old55
-
Posts
9,524 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
38
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by old55
-
I think I see the big picture plan - next year Witts, then Darcy, then ROB and we've fully cornered the ruck market.
-
Now that @Redleg I will agree with you is a corrupt deal. The AFL should never have approved that.
-
I'm not 100% sure Max has thought this through fully. He's gone from rucking against Brodie twice a year to rucking against him at every training session.
-
Yes but quite frankly most of the Pies supporters in the thread were more reasonable than the Demons supporters. Danster - holy moly! I remember you from the RSFA days - "it's only other vets can understand"
-
Grundy deal crashed Big Footy ...
-
Sydney have 14, 17, 37, 75 and all next year's picks so if they finish the same 17, 36, 55, 73 Doubt we'd get 37 or F2nd, probably F3rd - something like 55 I wouldn't do it for that unless it closed another deal for us.
-
We could do 13 + 27 for 16 + 41 + Grundy. If the draft is even after the first few we could still get our player at 16, and 41 will come right in after Brisbane's F/Ss and we don't have a 2nd pick until 54.
-
JHF in contract, LJ out of contract - that's the big difference. North could have just said "see you same time next year Port, when Adelaide won't already be committed to Rankine"
-
I hope we hold Freo's F1st and F2nd, death riding them will provide some extra interest next season.
-
That cannot be right because Port are giving up F1, F2 and F2 and only getting F3 back, so they are still short F2, which was what the AFL refused to approve in the first place. 7 own the rights but know SFA, it's a disgrace.
-
We completed this trade and got the best deal we could, now moving onto other deals no doubt.
-
I wonder if Essendon will play Weid as a KPB. They've got Ridley and Stewart back there - and Francis is going.
-
If Richmond give 31 and F1st in the Hopper deal as predicted, their first pick this year is 88 and their 1st pick next year will be in the 2nd round.
-
No it enabled us to get Freo's F2nd in the Jackson trade.
-
Needs to be a good deal that enables us to do something useful to be worthwhile.
-
Doesn't sound like we will. We thanked him for his contribution
-
I think we're currently on track there Red. 4 out of the primary (Jackson, Bedford, Rosman, Hunt), 2 in (Grundy and Chandler upgrade) and 2 picks
-
So bitter ...
-
That's not going to happen.
-
F*^k with Freo's minds and make their state competitor pay a higher price.
-
We just need WC to make some sort of competitive bid for Jackson and Freo will up their offer. The spectre of a WC flag with Jackson is too nightmarish for Freo to survive.
-
Probably not, but I'm very happy for them to just miss out for the next 10 years again though
-
Whoa there. You're making way too much sense for this thread. WC 8 + F2 will make Freo sweeten their offer and WC will put it on the table just to stretch Freo if nothing else.
-
According to Footywire Bruce has one year to run on his current contract. https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/out_of_contract_players?year=2023&action=submit
