KB's comments leave me extremely cold saying we need more close-ups.  Does he really like the handball going out of frame to be taken by an unseen player (or opponent)?  I'd like to get some feel for what is ahead of and around the player like you can when you are at the footy.  If the camera  pulls back, KB says he only sees "ants"? He needs a bigger and better TV.

http://www.sen.com.au/news/afl/05-16/kbs-take-channel-seven-must-improve-afl-camerawork

Just now, sue said:

KB's comments leave me extremely cold saying we need more close-ups.  Does he really like the handball going out of frame to be taken by an unseen player (or opponent)?  I'd like to get some feel for what is ahead of and around the player like you can when you are at the footy.  If the camera  pulls back, KB says he only sees "ants"? He needs a bigger and better TV.

http://www.sen.com.au/news/afl/05-16/kbs-take-channel-seven-must-improve-afl-camerawork

His eyes are old

16 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

His eyes are old

I know the feeling.

In general they stay too close to the play - I'm constantly thinking "show the bloody game!"

I reckon he's right and, let alone getting the "behind the goal post" views of, wait for it, the bloody goal post at the centre bounces. I would get a better view of the bounce standing on our balcony with binoculars on.  On top of that the view of the centre bounces from the wings are way too far back and then don't zoom in far enough, quickly enough.

Or am I blind as well.

As long as the camera men from the Casey games isn't consulted I'm happy

I'd like a constant aerial picture-in-picture shot showing where all the players are. 

I sent him a text but could stay on air to see whether he read it - far too many close ups of the guy with the ball, especially if a mark or free, or uncontested, looks Ng around but we cannot see anything at all of what is going on off the ball, down the ground, maneuvering and jostling.  Just a look at some guy's face.