Jump to content

DIDAK ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE AGE

Featured Replies

Posted

How appropriate the caption on the photo says "Not allowed out", when clearly, "it" is almost all out.

NOT ALLOWED OUT (take care when opening)

 
How appropriate the caption on the photo says "Not allowed out", when clearly, "it" is almost all out.

Ash, I'm sure you've answered this question before, but why do you post on a Demon forum?

Nothing against it, I am just a little baffled.

  • Author
Ash, I'm sure you've answered this question before, but why do you post on a Demon forumn? Nothing against it, I am just a little baffled.

My wife is a Melbourne member. So I often go to the footy with her, thus seeing alot of Melb games.

Plus, I just like talking footy sometimes, and I find Demonland a better "chat" than Bomberblitz.

 

Ahhh got 'cha.

Hope there were no punch-ons Friday!

How appropriate the caption on the photo says "Not allowed out", when clearly, "it" is out.

Much ado about nothing. The shady object in question is the back of his shorts.


Much ado about nothing. The shady object in question is the back of his shorts.

Yep, it sure is. Pic is on the Age website.

press conference from collingwood on issue now on SEN

  • Author
Ahhh got 'cha.

Hope there were no punch-ons Friday!

It was a frosty trip home at times. Although we spend a fair bit of the trip discussing and reflecting on Neale Danihers caoching career. I have to admit, I had a lump in my throat as he left the field to a standing ovation.

 
  • Author

SEN apparently talking about it now.

Actually spoke to the guy who took the pic. They reckon it's definately his snag.

I opened the document, enlarged it 400% and still cannot see a thing.


How appropriate the caption on the photo says "Not allowed out", when clearly, "it" is almost all out.

NOT ALLOWED OUT (take care when opening)

Which one is the "Didak"? Or is that what both of them are called?

I guess he couldn't let Chris Tarrant upstage him.

I opened the document, enlarged it 400% and still cannot see a thing.

If you open an image, enlarged from the Age >pdf, in a more advanced editing program that supports "levels" it can be seen that the object in question is a continuous curve of the hem of the shorts. Sorry.

Definitely nothing more than a curve in the shorts.


My first glance and I have to admit that I thought "it" was hanging out. I then enlarged the area and it is obvious the it in question is in fact Didak's shorts. I have just had major issues with myself - yuk - I was actually trying to enlarge a photo to look at Didak's old fella - thank God it was just his shorts! I am ashamed of myself!!!

My first glance and I have to admit that I thought "it" was hanging out. I then enlarged the area and it is obvious the it in question is in fact Didak's shorts. I have just had major issues with myself - yuk - I was actually trying to enlarge a photo to look at Didak's old fella - thank God it was just his shorts! I am ashamed of myself!!!

Jeeeez!!! Go have shower. Yuk! :blink:

Yep - shower required - i am making myself feel very creepy but I bet I am not the only one who has sat here today trying to enlarge Didaks privates! What were we thinking????? Also, I am a girl which is just a bit less creepy than you blokes trying to do it!

Also, I am a girl which is just a bit less creepy than you blokes trying to do it!

Disagree.

You were enlarging Didak's groin area... it's disturbing regardless of gender ;):lol:

*Vomit*


Disagree.

You were enlarging Didak's groin area... it's disturbing regardless of gender ;):lol:

*Vomit*

Agree on all counts......

Sorry deesrock ;) !!!

In an amusing irony Didak's last words at his most recent Media Conference were "Basically I need to pull my head in".

Come on - everyone of you that has looked at this topic has done the same thing!!! At least I admitted it and stopped as soon as I realised what I was doing!

 
Come on - everyone of you that has looked at this topic has done the same thing!!! At least I admitted it and stopped as soon as I realised what I was doing!

Actually I saw it, threw up a little, and chucked the paper in the bin...

Of course, if the same unfortunate misprint happened to the guy on the left, I probably would have framed it ;)


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 239 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 113 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies