binman

Another big difference is that in all three losses we have key injuries during games. And In each case it included key defenders. Our defensive structures have fallen apart and we haven’t been able to stop intercept marks down back This game was insane. At one point, Turner, petty and gawn all came off injured within a few minutes.

To he honest, my biggest concern is injury We had a blessed run last season. I'd be guessing, but I doubt we lost more than 25 odd games (40 if you include tomo) to injury of our best 22. If you include covid protocols and flu we'd be close to 30 best 22 already. To make matters worse, plenty of players seem to be carrying something and Max gets smashed every game. We need a good run with injury from here.

That makes no sense at all. But, whatever. As I have posted before, time won't tell for you because your mind is made up. I think we will win seven more home and away games. And win all three finals we play in, including of course, a back to back flag. And just like last year, I'll wait to the odds stop drifting (I backed us straight after our loss to the dogs in round 19) and I'll load up on us big time to win the flag.

Do you mean like last year? - After the bye we very average in our scrappy 11 point win against the bombers in round 15 - were woeful and couldn't run past our shadow in our loss to the giants in round 16 - as Max said post game, we freshened up for the Port game, and won in round 17 - we were woeful and flat in our draw against the Hawks in round 18 - then got rolled by the dogs in round 19 So, from round 13 to round 19 we went three losses, one draw and two wins. From that point we caught fire and were clearly the fittest side in the competition for the remainder of the season and didn't lose anorher game If you ask me, the 'loading narrative' held up pretty well. But I guess you'd argue the opposite. And perhaps put our remarkable form turn around to magic fairy dust and dumb luck.

Maybe. But i reckon discussing it goes against the footballer's code to never, under any circumstances provide any contextual info that even remotely could be perceived as making an excuse. And becuase ex footballers have always dominated the coverage of the game, that stupid mantra has infected the footy media.

This is the corresponding post game thread from last year. It makes for interesting reading in terms of how similar it is to this thread in terms of trying to explain our terrible form. It is more negative, which is understandable because we hadn't yet played one of the most dominant finals series of all time and won out first flag in 57 years. And it's not the game day thread, so as the thread goes on people have had time to process the loss and are not as out there with their comments. Even so, some of the post are incredibly negative - and woefully wrong as history proved. If you supported another team and came to Demonland mid 2021 to get a handle on how likely it was the dees would win the flag, figuring dees fans would have good read on the situation, if you read the 2021 Queen's post game threadyou would have given the dees no chance of winning a flag.

I don't get this layzie Why is it supposed to be an afterthought, not a hot topic of conversation? Even if, like your good self, you are not convinced about loading, but are not ruling it out, i reckon it SHOULD be a hot topic of conversation. The thing i find bizarre is it's not a topic that is discussed AT ALL by the so called football analysts and media people when trying to work out what is happening at the dees. Instead they cast around for all manner of causes and theories to explain our slump. Just as they did last year, and in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to explain the ultimate premiership winner's mid season form slumps (remarkably similar to ours). I mean, even if you don't buy loading, or think it only has a minor impact, surely the fact the last four premiers' seasons have followed almost the identical pattern (start strong and bank wins, mid season form slump including some truly mystifying losses to crap teams, finishing the season full of running and all having a very similar number of wins) would be worth noting and exploring. It's possible the fact the last four premiers have followed an almost identical pattern on the way to their flag is simply a coincidence . But logic suggests that it is unlikely to be the case. And even if it is, the fact we are mirroring that same pattern this year is worthy of analysis and discussion. Instead they all ignore it all together. After 8 rounds or so David King said 'Be very afraid, Melbourne are going at about 70 per cent of last year, and they’re already proving they’re 50 per cent better than the rest of the competition'. We completely drop off a cliff and go from one of the fittest sides to one that getting overrun in second halves - again, just as we did last season at the same point in time. And David King jumps off us, is all symptoms but can't nail a cause. And doesn't even touch on loading as a potential factor. Bizarre. What i find really curious is why loading it is not discussed - even if only to debunk it - by any of the analysts, ex footballers or commentators. In other words, why isn't it a hot topic of conversation? (I have made this point any number of times, but to be clear, i don't think loading is the only factor contributing to our currently predictable form slump. I do think it is the MAIN factor, but our injuries, the impact of covid and the flu, the form of individual players, other teams developing good plans to negate our strengths etc etc are all factors too)

I said to my mate yesterday that my idea of hell would be attending a big game, like a final, at the G, have cox go off AND the crowd chanting USA, USA- such as occurred in the 2018 preliminary. Cox then started dominating - even kicked a goal on the run from 50! I thought to myself that at least the crowd didn't start chanting. Then walking down the stairs at the back of tbe ponsford a big bunch of pussed young blokes, all pies fans, start chanting 'dees are [censored]', followed up with, you guessed it USA, USA. Jesus wept.

