Jump to content

poita

Members
  • Posts

    2,777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by poita

  1. I can't wait to experience (endure?) the excitement of somebody trading pick 43 and 27 for pick 21 over the coming weeks. I really hope we just take our two picks this year and preserve our strong hand for next year.
  2. Bassat sounds like a tool of the highest order. Ditto Lethlean. “I also want to address the issue of the extension of the contract. “We gave Brett assurance at the start of 2022 that we would give him clarity mid-year. “At the time, the team was winning games and in contention, and we wanted to give Brett all the support he needed to give him the best chance of success and to show that he could be our long-term coach. “If we as a Club have regrets about that in hindsight, we cannot let those regrets get in the way of making the right decision for the future. “The Football Review has affirmed that while we have made improvements, there is still a big gap between where we are and where we want to be, and that we have a lot more work to do right across the Club to create a culture that drives sustainable success. “We do not yet have the winning culture or ruthless commitment to football excellence that we need. “Our Club is hungry for success, and we believe a different type of leader and a new voice is needed to take us on the next stage of the journey.
  3. Pearce is a massive out. She and Harris are the two players we can't replace. Perhaps Zanker can do some more rucking, and what she lacks in hit outs will hopefully be offset by her work at ground level. Hopefully we can take enough chances to keep the game reasonably stress free in the second half. Ultimately we just need to keep winning to lock in a couple of finals at Casey Fields.
  4. Totally agree with this. We need to make the best of our two picks this year, without trying to be clever, and then go super hard in next year's draft. Our list will be starting to look pretty old by next year, so it is the perfect time to freshen up with a bunch of high draft picks.
  5. To be honest I'd rather have kept Mitch Brown on a fraction of the salary.
  6. O'Meara has been overpaid and has underperformed for his entire career. If Hawthorn want to free up some salary cap room, he is the perfect place to start. I'd be more worried about them offloading Tom Mitchell, who has at least met his end of the bargain in his time at Hawthorn.
  7. Poor decision to keep persisting with him as a permanent forward once Brown came to the club. Should have been tried in defence through 2021/2022 and / or in place of Jackson as a ruck / forward in the back end of 2022. Ultimately that's 3 depth players we have lost for nothing in this period - we desperately need to add some ready made players before round 1.
  8. That Bowes deal is an absolute disgrace. So, why weren't we involved?
  9. I honestly can't see us losing a game next year with Schache in the team.
  10. I'm not sure we never draft from WA again, but it has to be a factor, particularly at the top end of the draft. Jackson wasn't comparable to any other player in the draft, but why would you take a WA midfielder over a Vic midfielder if they are otherwise pretty similar.
  11. I can't believe we played Jackson through the second half of the season when it was clear to Blind Freddy and his dog that he was leaving. He couldn't have been looked less interested in being a Melbourne player through that period, and certainly did nothing to enhance his trade value. I wish him a meaningless career at Fremantle finishing 15th in the B&F each year in a side that goes nowhere.
  12. So in essence we could have traded Bedford for a tenth round pick in the first minute of the trade period and been no worse off? Laughable waste of time and effort.
  13. I'll say it again, I thought the point of entering into trades was to improve our list. The Hunt deal didn't improve our list, the draft pick swap didn't improve our list, any potential deal for Tomlinson won't improve our list and this deal won't improve our list. Why are we trading out handy depth players for crappy draft picks that are being sent to other clubs? Time for Tim Lamb to put on his big boy pants and get some results.
  14. Van Rooyen looks a beauty, but we'll need to be patient. (As an aside, I can't see Petty playing forward when he'll be needed to replace May in the next year or so. I'm not as sold on Turner as others around here. Not big and not quick for the role we want him to play. Doesn't really impose himself in the VFL to date. Laurie and Howes look a long way off to me given their output in the VFL final series. Laurie needs to work harder to get more involved in the game, whilst Howes probably just needs time in the gym and miles in the legs. Hopefully they can both have a big pre season. Chandler has been on the list four years and has shown nothing much to date. You can argue about opportunities, but does he really demand them? He had the chance to come in and impress late against a tiring West Coast and managed to get himself suspended in a 5 minute cameo - that's just plain dumb. Woewodin meets every challenge he is faced with and I think he will push for games next year. Moniz-Wakefield is a very long shot of ever playing AFL, ditto McVee.
  15. I thought Jayden's form for most of the year was pretty solid, and I certainly would have more confidence in him playing a role next year than either Hibberd or Smith. Ultimately I don't really see the point to letting best 22 players walk for the proverbial packet of chips, particularly for the sake of $100K or so. Good luck Jayden, and thanks for your efforts over the past 9 years.
  16. A fourth year player averaging 8 disposals and 1 goal across 8 games - I think he received all of the opportunities that his performances deserved. His speed and goal sense are handy, but overall he doesn't get in the right positions often enough at the highest level. If GWS reckon they can make an AFL player out of him, good luck to them.
  17. I could certainly make a case for Mitch going around again in a similar role on a minimal salary given our lack of key forward depth. He has done everything we could have asked from him in that position and at that stage of his career. That said, I'm not surprised he is moving on after an AFL career spanning 14 years. Well done, Mitch.
  18. The 2020 national draft is not shaping up as being a good one for the club. As much as you hope every kid coming through the door has a long and rewarding career, I didn't see anything to suggest that Rosman had the makings of an AFL player. I'm glad we made the call now rather than dragging it out for another 12 months.
  19. Disappointed he left when we were critically short of talls. Could have battled through and played in a premiership at Casey, or pulled the pin earlier and allowed us to find a replacement. Having recently read his book, I hope he is in a good head space and getting the support he needs.
  20. A major disappointment for most of 2022. A great athlete to be sure, but I'm not sure he's a great footballer. Certainly he struggles with some pretty basic fundamentals, amongst some brilliant bits of play. I can see why Fremantle are keen, without wanting to sell the farm for him. I don't think he'll ever be a key forward, and he is undersized as a ruckman. Can he get fit enough and win enough of the ball to play the midfield role Freo want him for? I'm pretty happy to bank two first round picks and move on.
  21. I can't believe people are (a) surprised and (b) complaining about getting two first round picks for Jackson. We have no bargaining power in this deal, and even less so if North commit to using PSD pick 1. Would people prefer Jackson walks to West Coast in the PSD? The Lever deal is absolutely comparable and the Fremantle offer is slightly better than what we gave Adelaide. I'd be taking the two picks today and moving on to other things.
  22. I wouldn't give Lachie Hunter $6 to play football for my team, let alone $600K. Hard pass.
  23. I'd really love to know if we put any work into Wright, because he has been an absolute steal by Essendon.
  24. I thought that the point of trading players was that you improve your list. Letting Hunt walk for pick 52 (a pick we may not use) is a clear step backwards. Getting rid of Harmes for anything other than a top 10 player would be an even bigger step backwards, and even then I would be reluctant given his versatility and cultural importance. If the reason for doing so is to bring in damaged goods such Hunter, then this becomes even more questionable. We have had a good reputation for respecting contracts and looking after players in recent times. Even the faintest hint to a player such as Harmes that he should consider his options whilst under contract is really disappointing. If nothing else, I would hate to be relying on Sparrow or Jordon to step up if we get injuries to one of the big 3 in the midfield.
  25. I can think of at least ten players I'd move on before Hunt, including both Smiths, McVee, and Hibberd in similar roles. Disappointing decision by the club not to look after him.
×
×
  • Create New...