dazzledavey36

Think this actually gets overblown a fair bit.. I just have more faith the guys who I have mentioned will turn out to be more rounded and well equipped to have better careers then Jackson because they're natural footballers who do show qualities that are similar to a Petracca, Jeremy Cameron and a Selwood. Big statement yes, but I'm happy to stick by this. And let's be honest, the early pick we get for Jackson, aren't we hoping they turn out to have better careers then him? Right now, Jackson is more of an athlete then footballer. He has enormous potential which I can see no doubt and don't worry I'm still disappointed to lose him, but all I see is another Mark Blicavs type who's handy plugging in holes in the ruck and burst in the midfield. Also think where the game is going there's a changing of guard in terms of the types of ruckman that are running around. These dudes are alot taller and physically bigger then I've ever seen before. Jacko being 199cm tall is almost considered on the short side now and just wonder if he'll ever be that dominant ruckman that everyone hopes for. Gawn, Grundy, Witts, English, Draper, McInerney These guys are example of the current ruckman running who are just taller and more physically bigger then Jacko is. Jacko certainly has the athletic ability to keep up but wonder if this will the downside of being a shorter type ruckman.

No. I think Jackson long term will be a talent. I just don't see him being the generational talent that everyone sees. Career so far he's rated below average for hitouts won, hitouts to advantage, clearances and. I think he has poor forward craft and gets lost quiet easily when resting down there which is where he'll spend time when rotating with Sean Darcy. Ashcroft, Sheezel, Cadman Wardlaw I see being more natural footballers with more upside to be genuine game breakers.

Beg to differ.

If we trade pick 27 for Grundy that is a huge steal. Reading the salty Pies comments on social media justifies this.

Summary anyone?

[censored] hell what a mess. Who am I kidding!?

Official

Great strategy if that's the case.

Grundy for pick 27 would be a steal. Much better then the original discussion of having to give up a 1st rounder which I was highly against. Wonder if we'll package up a future 2nd also?

In the words of the great Mark Neeld.. "I did not see this coming"

Great operator. We're certainly in good hands under Lamby.

Great interview! Got the feeling that we'll be asking a bit more then pick 43 for Bedford. Anyone else get that feeling?

About to come up.

Just heard Riley Beveridge say that Tim Lamb will be on trade radio soon. Will be good to tune in.

Was hoping for highlights and got some pommy bloke rambling on instead... 🤣 So let's try again..

I'm not entirely sure we were actually that keen? One of Wright's weaknesses in his junior days was his perceived lack of competitiveness, in other words he was soft and we barely showed interest? During this period Paul Roos and Todd Viney had a mantra of only drafting players who were highly competitive and driven. Which makes sense why we had Jake Lever rated as a potential top 3 talent.

True. Probably good way to look at it.

If it's true it doesn't make sense to me. We have Weideman and Brown who lack the physical presence imo and it doesn't make sense when Goodwin has a mantra of getting in players who are genuine competitors and compete. Then again, at the time I thought we did the right thing by staying away from Peter Wright..

Have no idea if this will come to fruition or even come out in the media and I put it down to pure speculation. Was just having coffee with a few mates who I hadn't seen for a while and one of them is heavily involved with the Murray Bushrangers under 18's as a development coach. We were speaking about the junior talent and then got talking about this year's trade period. Out of the blue he mentioned that apparently we've shown some interest in Josh Schache and have had chats to Josh and his management? I would like to think I can trust his word purely that he's got contacts within recruiting circles and Josh being an ex bushie. I have own opinion on this and I honestly don't think it's the right fit even though we're lacking a key forward.

Cornes is relentless on this. Only way to shove it back in his face is to sign a contract extension.

Collingwood supporters are dirty on this lol

This is correct and in response to @Kick_It_To_Pickett. WC have ruled out trading pick 2 for Jackson alone. They are though, open to the idea of splitting pick 2 to maybe two top ten picks which could help us get that pick we're after inside the 10.

Thanks for your time Freo. Onto West Coast we go.