whatwhat say what

it works when it does, and when it doesn't it doesn't

really thought disco turner was bog from my spot far from mordor at home in the heartland harmes really wishes he was dusty martin with those fend-offs

Agreed yet ironically some of his kicking tonight was ghastly

ben brown with a brilliant forward stoppage ruckwork for a white rove and goal

as if a forward wouldn't kick it from the mark by the square on his natural right foot snap around the body sometimes i like yr commentary; sometimes i think you look for issues where there are none deakyn smith a couple of nice marks down back, and brown continues to work hard up and back

dunno if it's the quality of video or the angle of the camera or what have you, but sideshow bob looks thinner tonight and has moved up to the wings with a bit more attack on the ball in the air

shoulda been called holding the ball ffs perfect tackle execution i loathe geelong

given the incredible pressure we maintained either side of the main break, was it really that much of a surprise that we dropped off as badly as we did in the last? also. i would suggest the 'average' output of 163 is also fairly meaningless - i'd like to see a breakdown based on ten minute increments, as the puddy tatts absolutely dominated that first 10 mins of the last before we were able to put some pressure back on them

100% he should've been an ausltralian that's an appalling effort by scanlen's first they took out the chewing gum and then they didn't create a card for lord nev? disgraceful!

at times like this i stick with the maxim of [f-expletive] football; it's a [s-expletive] sport and i hate it

it's the second time we've avoided a blow out in losses if only the lights went off last night we might've won! with the d50 transition scoring, i can't believe how easily we allow teams to exit d50 - our set-up defensive zone would appear to me to have moved back a contest compared to earlier in the year

for a real retro round we could play them at the g...

let's see how the magoos go tomorrow at least they're playing on friday nite not a sunday ahead of a trip to the alice for the seniors the following week

6: Viney 5: Salem 4: Rivers 3: Petracca 2: Hunter 1: Lever

Fine theory, but this game would be played at Docklands not the G, and would cost the club $500k and mean we needed to find a new sponsor rather than the NT govt

to lose to the puddy tatts with their best forward, their best two midfielders missing is very, very poor

our lack of ability to stop run-ons is a real issue

i loathe geelong and i cannot STAND hawkins and his constant whinging and whining

i'd argue his run was blocked and it should've been his free

what on earth are you talking about...at quarter time, we were behind; at half time, we're in front in these conditions, you take it

tough ol watch on kayo - wet weather actually helped mask our horrific skill level

with these sorts of conditions, any lead is a good lead!

hand or hamstring? there was some fear it was tendon damage for the latter, i believe? the level of time out would be more in keeping with that i hope we never ever debut a player as a sub hate it when other clubs do that - puddy tatts are a regular offender

only really the one certainty, you'd think, this round them? bears? bloods peptides? filth? gc17?

methinks he was referring to tomlinson