Jump to content

old dee

Annual Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by old dee

  1. In my view no but not sure there will be many who agree.
  2. And the value of good backman?
  3. Not sure the FD agree with you Steve. I reckon they will take one first rounder and something else. That might even be next year. How does that grab you?
  4. You can put the house on that one.
  5. That puts you in a very small group jr. I think the FD are for reasons unknown to us hell bent on him leaving.
  6. old dee replied to Chelly's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    No thank you we have had enough of there cast off's in the last decade to last us a lifetime.
  7. You have my vote, create your own luck go for it Dees!
  8. old dee replied to rjay's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    You have my vote. The union will resist but the players will only have themselves to blame.
  9. Don't know sue but there is something missing in the story. The MFC seems too methodical and calm from day 1. Almost like they started the trade for reasons of their own.
  10. old dee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yes a few years ago we had cornered the market on that one.
  11. I am far from convinced that was the only motivation sue.
  12. Does it come with a knife? If so I bid $20 and the use of my membership for the first G match of 2019
  13. I agree bb and us on the outside don't hold all the knowledge.
  14. There is still plenty of time Dr. Days to go. We all just want a quick result and at this time of the year that seldom happens. Everyone is jockeying for position.
  15. I don't remember any of those people saying don't go Jessie. If they have I stand corrected, can you supply the statements?
  16. Have you considered that Jessie did not initiate this trade and might not be hot on the idea?
  17. The thing that amazes me about a large number of posters on this thread is they seem to think that the MFC have a burning desire to keep young Jessie. From my seat in the outer the FD quite clearly don't. Have any of you out there considered the possibility that the MFC might have initiated this trade?
  18. Perhaps they know something you don't olisik?
  19. old dee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That's it the Cardinals, that's what I was thinking about. Thanks DF.
  20. old dee replied to Chelly's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Spot on SF. There has not been one statement from the club or players saying " please stay Jessie" Does that tell you something. There is a lot more to this than meets the eye. I see a lot of simulatives to the Watts trade last year.
  21. Amazing but unlikely.
  22. old dee replied to Chelly's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    There is zero evidence they want to keep him.
  23. old dee replied to Chelly's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I disagree 100% with your first sentence, it assumes they want to keep him. I have seen no evidence of that.
  24. old dee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    We should be so lucky!
  25. So what time do I get there Stevienic23?