daisycutter

something rotten at hangerland? or supplement effect wearing off?

nice to see essendrugs are maintaining their 3q tradition

the fact we hear little about him probably means he does a good job

ugly game to watch. giants can get any decent structure going

i like how hird has taken thompson's demise to turn it to the supplements program and how badly he (hird) was treated by everyone and victimised. it all about his ego and his refusal to accept reality

a scott bros loss would be a great way to start the round

it's a mfcss sort of thing i think?

no, not the spelling, just thought it a strange choice of word.......too woody for that lot of w@nkers

there is still the saturday fitness test for tracc and hoges

an interesting image if a teammate was in the protected area then his opponent could be too, niggling the teammate as he held the ball. of course the umpire would insist in clearing the protected area and finally, when the player handed the ball to his teammate it would be play-on or incorrect disposal so i think cp5 would be saved from tyson's kicking ?

effervess?????????????

i do have to laugh at "the club abandoned me" line. he got enormous support from the club, even if they didn't agree with every action he took. how entitled can one get

been watching footy at all levels since the 50's and never saw a place kick in a game even in the 50's it was considered a distant footnote in history ongarello's effort(s) were seen as an oddity at the time and only tolerated because there was no specific rule against it and it was so rare still no rule barring it, but the 30sec rule and unavailability of a kicking tee effectively would stop it

well peter hudson's stock kick was a flat punt.......and very effective it was at all distances

why would you want admin added to the list of blocked words?

bloody hell

there is more than one defendant, ldvc ? (but i know what you mean) and absence of dna evidence doesn't amount to 'clearing'

i understand, but until there is more info, i will maintain a 'healthy' degree of suspicion ? without going overboard

because 'contamination' of evidence is a police procedural problem and needs explanation of course in court, but not only in court no-one is saying dna (trace or otherwise) is a panacea, but it raises a red flag when the biggest amount of illicit drug is mysteriously 'contaminated' and cannot be tested for dna as all the other (smaller) samples were i am wary of 'coincidences' especially in controlled and carefully planned operations like this . anyway, enough said already, i will follow this aspect with interest

well i could have guessed that much too, but then like you i would just be speculating or are you saying you have specific knowledge? nevertheless a public explanation is required from the police

26 games for 28 goals ?

true, with respect to the football dept. However, our HQ and administrative centre plus shop are in East Melbourne 3002 so we are split between the melbourne and east melbourne post codes (both being in the City of Melbourne Council boundaries)

docklands and east melbourne are both in the city of melbourne boundary. neither docklands or east melbourne are in the sub division of melbourne ("suburb") within the "city" of melbourne sorry to shoot the messenger

i'm just suspicious in cases like this of "contamination" and asking for clarification police are highly trained in forensic sampling procedures, especially in pre-organised raids nothing personal re thompson re the mdma. just a desire for proper procedure. after that "let the chips fall where they may"

I don't understand this dna contamination of the 839gm of mdma i always understood they could detect (differentiate) multiple dna profiles in a sample and could therefore at least determine if there was any dna from thompson even where there was police dna on it due to mishandling unless.... it was suspected that the handling of another item by the police could have transferred thompson's dna from that item to the mdma whatever, i think this 'contamination' needs to be further explained publicly to eliminate any accusations of 'tampering' with evidence especially as the mdma would appear to be the largest example of 'commercial' level trafficking