biggestred

http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/mix-of-penalties-likely-for-any-bombers-found-guilty-by-the-tribunal-20150309-13z3rk.html?&utm_source=social&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=nc&eid=socialn:twi-14omn0023-optim-nnn:nonpaid-27/06/2014-social_traffic-all-organicpost-nnn-age-o&campaign_code=nocode&promote_channel=social_twitter

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/essendon-antidoping-call-could-take-longer-than-expected-20150309-13z8j4.html Can we play them round 1?

And we would have too if we had ha forward line that was on the park

Still pisses me off we have to have white but there are other clubs that dont!

Any hints as to what you think the decision will be?

Anyone watching?

Just saw footage of this "training" session on the news Umpires Tackling Looked full on. What a diagrace

Vote 1 VFL grand final for AFL pre-game entertainment

to be fair, if i was interviewing Dank i would just let him say whatever he wanted and id "be on his side" so to speak. the more the guy says the more he either drops other people or himself in it. "approved somewhere in the world" seriously

get your agent/girlfriend/team mate/doctor to do it for you

the ONLY thing the afl and asada would do again is not let the govt hold a press conference announcing the investigation.

http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/texts-are-latest-twist-in-essendon-drugs-crisis-20130411-2hoou.html Dank was obviously REPORTING to hirdy. Periphery my arse.

https://checksubstances.asada.gov.au/ very very simple. try it - it even gives you a receipt number for your query. took me 30 seconds to put ventolin through and see if its ok.

YES THEY ARE. you can literally put the drug into the website and it will tell you if you can or cannot take it.

Slight conflict of interest id have thought

And to that i say http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/hird-was-warned-the-inside-story-on-essendons-drug-scandal-20130821-2savu.html

Care to elaborate?

Dank has absolutely DESTROYED essendon in that interview. No longer can the players claim innocence or that they were duped. No longer can essendon pretend they didnt have records. and "some approval somewhere in the world" wow.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/stephen-dank-says-he-would-do-it-again-20150301-13s29k.html?&utm_source=social&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=nc&eid=socialn:twi-14omn0023-optim-nnn:nonpaid-27/06/2014-social_traffic-all-organicpost-nnn-age-o&campaign_code=nocode&promote_channel=social_twitter Dont even know where to start with this!

Ive got that down as a loss

Mitch clark sprinting flat out in a cats jumper makes me sick

How on earth can hirdy still believe the investigation was illegal? I guess he has better law knowledge than 4 federal court judges. Just amazing.

haha yep what im saying is that either party will appeal depending on the result - and keep appealing until it is at CAS.

Whatever verdict is handed down, one party or other will appeal all the way to the CAS. Asada wont settle for less than 18 months and essendon wont settle for anything more than not guilty. There wont be any sackings until after the CAS has done its work.

meanwhile there are rookies getting around on bugger all......