Rod Grinter Riot Squad

30 years on, I want a better ending

Pickett loves starting his own threads on topics that have been covered many times!

They changed the zone structure a bit. I can remember the boundary rider talking in one of the games about how it was usually TMac as last man in defence and how the a coach on the bench spent a lot of the day barking directions on where to position himself

Didn't he borrow one for that court case last week?

The haves and the have nots? like the old saying on how most people from Adelaide have two wits, half wits and .... ....

Pretty much a perfect day. Norf get rolled, 'Aints have their season finished and we get a solid win in Adelaide. sure the game wasn't perfect, but anyone whinging should pull their heads out of their backsides and enjoy another good win.

i agree they were better in the second, but we have taken everything they have thrown at us, now we have to come out and finish their season in an emphatic fashion, enough for us to start to give Norf a scare.

Has Viney ever had a good game against Port?

Who are you?

Dropped again, can't get a game over a yank who hardly know the game. wouldnt give it a second thought.

He is a classic example of having patience with big men. Less than two years ago, I think it is safe to say most people on here wanted Gawn delisted. He is now the league's best ruckman

He lifted his arm for a bump to the body, please do tell, what is wrong with that?

Sorry, but the Cyril bump was correctly called play on and the fact he has copped a fine is a disgrace

Oh, I am not surprised at all. TBH I would have been fine if Mitchell got off, or only copped a fine, as it really was quite minor, but to say it was a pushing action and not a striking motion is just ludicrous

This is a joke. firstly, I assumed Rioli got a fine for the tackle, but no nothing there, instead a fine for a perfect bump to the body. secondly, Sicily was deemed as medium impact. Are they joking. third, Mitchell was said to have made a pushing action, not a striking action. Now I know they are taking the p155. All 3 decisions farcical IMO

#freepasshawthorn

Think it was 22.6 from memory

Got to love the children who try be a smart ass from the world go and then get upset when it comes back there way. Let me ask you a question, we do have some ex- basketballs as you pointed out. Which of them (or any other players) remonstrated with Gibson for his highly dangerous act

What argument? Have had arguments with others, all here in black and white in this thread. Each made their point. you may well be a namby pamby, can't really say as despite the fact you have obviously posted here for a long time, you are obviously very forgettable as the name isn't familiar... this is just some emotional buffoon trying to be a smart arse while he soils his pants when he thinks someone will get hurt

Do I think some incidental contact with the hips in a marking contest could cause serious injuries? Highly doubt it, but it is a contact sport (until people like you ruin it completely). What Gibson did was different to what happens in basketball, as I have pointed out a few times, but obviously comprehension isn't your strong point. keep trying with you lame attempts at put downs, you do them better than make an argument.

- I have made clear my opposition to tunnelling. - I love the way the umpires cop it big time here for a pathetic performance in the game yet now they have perfect knowledge - as one commentator said"if that gets paid it will change the face of the..." Before another one jumps in to cover for the umpires, not uncommon at all. -I have made it clear why I find the decision ridiculous, you can carry on with your emotional BS arguments and hop into beds with the umpires or actually look at my argument in the thread and feel free to counter them or is that too hard for you?

Could call it an 8 point turn around... We were royally screwed that game and it is North wobbling

We were 5 points down, if his point stood it would have had us losing by 4

I never used Ro argue with "Irememberwhen" ?

Is there any way the moderators can set up the forum so Saty and WYL never have to ability to see or respond to each other's posts?