beelzebub

I think hes just as nuttty as Hird and wants a grand stage

A blistering and correct assessment

naaahhh bit like an Auction...only really starts and get interesting as the hammer is about to drop for the 3rd time ( for the first time ) ...then its game on. We're nearing that

As proffered before ....its ALL political. Everything is skewed and biased towards the franchise teams. We should in honesty stop even think about PP's and get our head around how you advance your list through intelligent thinking. PP in reality is a slackers get out of jail free pick. . Im not saying we couldnt use one but we'll never get another and as such so be it. We need to think like a clever team and stop this reliance on help

They ought not get a PP they should however seek some IQ

"" Roos added that James Frawley is set to spend greater time down back for the rest of 2014. “He’ll probably play back a little bit more than forward in the seven games to go,” he said. "" more power to your meter perhaps !!

I too was waiting for a number to appear. Must have been ghost written by Chip's manager !!

Damning and factual need not be mutually exclusive I suggest they are damning because they are factual

So the team that played in a GF as recently as 3 ago is deserving of a PP ? Dont think so. If they flounder for a few more seasons then maybe. They are a victim of their own stupidity. Picked them as the spooners after last years trade/draft So be it

Dont utter that to a Canadian......ever lol

I thought Molly was ok..lol But Robbo....seriously....do yourself a favour .........

Colin..and I ask this seriously Surely team Chemistry is done no favour if you have the wrong ones either ?

WJ I fully understand your sentiment .I say its dead because its politically unpalatable because it is. Had this not been the case WE would and should have got one. The PP was taken off the burner and left to cool...Its stone cold now

yes....this is where we will better the list. Agree 100%

Saty, when Trengove strings together half a dozen games and shows some of his original pizazz , then and only then will I consider him "fine" currently I have him as a NQR. Hes not alone

I dont agree with where every name sits in relation to their demise but that really only goes to semantics of sorts. Overall its on the money in terms of defining the nature of our mess. There are players whose ceiling inst high enough to impact sufficiently on the caliber of the teamsheet There are players who whilst they have talent seldom seem able to bring it for reasons of injury or for want of any word, gusto. We have some players who are just too green, but hopefully will develop and we've got some who are flawed gems We have a handful of really good players, some unfortunately wont be at the MFC long enough. Theres an article today about StKilda's lost years. Weve got ours as well I seem to recall when Roos first came a team sheet appeared with some names indicating who were a starting point and the gaps were to be filled in over the course of the season(s) I have a sneaking suspicion that sheet has shrunk in a fashion with less names as certainties and more placed into the 'not quite sure" basket In and of itself that isnt a bad thing as I feel comfortable suggesting the FD has a very good handle on where we are and what e need to do and the type of players it will go seek in order to "go forward and up"

Im really quite bemused at the lengths that the cheer squad are going to muddy the facts and in so doing attempt to co-op public opinion. In talking to a few acquaintances and some good mates it does strike me how a lot of the public dont actually understand the nitty gritty. Some do , a lot don't. Even my wife thinks I'm maniacally obsessed with this (hmmmm...maybe...) but we here on D land have sought to find out what it really is about. Dare I say Caro's article of today really puts it back on the straight and narrow and is a fine return of serve to the Essendon lackeys. So much is done to turn public opinion one way or another but I dont really see what that can achieve as I'm bloody sure a very learned Judge wont be swayed one way or another by all of this codswallop !!

lets rewind..but purposely YOU ,A of B agreed with RPFC that getting hing upon execution misses the pojnt That is the pojnt. You missed it Execution is the skill..its what he lacks go fish nice try If you stopped focusing on the poster and looked to the problem maybe youd make sense

it wont, they wont he wont theyre stuffed

Fairfax fallen out of love with Windy Hill ....film at 11

youre so precious Bob it was your inference to RP's post.. dont you read ??

why ? do you not rate skills ?

yeah skills....so overrated

happened