Everything posted by whatwhat say what
- GAMEDAY: Practice Match vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Practice Match vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Practice Match vs Carlton
-
2024 Injury List
he was made skipper AFTER this happened
-
2024 MRO & Tribunal
moloney he missed, and still got suspended
-
2024 MRO & Tribunal
recidivist and did it in a bad week in which to elect to bump not tackle the worst one I've ever seen is neal-bullen's suspension for a sling tackle - where he let go of the crom dude and his head clunked the ground due to the whipping motion; there was no sling from memory, anb got three in a 17 game season; we appealed and it got EXTENDED to 4 disgraceful almost as bad as when trengove copped 3 for dangerfield being a wuss, going down like he'd been broken in half, and being perfectly fine the next week when he dominated and booted 6
-
NON-MFC: Practice Matches
tigers supporter, isn't he?
-
CASEY: Practice Match vs Carlton
1 aflx premiership 1 vfl premiership 1 afl premiership 1 aflw premiership
-
CASEY: Practice Match vs Carlton
someone should write pert and roffey a stern letter 📝 about how bad our marcomms are
- GAMEDAY: Practice Match vs Carlton
-
Training Ground?
marcomms are not, it is safe to say, one of mfc's strengths
-
2024 Injury List
had a rotten run
-
PREGAME: Practice Match vs Carlton
from a graphic design friend... 1. It's hard to read, even on a large screen. Both the size and the compact font are a bad rookie choice. 2. There's WAY too much empty space 3. Where are the positions? 4. What time is the match? 5. They put Carlton's logo on the graphic but not Melbourne's 6. The emergency list is TINY 7. Don't use that serial killer font, no one can read it on a small screen and we're not in high school 8. It's BAAAAAAAAAAAAAD
-
NON-MFC: Practice Matches
1.7 "forward connection"
-
NON-MFC: Practice Matches
yze's brought mfc goalkicking accuracy to rfc
-
NON-MFC: Practice Matches
filth side looks very strong, although i'd say murphy is a big missing player for them fascinating that after his series of head knocks he's not been medically retired
-
2024 Opening Round Team
on the scg you really don't need that many talls tho as i said, i expect schache will get the gig but based on 7 praccy terms of footy, verrall showed more both in the ruck and up forward for mine
-
2024 Opening Round Team
based on 7 terms of practice... 2024 opening round 23: B: McVee - May - Tomlinson HB: Rivers - Lever - Bowey C: Langdon - Petracca - Windsor HF: ANB - JVR - Billings F: Pup Brown - Fritsch - Chandler Foll: Gawn - Salem - Viney I/c: Howes - Verrall - Sparrow - Woewodin Sub: Laurie unavailable: spargo - brayshaw (sob) - hunter - oliver - melksham - mcadam - plugger mac - petty - pickett - sideshow bob i personally would prefer it if we went smaller and had no tomlinson in the backline, but i suspect the intention is to run with that structure i also somehow doubt this line-up will happen as it'd mean four debutants to start the season which would be pretty unusual for us; for instance based on @Demonland's latest training report schache is still favoured over verrall if we ever debut a player as a sub i for one will be really disappointed; hate it when clubs do that
-
PRESEASON TRAINING: Tuesday 27th February 2024
Sam Edmund on SEN says Clayton will feature in the VFL scratch match prior to the AFL scratch match.
-
NON-MFC: Match SIMs
he seems a total space cadet but boy oh boy can he play footy
-
2024 Opening Round Team
10 months would have him returning to playing by july that's achievable and anything earlier would be a bonus
-
2024 Opening Round Team
no, but from all reports he is significantly ahead of schedule
-
2024 Opening Round Team
milkshake will be back mid-year, not 2025
-
A Celebration of Gussy: Rd 01 vs Bulldogs
gotta use the pic of him with the cigar holding the premiership medal aloft "always an mfc champion"
-
Compensation for the loss of Angus
jon ralph, who tends to just re-write media releases, says that the afl - unsurprisingly - doesn't have a protocol to deal with a player medically retired with a significant amount of time left upon their deal BRAYSHAW UNCERTAINTY The AFL is expected to have discussions with Melbourne about the salary cap implications of Angus Brayshaw’s retirement given he has five more seasons left on his contract. The league medically retired Brayshaw and while the Demons spent Thursday farewelling their premiership star, his position will clearly set a precedent for all clubs. Brayshaw could agree to accept a smaller figure on a contract of between $700,000-$800,000 as part of an agreement with the club or the AFL could grant the Demons some cap relief. Rival list bosses agreed there was no set protocol for medical retirements given most players to retire recently including Marcus Adams, Paul Seedsman and Paddy McCartin did not have long-term deals. The AFL’s intervention into Brayshaw’s career will give the Demons the best chance of reducing the cap implications of his deal until 2028. reads to me like we're going to be carrying the hefty salary in our cap for the extent of the remainder of the deal - that would be very, very annoying indeed