Jump to content

3 strikes

Featured Replies

Posted

i remember not long ago someone posted a topic that said there was a big story coming, i heard at cricket training last night that someone has tested positvie 3 times. Just wondering if its the same thing! i would have thought this would be out by now considering the 3 strikes and its public knowledge!

 
 
  • Author

i know and the person that mentioned this was in the media in some terms and they know about it, it would suprise me that if they got there grubby little hands on it they wouldn't bring it out.

if its true that player get 2 years right! would that end there playing career?

Well there are three possibilities:

1. It's a fierce rumour, made up and taken as gospel, whilst the said player in question never actually got strike three.

2. It actually happened and the AFL are waiting to announce it (after draft week I would think).

And for the conspiracy theorists:

3. If said player in question was a big drawcard for the sport, exactly what people came to the footy to see, then this player's third strike was overlooked in light of the excitement and general greatness he brings to the game. :D And we will never hear about it.


  • Author
Well there are three possibilities:

1. It's a fierce rumour, made up and taken as gospel, whilst the said player in question never actually got strike three.

2. It actually happened and the AFL are waiting to announce it (after draft week I would think).

And for the conspiracy theorists:

3. If said player in question was a big drawcard for the sport, exactly what people came to the footy to see, then this player's third strike was overlooked in light of the excitement and general greatness he brings to the game. :D And we will never hear about it.

im thinking its 1 but he got 2 strikes!

fwiw the 3 strike policy results in a maximum 12 games suspension, because it is OoC the charge is something to do with bringing the game is disrepute etc not drug taking.

also regarding the big name player suspected of 3 strikes, ive got contacts within his management and all indications suggest its a false rumor. ok so management could cover it up too, but its a pretty good contact and i pretty much trust them...

3. If said player in question was a big drawcard for the sport, exactly what people came to the footy to see, then this player's third strike was overlooked in light of the excitement and general greatness he brings to the game. :D And we will never hear about it.

That is the one.... Right there.

Ive been told who the rumoured person is, the guy who told me works for the club.

Only thing is he isn't sure if it was his 2nd or 3rd strike, no one seems to 100% know. However it would not surprise me at all if they kept it quiet being how big a draw card he is for the game.

 

  • Author
That is the one.... Right there.

Ive been told who the rumoured person is, the guy who told me works for the club.

Only thing is he isn't sure if it was his 2nd or 3rd strike, no one seems to 100% know. However it would not surprise me at all if they kept it quiet being how big a draw card he is for the game.

something like this will not be kept quiet im sure, they couldnt possibly do that.

it brings me back to cousins, his issues were well known to nearly everybody before he was suspended, will a lesson be learned from him?

dont think we should mention the name on here

If you don't want to mention a name can you list a stat for his season and we can look it up

something like this will not be kept quiet im sure, they couldnt possibly do that.

it brings me back to cousins, his issues were well known to nearly everybody before he was suspended, will a lesson be learned from him?

correct, its not like we are the only ones who know who he is.

other clubs and players will know and if the let him get away with it, what kind of message is that sending? If your an up and coming superstar of the game, do all the drugs you want, we wont tell anyone because we can make all the money we want off you...

Wonder how long this thread lasts then! We all know of the player, I hear conflicting stories of 2 or 3 strikes from a couple of friends of mine, there doesnt seem to be any definitive answer to how many strikes he's on though...


  • Author
Wonder how long this thread lasts then! We all know of the player, I hear conflicting stories of 2 or 3 strikes from a couple of buddies of mine, there doesnt seem to be any definitive answer to how many strikes he's on though...

lol yeah i know friends of mine are the same, i think it may be just thats he and maybe a few teammates are well known for the kind of stuff but just ahvent been caught, if it keeps up though i think they will be gone hopefully!

Alright children, I think you've all made it clear who the player is with your little clues.

If other people haven't figured it out by now, tough.

No more cryptic clues please!

My mail is that it's definitely 3 strikes, and the substance in question can also be bought in a red, silver or black can.

The issue now is whether the 3rd strike was on match day.

My mail is that it's definitely 3 strikes, and the substance in question can also be bought in a red, silver or black can.

The issue now is whether the 3rd strike was on match day.

your mail is obviously wrong. if there was a first strike on match day he would be out. the three strikes rule only applies to out of competition testing, for which the punishment for the 3rd strike is 12 weeks. it gets stiffer for a 4th strike (i think its then up to 2 years).

as i mentioned all ready, i heard a few whispers and inquired about it and have been told it definitely didnt happen. i might be wrong but the people in the know (the best people who know) have told close friends that it is a rumour.

My mail is that it's definitely 3 strikes, and the substance in question can also be bought in a red, silver or black can.

The issue now is whether the 3rd strike was on match day.

Sorry, I don't know who the admin is to write to about this, but can I suggest (strongly) that the posts here are likely to be defamatory in nature notwithstanding the cryptic nature of them. Shut it down.

Your friendly defamation lawyer


My mail is that people here need to STFU if they don't want Demonland to get into trouble.

I'll add to that.

Anyone who claims that a person is a drug taker and identifies that person is personally liable as well.

I've just deleted most of the posts in this thread.

Please don't mention names, nicknames, or give away anymore cryptic clues.

This stuff can seriously damage the website and get the owners into huge trouble.

I repeat, DO NOT make any mention or give away any obvious clues about who this player may be.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Angry
    • 57 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Like
    • 225 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 34 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Haha
    • 546 replies