Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

As an unrestricted free agent then sure why not. Wouldn't want to be paying a high wage. He's had his fair share of injury issues recently and is most likely just about cooked. If its low risk then it's probably worthwhile but for some reason I'm not overly enthused about it.



Posted
4 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Marc Murphy. Yes. A two year deal on $250,000 base  

Low cost. High risk. High reward. 

I'd prefer someone from a winning culture and finals experience, a big no from me.

We need to replace Vince with the next Hodge, Lewis can play VFL next year in a coaching role developing juniors.


Posted

He has played 6 finals which (other than Those we have traded in) is more than every other player on our list.

If we are worried about loser culture then we should cut Jones and pretty much any one else.

He has done well in finals, hell, he was averaging nearly 6 tackles over his 4 games this year. 

KICKS 13.8

HANDBALLS 11.8

DISPOSALS 25.5

MARKS 5.5

HIT-OUTS 0.0

TACKLES 5.8

GOALS 0.5

AFL FANTASY 107.3

 

Not sure too many of our players would have better stats than that if you took a four week block of all their season.

Posted
1 hour ago, wizardinoz said:

Too old, now injury prone & comes from a losing culture. Clear definition of a list clogger.

Too old?

Too Injury prone?

Hmm.. You better hope you're right, because HERE THEY COME

 

 


Posted
On ‎6‎/‎15‎/‎2018 at 2:10 PM, Stormy Dee said:

Why would we want a clapped-out hack from the bottom side?

Agreed to old and SLOW!

Posted
5 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

He has played 6 finals which (other than Those we have traded in) is more than every other player on our list.

If we are worried about loser culture then we should cut Jones and pretty much any one else.

He has done well in finals, hell, he was averaging nearly 6 tackles over his 4 games this year. 

KICKS 13.8

HANDBALLS 11.8

DISPOSALS 25.5

MARKS 5.5

HIT-OUTS 0.0

TACKLES 5.8

GOALS 0.5

AFL FANTASY 107.3

 

Not sure too many of our players would have better stats than that if you took a four week block of all their season.

You know, after all this talk of Gaff, DeGoey, whoeva, etc etc.

 

I would be pretty happy to pickup Murphy and Sloane.... plus some good running kids from the draft.

Even more than endurance, we need some, break-away speedy young players.

  • Like 1

Posted

The issue with recruiting these older players is at the time of trade they may have the speed of the game in check however it can go quickly, see Vince and Lewis and to a lesser extent Jones. I think we can do better, I'd much rather bring in players from successful clubs.

Posted
4 hours ago, SFebey said:

The issue with recruiting these older players is at the time of trade they may have the speed of the game in check however it can go quickly, see Vince and Lewis and to a lesser extent Jones. I think we can do better, I'd much rather bring in players from successful clubs.

True, but Murphy losing speed would still be quicker than either at their peak ?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...