Little Goffy

Yeah, good joke but it has a realism issue - a classroom with Collingwood fans in it.

Wow. Mate, sorry, I'll never be taking anything you say seriously again. Are you drunk?

OH bugger bugger bugger. I still haven't paid my 'Newton Pledge'. I owe $50 to someone, somewhere. If any mods know what I should do, please post or something. How embarrassing.

If we're going with player awards as symbols of recruiter ability, maybe we should look at the Rising Star award... Petterd - 2007 Jones - 2006 & 2007 (was it second or third in 07?) Bartram - 2006 (third place?) Bate - 2006 Mclean - 2005 Sylvia - 2005 Davey - 2004 (runner-up) Rivers - 2004 (WINNER) Green -2000 Bruce - 2000 Whelan - 2000 Based on this list, you'd have to say there was a serious slump from 2001 to 2003, but the form has been good since the sensational double of Rivers/Davey winner/runner-up in 2004. Meanwhile, how many of these players had poor years in 2007? Half of them were missing through injury for almost the whole year.

Essendon, Carlton, Richmond, St Kilda. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! They're gonna be cracking me up for years. I will say this, as much as ditching Daniher was ugly, at least it was done with a plan in mind and a professional outlook.

I guess that makes Robert Walls 'solid evidence' that there is no place for men in football. Pull your finger out.

Surely it'll come out in Mark Williams' speech after the grand final, he has to make one, win or lose, might as well throw that in...

I'd be stoked to pick Goose put in the PSD, but couldn't be stuffed trading for him. My big trade predictions for the Demons - Pick 4 & 21 plus Colin Syvlia to West Coast for Chris Judd and pick 32. Pick 37 and Jamar to Hawks for pick 30. Pick 29 and Miller to Carlton for pick 20. That leaves one more trade, a big name player so we can get back an early draft pick. Robertson-Bulldogs and Johnstone-Fremantle are all that have been talked about so far. One of those and pick 32 should get us a top ten? If we trade Jamar obviously it becomes crucial that we take a decent ruckman in the draft, even if he only plays four games this year. Unless we're banking that Holland will provide depth for FF, FB and ruck at the same time!! Anyway, Ben McEvoy, COME ON DOWN! That would be one of... six, seven, draft picks, most of which would be around the 60+ pick (So you know, Bruce, Hird, that sort of player) even after you allow for Bode. My draft preferences still lean towards Rance & McEvoy, come what may.

I think we have been a bit soft on the kids. Or maybe a bit, hmmm, not lazy, laissez faire? Pathetically, I'll refer to Baileys's comment about 'not putting barriers in front of them'. Telling a kid that he's basically going to spend a season 'learning the game' at Sandringham kind of puts it beyond their power to reach further. Personally it annoys me when people just stop walking when they get on an escalator or one of those flat ones they have at airports, but it's the same with kids who get told they're on a program. Don't get me started on the fricking year 7,8,9,10,11,12,cliff... conveyor belt in the education system! All the great players have had a voracious appetite for learning and improving throughout their career, and that has been undermined at Melbourne by what I think was an assumption of improvement over time. 'Give him a year and he'll be much better'. Bah. Give him a lesson, let's make him better. Give him a goal, he'll make himself much better.

I only have minor issues with Harris at the moment, and while I like confidence on him I don't have an actual problem with Bohdan. It does concern me that there were quite so many people in the room at once - and these two were surplus to that discussion if you ask me.

One reason we're in with a better chance than any other team - Our banner can authentically say - "WELCOME HOME"

Co-captains anyone? Green/Bruce? McDonald/Mclean? Neitz/Judd? Mclean/Judd? (Drooooool...)

Y_M, one in three of your posts work perfectly for me, and this was one of them. Now I have to brace for the next two...

It's hard to play youth when even the back-up players are getting cleaned out by injury! Still, our list 'under 24' is brilliant if you ask me. We've just delisted Bizzell, Brown Ward, Pickett and Godfrey, with an average age just shy of 30. More significantly, all of these five players have successors in our young players, and won't be badly missed on the field (I'm prepared to shed a tear for them away from th 'G). I'd hesitate to put a line under Bode and Buckley just yet, though I like them. 88 - Bartram, Frawley, Garland, Jones, Petterd 87 - Bate, Buckley, Dunn, Newton, Bode 86 - C. Johnson, Mclean 85 - Bell, Sylvia 84 - P. Johnson, Moloney, Rivers 83 - Davey, Jamar, Miller Seven players in those minimum age levels who you'd be pretty sure of an AFL career for. It's interesting that it gets a little sparse from there, just one or two a year going back to 24 year olds. But it's these last couple of years of drafting that have changed the tone. You have to go back to our own little superdraft ('99) before you see anything better. And you can really see that in the shape of our team now.

Is it just me or is West Coast actively trying to make Judd look like a selfish brat? That offer of 'he can live in Melbourne and still play for us must be a joke - it's after the horse has bolted, totally impactical, and if they were serious about the offer then the last place they'd make it is in the media. There's been a couple of little things like that which have me thinking WC aren't going to let this all happen smoothly. I wonder if there will be some kind of, what was itcalled , the 'Veale deal' which prevented another trade going through so a star went into the pere-season draft?

On the plus side, Adelaide might be looking for a replacement, relatively young ruckman. Perhaps a big-bodied fella who hasn't quite learnt to contribute around the ground but has routinely shown potential, possibly really benefiting from a change of club?

