daisycutter

rather ironic, uncle, that the venerable (now outraged) mcc wrote the rules of cricket - haha (or should that be hawhaw?)

a thought out of left field I wonder how disco would go up forward. He's just languishing in the magoos because our back spots are so tight. he's a great kick, mark and interceptor. If he played like a defender in the backline, he'd just have to mark, turn around a and kick goals - lol

and 2028 is a long way off

sounds reasonable, but then they'd just saturate the web even more than they do now. might be better under regulation to set a maximum % of turnover allowed for any and all advertising as a license condition. just thinking out aloud

nah, just a 60's porn star fan

64,939

i guess he preferred the nickname rick, then

and let's not forget the famous dr. feelgood, sally cockburn

and then there was a neighbour's mother named fanny alcock ... true dinks

double that

fmd

agree but i was really addressing the inference that because it was not actioned (fine or suspension) that the free should not have been awarded or that fritter should have got the free for htb. free and suspension require different degrees of "dangerous" it seems to me that bump/hit head then suspended, so maybe tackle to ground/hit head then big trouble, probable suspension. but the mitigating circumstances are very murky at the moment.

surely (theoretically) you can have a "dangerous" tackle resulting in a free but falling short of being worthy of a suspension. i don't see anything inconsistent with that. it's all a matter of degrees. not saying it was necessarily dangerous in this case because it is impossible nowadays to know what is dangerous per the new interpretations and if so how exactly the mro can rate and penalise it in an understandable way.

i'm not so sure. iirc, without redhecking replay, i think rohan hit him with his head, not the shoulder, so it was a head-to-head accident. rohan was probably lucky he wasn't concussed too

the whole of windy hill was just one big urinal most punters didn't bother going to the toilet sheds ... unless they were good swimmers

what they are saying at kardinia park cast, row 1, knit 5, purl 29, knit 5, row2 ........................................zzzzzzz

last year from this point on, we added about 4k. repeat that and we end up about 68.75. i expect they will come up with some "marketing" incentives to try to reach 70k. we will wait and see, eh?

here ya go, dz. just peanuts, but. 64,751

and i just loved his 2 sixes in one root over. that made such a difference at a key time

i guess numbers are lower now and they are probably going for weekly updates maybe tonight's the lucky night?

what are you talking about, old55? 😗there is no and has never been any tanking in the afl. Demetriou and mclachlan have made this clear on many occasions.

they could always switch name to the bummers and have a logo of a graphic designer's representation of james hird's backside

nevertheless, both sides lost the same number of wickets - 18 one side won

not shown but temperature at 7pm is 7.1 c, (feels like 4.5 c) wind at 18km/h