Jump to content

rpfc

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rpfc

  1. rpfc replied to adonski's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    This. Essendon would not agree to this trade if not for the fact THAT THEY WOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO USE ND9! No team is giving a top ten pick for essentially ND 28 and a delayed recompense of a top ten pick if we miss finals again ( the other picks are chum). Also, we have as many picks in the ND as we have gaps on the list so if people were worried about ‘later’ picks, don’t be. Love that we have been on the front foot with this pick trading the last decade.
  2. Ironically, we had a bloke from the AIS get us to finish off training with repeat 100s under a decreasing time split. Blokes hated it. So glad I was the one with the whistle.
  3. 2kms show speed and aerobic endurance. As you go further, endurance plays more of a part. As rotations have grown, clubs moved to 2km as more replicative of a rotation. Haven’t coached for 5 years but that’s why we made the move to 2km time trials/training.
  4. rpfc replied to Oxdee's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Everyone has a price… but yes it’s unlikely he moves because no one wants him as much as we need to recoup from him.
  5. Amazing aerobic capability that can transfer to roles like ANB or Langdon.
  6. rpfc replied to Oxdee's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
  7. rpfc replied to Oxdee's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yeah, if you say it enough…
  8. rpfc replied to Flag Favourites 3019's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Fit and happy Petracca, fit and moderately sane Oliver will help… When does a trade revolutionise or even revamp? Lever and May took a year to get going. Like another posted listed - improvement comes from within. Rivers and McVee continuing to allow CP5 more time forward, Petty being fit will give this experiment its final beta test, Pickett providing more explosiveness in the middle, AMW and Woey releasing others to do more in the backline, and continuing to commit to a game style that suits a team that has no dominant tall forward and needs to move the ball quickly, with dare, and not wait for May to kick it or for Gawn to mark it.
  9. Obviously, the mind and application is important. What do you think helps the mind? Also, at his level, getting the body to more is literally what pre-season training is all about.
  10. rpfc replied to WERRIDEE's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Cant replace your best players. Last year we were missing 3 of our top 6 players for half a season or more. *Oliver without a pre-season I consider missing. He is not 2024. He may never be what he was, but he can be more than 2024.
  11. rpfc replied to WERRIDEE's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Max ‘Straight sets’ Gawn Yeah? Clear em all out, yeah?
  12. rpfc replied to WERRIDEE's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    O.M.G. You do realise both Goodwin and Pert are under contract? So let’s suppose that Pert is as ‘dead in the water’ as you seem to presume based on your interpretation of rumour and intimation from reports; we simply cannot get rid of everyone at one time, and we are spending time replacing board members, a President, a forward line coach and a senior assistant/midfield/gameplay coach, we should be also spending time looking for a tall forward to replace Neitz… Let’s swap our coach and fire our CEO though. Thats what a solid club would do…🙄 These people aren’t evil, they may be incompetent but I doubt it, they may be on borrowed time, but we can have change to our benefit too… Can we all get back to reality?
  13. Is it? Or is that you only know the ‘truth’ burnished by PL and his hacks on here? And that you are making judgements and assumptions based on not much more than reports and court filings.
  14. rpfc replied to Oxdee's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    So this is who you are now? Mean spirited, reactionary, just anti-Pert bias? Life is rarely as black and white as you are reading the last few days, and clubs like ours can rarely afford to lose leadership so readily.
  15. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The news in that being they desired board spill and the fact that there was one brewing.
  16. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Sick hat. Corduroy? Thats phat. No cap. … NO I AM YOUNG
  17. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Don’t remember the random nuffy letters from Pies fans or Tigers fans in their recent nadirs… … Yes, I am aware they can’t write. Point stands.
  18. Why would Lyon want to do that show?
  19. No, but a curated board empowered and installed by the AFL did give us a flag and a united club.
  20. Again, excellent strawman you are creating for yourself and your obviously biased hawk friend. Autocracies huh? I am talking about the unnecessary descent into a purer ‘democracy’ for football boards leads to an anarchy that is not going to lead to success, not going to lead to a united club, not going to lead to the best outcome for the us as fans, but I think it will lead to what this ‘hawk’ wants…
  21. rpfc replied to Oxdee's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Oh you have that confirmed do you? Have you been hacked? WTF is going on?
  22. What is this? I expect better from who I believe was Binman’s PA yeah? As bing points out - you don’t know but you just know?? The board should be given the opportunity to balance itself and try to meet the needs of boards in this unique AFL landscape. Now you want to get rid of them and get a new ticket in? Great, then enough quality people will agree with you, the AFL will push for it, and you can vote for that or better yet create the media and pubic pressure to dissolve the board entirely. This isn’t the US sports landscape - we can do that. But until then, they are doing what we have entrusted them to do, your ‘inklings’ notwithstanding.
  23. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I can’t answer that counter factual only that it contributed to us not getting to prelims.