I think the club needs to go for a "Quality over Quantity" strategy with the merchandise. I'd like to see something really special - a step up. You know, like those double-image 'hologram' cards/fridge magnets, with kind of an action sequence - Something like Rivers going back for one of those priceless defensive marks - first shot total focus on ball, second shot massive pack all crunching around him. A two-frame shot of that Juice mark might work well - one on the ground, one not so much Come on, I know I'm not creative, what are other peoples suggestions for GOOD merchandise. Good being - Memorable Sharable Durable

Robbo averaged three goals a game to kick those 40-50 goals this year (and be our leading goalkicker by what, 20 goals?). Assessing realistically - With an interrupted season, carrying injury and in a collapsing team, 40-50 goals. With an imporved injury situation, we could bank on 50+ goals. With other forwards injury free, it increases his freedom. With a midfield actually delivering, another step up. Best realistic scenario for Robbo is to put in another 70 goal season or two before he retires. Worst realistic case is 40 goal / 15 game years, which continue to include a few game-breakers each season. So we're looking at a player with a bad season returning 40+ goals, and a good season bring in 70. And while we all get annoyed about his habit of doing a cartwheel belly-flop several times a game, there's no denying that he is a genuine matchwinner. Even a couple of this year's wins hinged on Robbo up forward. And he's really not that old. I'd honestly give him the three year contract because I think his commitment to the club is such that he would retire gracefully if he just couldn't contribute anymore. Keep.

I am only basing my speculation on what I've seen written, here and other random places. The starting post of this thread describes Sloane as pacey with good kicking skills, and good at clearances. Also says he has lifted since a teamate got injured. Playing for Eastern Rangers, I wonder if he ever gets called the Sloane Ranger? A couple of people have described players on my preferred/realistic list as being higher draft picks than the starting post here has them. I'd also heard McEvoy was a likely first rounder. I'm hoping that our trade strategy will be to improve our second pick from 20ish to 12ish, by trading the current pick plus a relatively low-value player (Jamar would be the main example) for the higher pick. Securing the two big guys is first priority, the three remaining preferences I've got are tipped at 20th-60th, 30th-60th and 50+ draft picks, obviously no real predictions can be made about who of them would be available that late, so I'll let CAC handle the rest now that I've sorted out the top order

Alex Rance-194cm, 87kg-Swan Districts. ( CHB/FB). Top 15 pick. Ben McEvoy-199cm, 90kg-Murray Bushrangers. (Ruck, fwd) Pick 10 to 30 Addam Maric-179cm, 80kg-Calder Cannons. Pick 20 to 60 Jay Bowden-184cm, 74kg-Glenorchy TAS Pick 30 to 60 Rory Sloane-180cm, 75kg-Eastern Rangers. Pick 50 plus Based only on what has been said about them in the blurbs here, and where they are predicted to go, this is a vague picture of what I'd want to see. Switch Ebert for Rance if you like, though something just sat right with me about Rance's write-up. My top priority is to minimise turnovers from poor skills, and to get us some extra pace. I think it's a disaster for team morale and confidence to have so many turnovers, and with the number of young players we'll be playing next year and 09, confidence will be particularly important. Meanwhile, the quest for a star Key Defender is eternal. Every one of these selection had comments about 'good kicking skills', 'good decisions', 'hits targets by foot'. Most have 'good pace'. Assuming five picks (plus Bode elevation) I'd by very happy with this collection. Meanwhile- Dave Gourdis-193cm, 88kg-Subiaco. (CHF) Impressed for WA at CHF during the champs. Good sized kid who was very mobile and a good shot at gaol. If he's headed for gaol, I'd assume Collingwood or a WA club will pick him up...

Jones McDonald Green Bell White ...and after that it gets very hard. That's pretty much all of our list that has played more than 18 games this year. 'Shame on you' to everyone who excluded Bell.

I thought the Sydney song started something like - "We are all fair-weather fans, losing a game will empty the stands..." and ended with - "switch back to the rugby league the Swannies are history!" But I might be mistaken. Anyway, my tip is that the Collingwood/Sydney game will end up a lot like the Melbourne/Freo final last year. Hate to bring back memories, but at least we'll know that the Pies fans are really suffering, which is a bonus. The best part is, even if Collingwood win this week, even if they win again next week, at some point, inexorably, unstoppably, their unshakable fate is to fall short. Again.

This is fantastic, really good team being put together here. I think it's worth taking a moment to reflect that the reason very few of us were keen on Connolly as coach was more a case of 'it's not a step up from Daniher' than 'he's terrible'. Plenty of respect for Connolly and absolutely stoked to see him back in the red and blue and playing an important part that I believe he is well suited to. And as much as he has been saying clearly that he is not 'a back-up option' or anything like that, I think it would be very useful to have recent top-level coaching experience when you're building a relationship with a new coach. Ahhh... the future is just starting to look a little brighter. I still want Viney for midfield coach...

Yep, it's hard to get AA selection when you've played 17 games or less... and since that covers all but half a dozen of our team, I guess that's the way it goes. With a clean injury run Bell might have been a run at it in the back pocket. Definately one of the better players in the position. Then again, with a clean injury run, I'm sure Rivers would have had CHB sewn up weeks ago

Yep, I'm rapidly warming to him too. I've stopped even thinking about Sheedy (my original preferred coach) and I'm just taking a look at the Melbourne Coach, and I'm liking each thing I see/hear. Particularly enjoyed his comments about 'not putting hurdles in front of young players' and so on. If I had a major gripe about our past coaching, then the apparent attitide that 'a kid can do this, a kid can do that, but a kid can't do the other thing' would be the one. Any time a new guy shows some special promise, enough to get ahead of the conveyor belt, they are touted as next captain, leadership material, superstar today, all the hype. A change in attitude there could be very rewarding, both on results for the kids (less constrained = more initiative) and for the senior players (loss of 'automatic' status relative to kids = greater competitiveness) And the guy looks much better in a Demons guernsey than a Port one, I swear he looks less bald all the time...