daisycutter

got a fridge full of them, biffo. unfortunately for me they are reserved for the grand kids

i was thinking of getting a cavalier king charles spaniel as a guard dog to protect me from the ajax scourge, uncle. should double as a nice tax deduction.

are you being earist, uncle?

well let's hope he becomes a has-been this year. you left out the dorks.

makes sense. put the savings towards the fyfe war-chest

what happened to the countdown? don't tell me the draft has been held already

Dank gives no reasons for no paper work i don't know where he banks, but i'd give his bank a wide berth

you think so?...............stay tuned.........got a few more years to play out

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-25/stephen-dank-fails-absence-evidence-anti-doping-appeal-board/8059342 http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/afl/more-news/stephen-dank-misses-deadline-to-provide-evidence-why-he-did-not-attend-appeal-to-afl-antidoping-appeals-board/news-story/9daba1a181c870b941ddba368a97dce9

has a habit of misplacing paperwork, jack. i'm sure it will turn up some time tp prove the player's innocence and get jobe his brownlow back.

according to hun. watson, heppell and carlisle are yet to get their millions. maybe these drawn out negotiations are affecting his 'passion'? and talking of passion but not moving on, bomber's chairman, lindsay tanner, continues to poke the bear by again declaring yesterday that "former coach james hird was welcome at the club at any time". how long can this club continue to wallow in denial?

i always wondered if it was because of d-l that we no longer have a font choice

funny how the hun made a big deal of his (fanciful) claims of how he was going to prove the innocence of the players and get jobe his brownlow back. here's a guy who continually loses court cases, fails repeatedly to turn up to hearings, fails to abide by legal court requirements yet the hun makes a bigger point reporting his hollow claims of "getting jobe's brownlow back". the quality of journalism these days is so pathetically low and downright lazy

lol - there is a very big presumption in your question that the 'people at essendon' actually know how to 'think'

and mr little

that must be the predominately white away jacket haven't you been listening bub. need a red or inverse one for away jacket

presumabty though. george, because this appeal is "de novo" and tb4 administration was part of the initial hearing, is it possible he could be found guilty of administering tb4? any lawyers want to comment?

reported in today's rage that oral submissions will be allowed in dank's appeal seems dank's team "thought" this wasn't allowed. they seem to be really on top of this appeal

might have troubles finding the dosh to pay one. his last lawyer on the ch9 case walked on him and guess what.......he represented himself!

you should try and get him down at the gat, biffo. he could probably do a whole season there and you could clean up too

our stephen does a lot of blustering, threatening and promising, but when things get to the pointy end he just disappears like a puff of smoke. then pops up at his next footy pie night to pick up a nice purse and offer a bit of salacious condemnation of all and sundry. surprisingly he is very popular at such high brow events. much like the table-top strippers who complete the show

so was HIS court action against ch9. didn't turn up to three consecutive hearings. judge dismissed case.

can't even see him turning up, bub

very much so....................................imo