Jump to content

Featured Replies

19 hours ago, Mickey said:

I saw some bulldog fans on Twitter saying the umps got us over line 😂

Funny thing is, when BBB gets the free in the third with 1 min left the frees are 14-12 and we are 6 points up. At the end of the third the frees are the same and the game is done!

 
17 hours ago, daisycutter said:

was max's non goal a goal?

have afl said anything about it?

was it reviewed  at the time?

It’s interesting that incidents like this, and the May mark in the 2nd that wasn’t paid, among others, aren’t picked apart when it’s a 74-point thumping. 

3 hours ago, Gippsland Dee said:

That one was a howler! Just about took picketts head off. 
but yes agree, aside from that one the game was generally very well umpired.

Harmes has his head ripped off a second prior also.  Was very grating to not get them while Hunter and McCrae got some very soft ones.

 
19 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

I can really only recall one outrageous decision and it went in the Dogs' favour - Pickett not getting a free for a high tackle, despite Hunter having got one for the exact same tackle earlier.

I really can't recall any other big umpiring errors.

Thought the game was well umpired.

There were three shockers I picked out, One was Hunters massive duck into a tackle for a free, two was picket doing a much smaller duck and not getting the free and three was the park not paid to May late in the second. Otherwise I though it was pretty good. 

18 hours ago, Engorged Onion said:

I thought Browns goal in the third was a clear hands in the back against him

I thought Schache should have had a free when Brayshaw smashed into him in their 50 

I thought  Pickett should have clearly had a free against Libba

I thought Max should have had a free in the goal square when Easton Wood went front on (spoiled the ball mind you)]

 

Brown didn't put his hands in his back, it was hid forarms, plus the hands in the back rule doesn't exist any more. Brown didn't push him either so that one was fine. Brayshaw also had his eyes on the ball, play on.


I think I shouted at the telly only twice (on the umpiring, that is - I was pretty vocal in other ways, including a primal scream of what I've since realised was emotional release after Clarry's goal) At the end of the game I said to my (non-footballing) partner that the umpires must have had a good game cos they weren't really noticeable. The analysis above suggests there were things to notice but, on their whole body of work, I think 'Mainly Went Unnoticed' is a pass-mark 3-word analysis of their game. 

4 hours ago, Premiers said:

The umpires called them out to play on for short kicks.  They were used to generally getting away with them.  It surprised them, they couldn't control the tempo and weren't ready to play on.

Thankfully the umps didn't give them too much leeway with throws etc. 

Their style of play depends on getting away with short kicks, and with throwing the ball out of close-in trouble.

It's not bending the rules, it's deliberately breaking them, and they're coached to do it. It's just wrong.

Maybe the AFL are waking up to this.

21 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

I can really only recall one outrageous decision and it went in the Dogs' favour - Pickett not getting a free for a high tackle, despite Hunter having got one for the exact same tackle earlier.

I really can't recall any other big umpiring errors.

Thought the game was well umpired.

 

20 hours ago, Clint Bizkit said:

In the third quarter when we were getting some momentum Viney was taken high at a centre bounce and it wasn’t paid then moments later he was penalised for  doing what a Bolldogs player had just done to him.

Fritsch was held in the goalsquare in the first quarter and not paid, but other than that it was well officiated.

These two were the worst.

As usual it was the non-calls that were the howlers and most of them were against us.

 

Why wasn't Ben Brown being held down to the ground by Cordy in the 3rd qtr after the free was given not paid 50?

Couldn't even win the free kick count on the biggest stage of the year. Losers.


A Swans mad friend of mine told me he loved that we outscored them 16 goals to 1, because in the 2016 GF they got 16 frees to 1 in the 2nd and 3rd quarters. Trying to verify this. Anyone know if that’s right? No wonder the Swans were furious that day.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 28 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 60 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 22 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Sad
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland