Redleg

Picket, be happy, Jeffo is playing himself back into the AFL side.

Not certain, but think Adams' opponents have 7 goals to half time.

There is absolutely no such thing as " holding the ball" in the VFL.

Our ball handling is simply atrocious. Can't pick up the ball, pass it or receive it. Hawks should be further ahead and look a class above us atm. Max looks good on the positive side and Jeffo doing well. and could have three. Haven't seen Luker touch the ball yet.

Are you saying that Rowell, Anderson and Miller is an ordinary midfield?

I tip someone to post that Humphrey was pathetic and didn't get a possession.

That is our big problem today. I just don’t see us getting first use of the ball often enough. Our pressure is going to have be sky high and our ball handling at its best. This will be a real test for us and our new game style.

Maybe secret recordings of meetings could lead to litigation in certain circumstances depending where some people online are and then the use it was put to. Chat says: In Australia, the legality of secretly recording an online meeting depends primarily on your location and whether you are a participant in the meeting. [1, 2] State-by-State Consent Laws Australian laws regarding "listening devices" (which include smartphones and computers used for online meetings) vary by jurisdiction: [1, 2] One-Party Consent (VIC, QLD, NT): In Victoria, Queensland, and the Northern Territory, it is generally legal to record a private conversation if you are a participant in that conversation. You do not need the consent of other parties to make the recording for personal use. All-Party Consent (NSW, SA, WA, TAS, ACT): In New South Wales, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, and the ACT, it is a criminal offense to record a private conversation without the consent of all parties involved. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Federal Law and Telecommunications The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 prohibits the interception of communications "passing over" a telecommunications system. [1, 2] Direct Connection: Recording a call by "direct connection" to the system (e.g., a wiretap) is a federal offense, regardless of state law. External Devices: Recording audio after it has left the speaker (e.g., using an external dictaphone or handheld recorder next to the computer) generally falls under state surveillance laws rather than the federal TIA Act. [1, 2, 3, 4] Workplace Implications Even in states where recording is legal, doing so secretly in a workplace context carries heavy risks: [1, 2] Disciplinary Action: Secretly recording a work meeting is often considered a breach of the "duty of good faith" and trust, which can be valid grounds for summary dismissal even if no crime was committed. Admissibility: Courts and the Fair Work Commission have the discretion to exclude secret recordings from evidence if they determine the "desirability of admitting the evidence" is outweighed by the "undesirability" of how it was obtained. [1, 2, 3] Exceptions In "all-party consent" states, you may be able to record without consent if it is "reasonably necessary" for the protection of your lawful interests (e.g., documenting threats or harassment), but this is assessed strictly on a case-by-case basis by the courts. [1, 2, 3]

.

So Caro, if correct and how does she also know all the details, says someone ( assuming a player partner ) recorded the meeting and then provided a copy of the recording to Tom Morris. Then someone, presumably the same person or their Player/ partner alerted the AFLPA. Did the recording person know what was to be discussed, or just on a whim decide to privately record a meeting without telling those involved? Then did they after the meeting discuss it with the club? This one can reasonably deduce, was done to cause trouble. NASA we have a problem.

But a much bigger thank you to North.

Don’t fret Bluey, we have removed two toilet roll holders from the plans and that will keep it at $100m.

Sorry If I am misunderstanding your point, but what is wrong with a Zoom type meeting to welcome Player Partners including new Players’ Partners and introduce the new CEO and Coach?

Moderators, something strange, Isn’t this my post with another author named?

Let us know if he is participating at the Captain’s run and that should be even more informative.

So what do we actually know? We know that a player and his partner were discussed at a partners’ online meeting with club officials. We know that the intention of the meeting was a welcome and to show that the club supported players and their partners. We know that this discussion occurred, but that it wasn’t the reason for the meeting. We don’t know what specific details were discussed and if they were public knowledge, or private communications, or came from other sources. We don’t know if any person prior to the meeting asked for some info on the situation, for whatever reason. We know that someone leaked the meeting to the media. We don’t know how the other attendees felt about the discussion. We don’t know if the leaker was accurate, truthful, or had an ulterior motive for involving the media. We don’t know if the person who went to the media, first raised a concern with the club and if they did, what the club response was and why they then felt it necessary to go public. We don’t know if anyone, including Officials present, suggested an end to the discussion or that it was inappropriate to discuss. We do know for a fact though, that many on here love to go off without proper and full knowledge and understanding of an issue and spout garbage condemning people.

Yes, very interesting if he trains and even more so, then plays.

Curtin, Laird, Hinge, Ah- Chee, Butts, Keane, Draper and Cumming that I can recall.

Crows have 8 of their best out and their whole defence.

That’s more than plenty on here.

It was there, but that is now 5 of their first 6 goals from frees.

All of Carlton’s 4 goals so far are from frees.

Thanks for the best post on this issue so far.

Daz even the experts get it wrong a lot of the time. Look at the post after yours, where Mitch Cleary got it wrong on Riv playing this week. We don't need to blame our insiders or track watchers, who try and give us accurate info, which I personally love to read. I would much rather read Dees info that is wrong, than people fighting and arguing and putting each other down, which is just boring garbage. I enjoy your posts too Daz, even when you occasionally get them wrong. 😉

You picked the two Pies I dislike the most too.