daisycutter

so i suppose robert harvey shouldn't hold the 1997 brownlow? Chris grant polled highest that year but ruled ineligible, just like watson will be.

care to expand on that doc? i know it's late in the day and i function better in the mornings, but i'm not very clear on what you are censuring

i personally don't care whether he handed it back 2 months ago, now, or in fact ever, it's the afl 's job to manage that, not watson's.. the issue that irks me most is the inability of the afl to make timely decisions and to try and stage-manage watered down deals. they even invited watson, mitchell and cotchin to make submissions of what they thought the decision should be, puleeze!

sounds like a great junket, froggy. what's new to learn about roads you can't get out of a book or the web and what's wrong with a video conference

you mean i don't use a coat-hanger?

i've got a maple tree on my nature strip. might try to extract some syrup it's acer rubrum also known as october glory (not to be confused with morning glory, ethan)

If he admitted to taking peds during his brownlow year then there would be a problem I don't think admitting to "recreational" only drugs in his brownlow year would be

george, i can't see how that resolves all issues such that the afl don't have to make a decision. all it does it make this decision somewhat easier. they would still have to decide if the official records will show watson as the winner or whatever. if they then decide he is not the official winner of record then they have to make the decision as to whether there is no winner or the next placed players become the official winners of record. just returning a medal in itself means nothing. only the afl can decide the official status of record.

all that is fine, but you must realise that they have had more than enough time to investigate those aspects. additionally gil and other executives have made too many sympathetic public statements that just indicate that their prevarication is more about finding an excuse to not take it off watson. they have never really accepted the cas verdict and instead of keeping their mouths shut, accept the verdict and move on like you would expect of a professional body they just dither in their weakness and make it all the more a circus. [to me at least, the cotchin/mitchell decision is also easy. they should get it and there is plenty of precedent to support that.]

oh come on ldvc. they have had at least 12 months to consider that. no need to act the apologist, their response has been glacial

there is no deal required. it's not a hard or difficult decision. it's an easy decision. all they have to do is apply the rules. qed.

well we've had 10 years of vanilla, od. but i hope those days are over

banana or vanilla?

David Schwarz's mother Mary, who placed Farmer on a pedestal above even her son, to leave the MCG at half-time

heads-up for mr. leg. movie "red 2" just starting on channel 10

seems jobe disagrees with you

could mr leg be the riddler? he is certainly good at pulling our legs

i presume mr leg is busy watching the bruce wiilis movie tonight about his previous life titled just "red"

they will probably wait till the turn of the century to make a decision and hope everyone will have forgotten

yeah, keep your money in your wallet

hibberd is an english name derived from the normans

anyone know what bomberblitz are saying?

there is a whole day to go, luci.......mahoney can still weave some magic

i like the symmetry of next years 2nd rounder last year we gave a 2nd rounder for melksham and had to wait a year. this time they can wait for a year......only fair imo

may be stronger but not necessarily deeper. next year's 2nd round pick will be in the 30's (maybe well into?)