Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. 6 from each team is the whole fwd + backline. this is far too restrictive if you did do it, 4 would be a more practical number
  2. drastic cut in rotations professional umpiring + documented clearly defined change in rule interpretations (holding ball, tackling, handball/throwing etc) zones won't work other more minor points: ball up quicker when ball locked in (as it used to be) allow deliberate points (as it used to be) allow deliberate out of bounds if not on the full (as it used to be) allow 2nd man up except at centre bounces (as it used to be) 25m (minor) + 50m (major) penalties
  3. richmond have also been blessed by a lack of injuries
  4. sorry about the binman tag, p-man (and binman) probably right about being a bit late, i was reading an article on fritzl just a few days ago and i guess the gorge was still sticking strong in my throat
  5. not sure fritzel is a good nickname, binman google a certain austrian pos named fritzl
  6. and andrews was so impressed by the ghan teledoco that he wants to call the proposed train service to the airport "the dhan"
  7. i believe "ghan - the musical" is already in rehearsal and lego are working on a set of ghan models
  8. 8567bc was a bugger of a year, earl........particularly nasty in hipsroy too
  9. he's a football club moll
  10. think there is cheaper options for reserved seats. I've got 11 game + reserved sets and iirc I payed about $50 extra for the seats. They are in the open in the northern stand (richmond side) and right next to the members (M50) i'm close to the wing. I asked for the rearmost seats so i'm just at the boundary of the undercover ones, so if it rains i can quickly move back a couple of rows as there is always spares.
  11. 40,160
  12. 39,787
  13. will we make 40k by 2:10 on saturday? 39,402
  14. cbnc
  15. dftft
  16. think there is a game of semantics being played out here, lucy all about what "approved" means afl are saying not approved as in recommended but approved as in allowed or nothing to stop it company is trying to treat approved as meaning afl sanctioned
  17. oh ffs.......there is a whole separate forum called the general forum for political proselytising......use it
  18. errr......wrong forum
  19. daisycutter replied to beelzebub's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    but the point specifically for wines was that he was essentially ready and was "low maintenance" re development......same as vineyl wines would have been a star wherever he went
  20. daisycutter replied to beelzebub's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    ummmm...... he was developed by draft day......a walk up starter
  21. not from leighoak, that ends this july and i suspect most of our gambling revenue comes from leighoak not bentleigh. but that's only my guess
  22. no decent profits in selling smokes, wyl
  23. are you describing capitalism, binman?
  24. some truth in that. i remember decades ago they tried to get sports betting up and it was a real failure. i think the internet, graphics, technology and smart phones have played a big part not only making it more available and immediate but adding a lot of "glamour" to it
  25. is there gaming entitlements at the leighoak venue like there are at the bentleigh club? if so, what % of gaming do we lose this July with the sale of leighoak?