biggestred

It means he isnt one of the 17

Divorce. Or murderous rampage.

Best 22. Run em into the ground. 120pt win.

Its almost as if the afl knew... back in october...

worst possible preparation for round 1. why the [censored] should our club suffer for the mistakes of theirs? what a disgrace they are.

Dont forget that lots of stuff that might or might not have performance enhancing properties can be used as masking agents. Warnies diuretic is a classic example of this - not saying he used it as a masking agent but thats why his stuff was banned- because it can be.

no one seems too worried about Crowley's privacy...

5 goals to 1 since half time to the dogs.

Funny it works brilliantly on my laptop but not my ipad. Might jsut be me haha

Actually wouldnt have thoughtthat the players have any recourse to sue as they are responsible for what goes into their bodies. They cant sue themselves?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-players-could-sue-the-afl-if-found-guilty-of-doping-by-anti-doping-tribunal/story-fni5f6kv-1227261875765 What??? Sorry, Did Essendon not exist?

No

Ess getting a touch up

you know what would compromise our national game? the notion that if you have enough money you can get away with systematic doping.

wait. there was a lion king 2?

My point is if my employer had injected me with something and said it was something else id consider the duty of care breached regardless of my ban If i was paddy ryder id be suing for all they had.

But only if they were given lengthy bans not if they were found guilty Either way the duty of care had been breached..

Yes they are arrogant BUT if they are guilty then this is the biggest doping scandal in team sport in the world. Systematic doping by a club. If they are let off the hook then all sport as we know it will be a free for all and who has the most money to pay for drugs will win. It cannot be allowed to happen if we want clean sport, which we do. It doubly cannot be allowed to happen given the conduct of their club since.

well, 1 injection of a banned substance is too many. injections themselves are ok. however it definitely seems like attempted use!

Don't use logic

Btw 1000 injections divided by 34 players works out to 29.4 injections each. Obviously you cant have .4 of an injection but missing one or two would still make it 27 or 28 injections. Which is ridiculous.

Im not sure that some players missing regular injections would have much of an impact on penalties given they would still have had some.

http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/mix-of-penalties-likely-for-any-bombers-found-guilty-by-the-tribunal-20150309-13z3rk.html?&utm_source=social&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=nc&eid=socialn:twi-14omn0023-optim-nnn:nonpaid-27/06/2014-social_traffic-all-organicpost-nnn-age-o&campaign_code=nocode&promote_channel=social_twitter

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/essendon-antidoping-call-could-take-longer-than-expected-20150309-13z8j4.html Can we play them round 1?

And we would have too if we had ha forward line that was on the park