whatwhat say what

i thought it just required three consecutive dots? obviously op got it all wrong with four, either way... from first gogol search result (and thus, the only one that anyone will pay attention to): An ellipsis ( ... ) consists of three evenly spaced periods and is used to indicate the omission of words or suggest an incomplete thought. In general, an ellipsis should be treated as a three-letter word, with a space, three periods and a space.

turner was terrific in the final round against the bloods at the scg and him being dropped for the final the fortnight later was a bit of a surprise i'm very confident he will be a very important player for us going forward

listen at 2x speed and you barely notice um

bingo https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/gather-round-more-like-blather-round-if-you-ask-me-20240408-p5fi89.html

who builds their graphics for videos? need a magnifying glass to read that list on the video

not if it's against his beloved bloods he won't

my wife and son saw him at the local cannings they had the same reaction - "he's HUGE" disappointingly, they reported that george in his arms looks like a normal sized child for his age...disappointing

heeney just about lapping the field

he said the same about pickett this time last year too two first round picks please - one for every premiership he'll have at the mfc at the end of 2024

i can't think of another 'professional' league where the 'officiating officials' are part-timers how do you accordingly hold them to account? in the afl, they don't he's looking the goods as a tall defender

if i was in charge of the peptides, i'd let McGrath go as a free agent at the end of the year if you got a band 1 compo pick for him pros: - he is clearly a leader around the club - he speaks will in the media cons: - if he's a leader, what does it say about their leadership? - he can't play midfield (cos he's too slow) - he's not the #1 rebound defender (that's martin) - he's arguably not their #2 rebound defender (that's laverde) - he's not 'smart' enough to play on the #1 small forward (rioli tore him to shreds in the first half, which was all i saw) so is he really worth keeping given he's probably going to want to be paid like a #1 pick expects to be?

potd

it's a bit disingenuous tho - forgarty and wigg were both 'local products'

and the most annoying thing is that basically doesn't apply any more we got stuffed by an arbitrary rule change that has since changed, again

he was set for midfield for the season prior to bowey being broken

but why change it when he's 30 games in and settled and a key part of our most important area? it's not just about his excellent ball use for me; it's about how good he is defensively

see also: park, kardinia

there's a lot of pagan at the baggers about it

true, but he's settled, playing great footy, and we set up to rebound defensively - which is why he's quickly become such a key player for us i don't understand the fascination of taking a key player in one part of the ground and moving him into another

norwood oval is a fantastic suburban ground

off to the tribunal to argue it was low impact (which is what it was) don't hire adrian anderson!

great call on the enright comparison

why? it'd be pretty easy to argue that there's not a better small defender currently playing in the afl his commitment to whole team defence and ability to use the ball so efficiently out of d50 makes him an absolute weapon we've got ourselves a beauty

facetious post didn't work when written down, perhaps...

anb over rankine on the half-forward flank and spaz over anyone on the bench