Everything posted by Smokey
-
Whole Game 666
Many players main skill set is scoring, so you implied just that.
-
Whole Game 666
So you want to protect the sanctity of the game by bringing in even more new rules? Really bizarre logic. You can’t just make up a new rule every time the game changes and you don’t like it, this is the exact same mindset that is killing footy as we know it. It’s all gotten confusing enough. Enough with the new rules, if anything the AFL should be focusing on reducing the amount of rules. I have zero problem with a low scoring game. In fact they can often be more interesting, I’m sure I’m not the only one who never had a problem with a lack of scoring. Even at its worst it’s still by far the highest scoring game of footy you can watch. AFL continuing to try to fix problems that weren’t even there at the behest of corporate executives trying to squeeze every dollar out of footy they can. More goals = more ads. Outta here with your ideas to further complicate a now highly complicated game.
-
Whole Game 666
Is it just me or is expecting a bunch of players to run back to their quadrant at every single stoppage in the time it takes the umpire to throw the ball up slightly unreasonable? All this would do is slow the game down. The game is over-officiated enough as it is.
-
Whole Game 666
Yeah, nah. That’s ridiculous.
-
What to do with Petracca?
While I’m sure your credentials in high performance sports management are well known, i’ll Trust he’s in exactly the shape our FD department wants him
-
What to do with Petracca?
If he sheds 5kg he inevitably loses some strength through the hips to withstand tackles. It's not worth it. People should stop obsessing over his body type and weight and encourage him to play to his strengths. His body is simply built this way. Sure, his cardio could improve I guess, but that doesn't necessarily need to correlate with his weight. Cardio capacity can be improved without significant weight loss. I like the way he is built, he's bloody hard to tackle.
-
What to do with Bruce Mcaveney
"Gee Bruce looooves a big occasion, doesn't he BT?"
-
Changes: Rd 05 v St. Kilda
I reckon the impending return of these players this year is already in his head, and perhaps he doesn't have the mental resiliency to keep putting in 100% knowing he doesn't get a game with May and Lever fully fit. I think Frost has gone past Omac comfortably this year, and that says plenty. And its not even a skill or ability thing, Frost is as prone as anyone to making blues but his athleticism sets him apart from Omac when they both have reasonably similar outputs otherwise. Having said that, we see the game a certain way and the coaches probably another. They are the ones with the intimate knowledge of the game plan, so maybe we are looking at the wrong metrics in assessing Omac. Long bow but still worth considering.
-
What to do with Petracca?
Still thinking of changing your username or are you back on board the Italian stallion train? I know I am
-
Changes: Rd 05 v St. Kilda
Both surprising and shocking. Never thought I'd hear you say this. Haha agreed
-
What to do with Petracca?
When he has less time to think about what he's doing and just does what comes naturally he is at his best. I hope the coaches identify this and encourage him to continue to take chances.
-
What to do with Petracca?
I love the way Trac is responding at the moment and I thought he was important last night. Hasn't had the break out game we all hope for yet but he's building week by week and starting to show us more glimpses of his potential. Hope the trend continues. Spent the most time on ground than any other Melbourne player too (93%TG), not bad for a fat boy hey DL?
-
Changes: Rd 05 v St. Kilda
I'd be happy with Lewis for Omac (concussion) and leave it at that. Save our weapons for Anzac day eve i.e May and Jetta and to a lesser extent Garlett (hoping to see some form in the VFL weekend). This isn't because I underestimate St Kilda FWIW. ANB stays out regardless of casey form for mine. Needs a few good games there to regain his confidence, and I truly hope that happens because when his head is screwed on he is a valuable asset
-
What to do with Nathan Jones
Jones unquestionably had a good game and was crucial at various times, stepping up and kicking a memorable captains goal. A lot to like about his game last night. The weight of averages must be satisfied however, last nights game while enjoyable doesn't satisfy my concerns of him as a player based on rounds 1-3. He needs to build on this and bring this leadership to the ground week in week out. A great start for Jonesy and it's really important he continues along this path.
- POST GAME: Rd 04 vs Sydney
- POST GAME: Rd 04 vs Sydney
- What to do with Nathan Jones
-
POST GAME: Rd 04 vs Sydney
I knew this was coming. It wasn’t a question of if, it was a question of when. Time to refocus. Sydney is not an impressive scalp these days but given the circumstance and the fact it’s was at the SCG makes it highly pleasing indeed. If we can get 3 to 4 on the trot now we are well and truly back in it. Go dees!!!!
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 04 vs Sydney
Well the sponsors wouldn't be too worried yet. No such thing as bad publicity, and there's been arguably more coverage of how bad we are right now vs what we would have got with a more expected start to the season.
-
Goody Presser (10/4)
Based on this, it would appear Jonesy is staying put on a wing * shudder *
-
Goody Presser (10/4)
All those saying players aren't buying into the game plan even though it's existed for 3+ years seems a bit off the mark to me. The game changed quite significantly with 666, and our game plan had to change to suit that. Our game plan is literally 3 rounds old, not 3+ years. Good example of this is that when we win clearances now, we rely on the midfield to deliver the footy into F50 more simply because our sweeping back flankers cant get there in time anymore. This is a good reason why connection has arguably gone backwards. Having said that, if players are going rogue and not "buying in" then that is more than a worry than the 3 losses themselves. Way to fill us with confidence demons. If by "not buying in" means not adhering to the game plan, then that's really bloody bad at this point of the teams development, and at odds with the perceived excellent relationships between players and coach. Alternatively, if by "not buying in" they simply mean putting in the work required to execute the game plan, then that's fixable. Hope not lost yet. A loss tomorrow will be really hard to swallow though. Frost needs to play out of his skin and shut down buddy otherwise we are in quite a bit of trouble.
-
Dees honesty session.
Also somewhat of a fashion delivery service. I get a new scarf to wear every year, you could call the style "disappointment chic"
-
Dees honesty session.
Yes Old Dee. Couldn't be happier. I love paying my MCC/MFC membership yearly, following the team religiously and frequenting this fan forum to engage in detailed analysis because I truly believe winning flags is unimportant. Lol.
-
Dees honesty session.
I reckon you’d be far better off financially if you got 10 bucks for every time someone complained they’ve been following the demons for a long time and are sick of not having a flag on demonland
- What to do with Nathan Jones