I did, in large because two of my mates who I was sitting wirh were screaming at us to move rhe ball all quarter! I definitely think we were looking to slow rhe game down and hold the pies. But my theory is they did so, not so much to conserve energy for an assault in the last, but to conserve energy full stop. By that I mean, you could see they were gassed. It doesn't actually matter what the cause was, their fatigue could not be more obvious (tracc was totally gassed for instance and had no power at all in terms of bursting from stoppages). And equally you could see that the pies were less fatigued. So I reckon the dees were trying to take the speed completely out of the game as that was the best way to stay in the contest. The pies eventually got control of the tempo and put speed on tbe ball. And, just like freo and the swans, ran over the top of us. Again, leaving aside the cause (because lthe idea of loading seems to be very triggering for some people) it was as clear as day that we simply couldn't go with them.

I wonder if it is the so called "four core' stats that champion data aggregate to create a 'pressure' rating. I can't recall exactly what the four stats are - one is 'without the ball' (which if I understand includes stuff iike defensive running and spread) .I'm not sure if collectively those four things define pressure. They might, but it's interesting because our contested ball and tackle numbers, which are measures to some degree of pressure, are pretty much the same as last year. King and montagna have been banging on about it all season - and mentioned before the freo game that we were number one in the championship data 'core four' in 2021, but were 18th this year. There's a couple of queries I have in regard to that bit of data. The 2021 ranking was post the full season. What was it at the corresponding stage in 2021 (ie at tgis point in the season). That is important contextual because you are not comparing apples and apples otherwise The other query is why there has been such a dramatic drop in that measure (1st to 18th). God bless his cotton socks, robbo asked king and montagna why there had been such a drop, and followed up with 'do you rhibk it is deliberate, or some such. Unsurprisingly, neither had an answer for either question. Go figure. Very interesting questions though, and I an to explore them on tbe podcast tonight. Dies anyone have and theories or hypothetical answers to those two questions?

I'm confused. Do you want nev to facepalm - but only if he is a coward? But if he were to facepalm your bemusing post, given your challenge, wouldn't that be courageous? But if facepalming your post is courageous, then he would not be a coward in doing so.. So then can't facepalm because he is not a coward. Personally, if was nev, o would use the laughing emoji. Because the post, like pretty much every one of your posts, is pure comedy gold. By the by, on the topic of cowardly posting behaviour, I don't recall you posting much, if at all, during our run of 17 straight wins. But, now, with tge cover if 3 losses you suddenly appear with more of your, we are woeful, contributions. So very courageous. Not.

When you say we are 17th in pressure, what metric are you using?

Let the nervus Nellie's and doomsayers come at us. Let the odds drift a bit more from 3.50 you can now get. And load up on us to win the flag.

VR is the real deal. A natural footballer, a natural forward who has great forward craft and as you say plays with aggression. The thing i love most about him hover is how super competitive he is as evidenced by his attack on the ball and his second and third efforts.

Yep you're probably right. Freo looked fatigued to my eye, and so i thought it wss a really meritorious win. They're a good team and have more genuinely fast players than us, which gives them an x factor.

You're kidding aren't you? They were running up and down on the spot in the last and had very little of their outside speed and run all game. Good win. But a touch lucky as the hawks smashed them in terms of inside 50s but wasted their opportunities. And freo made the most of theirs, with some help by some woeful defence.

Not sure about tomorrow- but I doubt they'll be flat on Monday

The lions will be flat too. Get on the saints line of 19 points

Freo looking flat. I wonder why. Well to honest, I dont Glad I backed the hawks at the 39 point line on the theory that freo would be flat.

Exactly. I'm happy for the AFL integrity department to investigate. If any of the players have gold porkies to the club then they deserve their right wack. The problem with picking and choosing which incident they investigate is they open themselves up to accusations of selective investigations and/or having an agenda. And if every incident was investigated the players involved in any incident would be less likely to withhold key information.

Puts May's post game joke when being interviewed on field about Smith getting.in his way or some such in a different light.

Yep. He gets up and down the ground, albeit at not a great pace, which is important in terms of replacing Tmac. He's not super strong, but good one on one and he is an excellent kick for goal. So a better like for like, and better option you'd have to say, than weed.

Yes they do.

I reckon he is like Tom and Oscar

Occam's razor baby