beelzebub

its nothing to do with whetherh Clark is allowed a play buddy. Its called priority. Another big forward whose only role is that is NOT our priority.. Creating an engine that can power a team and act like a valve by pushing th eball forward and resisting it in return lowering the pressure on an all too often over run defence IS.How can people NOT see its the MIDFIELD we spend miney on...not some obsession with collecting forwards. We have forwards. We have NO real midfield to speak of...not a complete workign replenishable one. How hard can this bloody be

Christ I hope he goes to the Blues for an inflated amount. Please Melbourne Dont sign this bloje.

unless youre French ne c'est pas ?

touche

the sad thing is....he probably still does !!!

an interesting idea there Red.

no..but its a few blocks too far for many to travel in arriving at balanced view !!

Dont go there H T. Theres no coming back.. lol Ogres and talking donkeys live there its so far away !!!"""

getting a bit logical in your old age there mate

You have to say it right you realise......its, $cullda !!!

You would hope the club is always open to revise its thinkings in terms or how things have actually panned out. The decision to remove Green was made at the beginning of year. It was done to focus on the youth etc etc etc. It was also as demonstrative as it was effectual. Im not sure its been an unqualified success.. Anex officio role may well cater to the benefits also. All im suggesting is lets hope the club , and indeed Green , thinks about his clearly and completely. I want the best outcome for the club. I feel Green has deserved to be repsected. We balls up so much inthe past. Lets learn, lets get smarter.

Been thinking about this. Its an interesting one. We are not blessed with an excess of mature players able toprovide the type of mentorship and stewardship often wished for at this club.. Whilst I didnt rate Green that highly as a captain I certainly think he has leadership, it just wasnt suited to gameday. Depending, and this is the qualifier, depending; on how the clean out goes and how the club NOW views these things and on the presumption the Rookie list remains I wouldnt be adverse to the idea that Green is mature-rookied. It would be up to him and the club. I dont think hed be taking away anyones job there but he might be able to take a few kids and show them some footy nouse. If ravaged again by injury the team could call him up. Its only an idea. Not even promoting it as the best one. Some may simply suggest , thanks and go. That would be fine also. Sometimes you have to think outside the box

we probably need another board... the "Demonland-Kindergarten"

I thought the holidays were over

there's no 'may' !!

Cant see anything in the papers referring to any offer...curious Youd think theyd be all over this ...the vultures

care to enlighten. Or do cryptic comments carry some sort of mystique that you enjoy.

its all part of the PC strategy !!

if anyone is offering 7 years they ought to be sacked

its not April 1...nor school holidays...hmmmm Nupp...cant account for such a ridiculous suggestion 7 years...pish posh.

I agree...posted something like this on another thread. Be interesting to look back one day )

heres some earth shattering news for you ...and many others.They were wrong.... yes these gods of footy are fallible...who'd da thunk. By Malthouse's admission the Collingwood knowledge of Melbourne was somewhat cursory. They only delved to a depth that they had to. Neeld himself backed this notion up himself. As to Voss....his success is marginally better than Tony Shaws. Such commendation !!

sobering isnt it !!!

god helpus !! insert face-palm.I was simply prasing the comment and suggesting it be highlighted for all..

Put that up in NEON !!! halelujah !!