backing others ahead of him. Will be a good addition at a club that he suits (clubs with plenty of outside run to cover) as he was for us when he first came on board.

Good luck trying to get a fair deal from the clown Josh...

I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned Ryan O'Keefe. Wanted to leave Sydney, was out the door but they couldn't agree on a trade, ended up staying and went on to win the Norm & a Premiership. Not everything is black & white...but we do hold the cards.

As Roos said a few weeks back the media and football industry in general can be like sheep...the whole thing gains momentum and they just tag on and then we get this almost hysteria about it (whatever the issue is)... Think the Carlton priority pick scenario as a recent example. The media built it up from maybe to a roar that they must apply and would be certain to bet a priority pick they would be mad not to apply. The AFL commission knocked it down...for good reason. ...and it all died down.

They will have the Gaff money...so I would expect salary cap may not be an issue.

I think he has the upside of someone like Yeo... A pretty convincing reason to buy.

Yep, I think we're on the same track. I just wouldn't put him with the others on the list. I think he has some good exposed form, the others really didn't. They were more spec picks... The spec here is whether he can get over the previous injuries. I'm excited about him as a prospect, I was trying to think who we could bring in without going down the big fish path. There had to be someone out there that would be a perfect fit for us and I think the FD uncovered him.

I wouldn't put KK in either of these categories. He's a much better player than all listed. He has played quality footy but injury has been an issue, in the first list none of those had proven form apart from the odd game for a couple of them. He's certainly nothing like Watts and that acquisition. Jack got nowhere near top 2 in our b&f good or bad years. The bet with KK is nothing to do with form and more to do with getting him injury free and confident in his body.

I don't think he fits our needs 'Mad'. He doesn't have one thing that really stands out about him and we have some like JKH & Billy for example on the list already. Looked good during the year but seemed to fall off in the finals which is not a good advertisement.

I don't know that many are writing Hunt off but he is an entirely different player to Gaff. Apart from his at times haphazard ball use Hunt doesn't get a lot of it, he doesn't naturally find the ball and that's probably Gaff's biggest asset (along with the tank to get the job done). Hunt can be a line breaker and at his best also uses his pace to put a lot of pressure on the opposition. He had a manic attack that was missing this year. Get that back & he's on his way.

The bidding will go a lot higher on Shiel... ...by the time this trade period is up he will be up around the $1mill which is way overs for his output.

Hogan is gone. Seems it was going to happen at some stage. As for the what our priorities are, KD is one. Frost is not the long term answer and Oscar is limited. Looking to fix this weakness doesn't mean we aren't looking to fix others. ...and May might not even want to come to us or GC might want too much. We might have other irons in the fire that no one knows about yet. Some results papered over our weak defence, others showed it up. It is a real problem area and most of our fans are on the edge of their seats when the ball goes into to our defensive 50...

Go back and have a look at the WC prelim and you might work it out...

You would be one of very few 'deanox'. To me it's a huge problem, if we can get it sorted and add a bit of silk we are set.