Jump to content

Featured Replies

6 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think Brad is the Problem

This is football Department and Fitness

Brad joined the board in November 2020. He and the board have been asleep at the wheel.

The FD report directly to the board. The board is accountable.

 
Just now, Adam The God said:

Brad joined the board in November 2020. He and the board have been asleep at the wheel.

The FD report directly to the board. The board is accountable.

Of course they are. But we need to replenish the Stocks of the Football Department and high Performance Management

I am sure they are well aware of that. It’s hard to fill assistant positions since COVID

Blame the AFL for that mess

11 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think Brad is the Problem

This is football Department and Fitness

He might be part of it SWYL but I hope at the least he is in deep conversation with Smith about when to pull the plug on Goody.

WE NEED A PLAN GOING FORWARD so that next season we can move full steam ahead. (Yes another wasted season this yr though).

 
1 minute ago, DemonOX said:

He might be part of it SWYL but I hope at the least he is in deep conversation with Smith about when to pull the plug on Goody.

WE NEED A PLAN GOING FORWARD so that next season we can move full steam ahead. (Yes another wasted season this yr though).

Everybody needs to take some responsibility, i am not excusing anybody

But our problems are on field

Adam is just salty that Peter Lawrence is not on the Board

1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Of course they are. But we need to replenish the Stocks of the Football Department and high Performance Management

I am sure they are well aware of that. It’s hard to fill assistant positions since COVID

Blame the AFL for that mess

No, I blame the board.

They installed Pert (a disaster) instead of those PJ put forward, and then allowed messy legal battles to play out over Goody's head for at least 12-18 months.

And every club in the land has the same constraints vis a vis COVID, that's not a reasonable excuse. We got unlucky with Burgess wanting to move home. I think had we had him across 2022-2023 we'd have at least another flag, but the personnel inside the FD have clearly let standards plummet and continue to do so.


Green needs to make decisions now, the club is losing everything they worked so hard to get, through the Roos/Jackson era.

They are playing local football standard in the AFL

They were all walking around with their hands on hips & heads down, HALFWAY THROUGH THE FIRST BLO#*Y QUARTER

Goodwin & Griffiths are to blame for this & if Clarry Trac & Kozzie want out then [censored] THEM OFF, they’ve treated us like trash for over 12 months

I’ve gone in to bat for Clarry for 2 years, but I’m over what he’s done to the club & Trac still carrying on like a spoilt brat

Bet they’re still holding out their hand for the massive pay checks

I’ve spoken to plenty of us Dees supporters that won’t go again until Goodwin goes

Just now, Adam The God said:

No, I blame the board.

They installed Pert (a disaster) instead of those PJ put forward, and then allowed messy legal battles to play out over Goody's head for at least 12-18 months.

And every club in the land has the same constraints vis a vis COVID, that's not a reasonable excuse. We got unlucky with Burgess wanting to move home. I think had we had him across 2022-2023 we'd have at least another flag, but the personnel inside the FD have clearly let standards plummet and continue to do so.

I know you blame the Board. Your Candidate wasn’t elected.

Losing Burgess was a HUGE loss that was out of anyone’s control, yes i believe it cost us a Flag… But you cannot blame the Board for that

 
2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Everybody needs to take some responsibility, i am not excusing anybody

But our problems are on field

We haven’t got an off field

Just now, Billy said:

We haven’t got an off field

Different issue, right now we must deal with personnel


1 minute ago, Billy said:

We haven’t got an off field

But of course this isn't the board's fault. 🤦

10 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Everybody needs to take some responsibility, i am not excusing anybody

But our problems are on field

Adam is just salty that Peter Lawrence is not on the Board

Either way hope at the least he is in deep conversation with Smith about when to pull the plug onGoody.

3 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

Either way hope at the least he is in deep conversation with Smith about when to pull the plug onGoody.

I am sure he is not the only one doing that Ox. The Club cannot afford to stand still. The damage only increases

32 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think Brad is the Problem

This is football Department and Fitness

If he hasn't the stones to do what's required.... then he's as much the problem as anyone.

6 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I am sure he is not the only one doing that Ox. The Club cannot afford to stand still. The damage only increases

Any chance Jackson coming back and fixing us for a second time?


4 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

If he hasn't the stones to do what's required.... then he's as much the problem as anyone.

He has a job to do right now. If he doesn’t, he should step aside. But we also need to find a replacement, putting in the wrong replacement would be catastrophic

It can’t all happen in an hour

39 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think Brad is the Problem

This is football Department and Fitness

You are correct.Brad unfortunely is totally ineffectual can't be him!

Watch him barbecued as the sacrifice by board members who

Escape scrutiny

3 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

Any chance Jackson coming back and fixing us for a second time?

Money always talks. Another crucial reason we didn’t snag a 2nd Flag…

2 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

Any chance Jackson coming back and fixing us for a second time?

And have the board say they were implicitly responsible? The board could have had PJ undertake the external review at the end of the last year. Instead they had Pert review himself.

Edited by Adam The God

3 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

And have the board say they were implicitly responsible? The board could have had PJ undertake the external review at the end of the last year. Instead they had Pert review himself.

Wish I could review myself at work !!


40 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

inOf course they are. But we need to replenish the Stocks of the Football Department and high Performance Management

I am sure they are well aware of that. It’s hard to fill assistant positions since COVID

Blame the AFL for that mess

wasn't green the football director? the board member that understands football and independent of the footy dept.

why didn't he see this train wreck coming?

6 minutes ago, BDA said:

wasn't green the football director? the board member that understands football and independent of the footy dept.

why didn't he see this train wreck coming?

Maybe he did and is already working on it. I haven’t spoken to Brad directly for 18 months, but i don’t think he is solely responsible for this mess, as has been suggested earlier in this thread

2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Maybe he did and is already working on it. I haven’t spoken to Brad directly for 18 months, but i don’t think he is solely responsible for this mess, as has been suggested earlier in this thread

He is president with seeming ly no power

 
8 minutes ago, BDA said:

wasn't green the football director? the board member that understands football and independent of the footy dept.

why didn't he see this train wreck coming?

As I mentioned months ago, Brad’s a nice guy however he doesn’t have the cajones to make these decisions. He shouldn’t be in the position he finds himself in.

and what exactly do you want him to do right now Kent?

Goodwin is done, personally i wish he had been replaced after the ‘23 Season, but that wasn’t to be

Who replaces him?

They’ve got to be a serious Coach to get this list firing

Quick reactions often backfire

We need Top Shelf

I am hoping the same process is taking place with the CEO


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 719 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies